Complexity Levels of Representing Dynamics in EA Planning | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Complexity Levels of Representing Dynamics in EA Planning

  • Conference paper
Advances in Enterprise Engineering III (CIAO! 2009, EOMAS 2009)

Abstract

Enterprise Architecture (EA) models provide information on the fundamental as-is structure of a company or governmental agency and thus serve as an informational basis for informed decisions in enterprise transformation projects. At the same time EA models provide a means to develop and visualize to-be states in the EA planning process. Results of a literature review and implications from industry practices show that existing EA planning processes do not sufficiently cover dynamic aspects in EA planning. This paper conceptualizes seven levels of complexity for structuring EA planning dynamics by a system of interrelated as-is and to-be models. While level 1 represents the lowest complexity with non-connected as-is and to-be models, level 7 covers a multi-period planning process also taking plan deviations during transformation phases into account. Based on these complexity levels, a multi-stage evolution of EA planning processes is proposed which develops non-dynamic as-is EA modeling into full-scale EA planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEEE: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software Intensive Systems (IEEE Std 1471-2000). IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tyler, D.F., Cathcart, T.P.: A structured Method for Developing Agile Enterprise Architectures. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Agile Manufacturing (ICAM 2006), Norfolk, Virginia, USA, pp. 1–8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rohloff, M.: Framework and Reference for Architecture Design. In: Proceedings of 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2008), Toronto (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winter, R., Fischer, R.: Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3(2), 7–18 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., Doest, H.W.L., Arbab, F., Bosma, H., Wieringa, R.J.: Enterprise architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation. Information Systems Frontiers 8, 63–66 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology – Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Winter, R., Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S.: Analysis and Application Scenarios of Enterprise Architecture – An Exploratory Study. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3(3), 33–43 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Niemi, E.: Enterprise Architecture Stakeholders – A holistic view. In: Proceedings of 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2007), Keystone, CO (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ylimäki, T.: Potential Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 2(4), 29–40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Op’t Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture – Creating Value by Informed Governance. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frank, U.: Perspective Enterprise Modeling (MEMO) – Conceptual Framework and Modeling Languages. In: Proceedings of 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., van Buuren, R., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Bonsangue, M., van der Torre, L.: Concepts for Modelling Enterprise Architectures. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13(3), 257–287 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi, M., Sein, M.K.: Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Approach (2003), http://tiesrv.hkkk.fi/iris26/presentation/workshop_designRes.pdf (last access 01.02.2004)

  15. King, W.: Strategic Planning for Management Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 2(1), 27–37 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Targowski, A.: The architecture and planning of enterprise-wide information management systems. Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eliot, L.B.: Information systems strategic planning. Computer Technology Research Corporation, Charleston (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. IBM: Business Systems Planning: Information Systems Planning Guide, 4 edn., vol. 1, Atlanta, IBM (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spewak, S.H., Hill, S.C.: Enterprise Architecture Planning – Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spewak, S.H., Tiemann, M.: Updating the Enterprise Architecture Planning Model. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 2(2), 11–19 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pulkkinen, M.: Systemic Management of Architectural Decisions in Enterprise Architecture Planning. Four Dimensions and Three Abstraction Levels. In: Proceedings of 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2006), Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 179a (1–9). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Pulkkinen, M., Hirvonen, A.: EA Planning, Development and Management Process for Agile Enterprise Development. In: Proceedings of 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS 2005), pp. 223.3 (1–10). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Hirvonen, A., Pulkkinen, M.: A Practical Approach to EA Planning and Development: the EA Management Grid. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Business Information Systems, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu, pp. 284–302 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niemann, K.D.: From Enterprise Architecture to IT Governance. Elements of Effective IT Management. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leppänen, M., Valtonen, K., Pulkkinen, M.: Towards a Contingency Framework for Engineering an Enterprise Architecture Planning Method. In: Proceedings of 30th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 2007), Tampere, Finland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Murer, S., Worms, C., Furrer, F.: Managed Evolution – Nachhaltige Weiterentwicklung grosser Systeme. Informatik-Spektrum 31(6), 537–547 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Buckl, S., Ernst, A., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: An Information Model for Landscape Management – Discussing Temporality Aspects. In: Proceedings of 3rd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2008), Sydney (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lankes, J., Schweda, C.: Using Metrics to Evaluate Failure Propagation in Application Landscapes. In: Proceedings of Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI 2008), München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lankes, J., Matthes, F., Ploom, T.: Evaluating Failure Propagation in the Application Landscape of a Large Bank. In: Proceedings of Component-Based Software Engineering and Software Architecture (CompArch 2008), Karlsruhe (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matthes, F., Buckl, S., Leitel, J., Schweda, C.M.: Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey 2008, München: Software Engineering for Business Information Systems (sebis) Ernst Denert-Stiftungslehrstuhl Chair for Informatics 19 TU München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Buckl, S., Dierl, T., Matthes, F., Ramacher, R., Schweda, C.M.: Current and Future Tool Support for EA Management. In: Proceedings of Workshop MDD, SOA und IT-Management (MSI 2008), Oldenburg, Gito (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. James, G.A., Handler, R.A.: Cool Vendors in Enterprise Architecture, Gartner Research G00146330 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peyret, H.: Forrester Wave: Business Process Analysis, EA Tools, And IT Planning, Q1 2009, Forrester Research (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aier, S., Riege, C., Winter, R.: Classification of Enterprise Architecture Scenarios – An Exploratory Analysis. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures 3(1), 14–23 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aier, S., Gleichauf, B., Saat, J., Winter, R. (2009). Complexity Levels of Representing Dynamics in EA Planning. In: Albani, A., Barjis, J., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering III. CIAO! EOMAS 2009 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01915-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01915-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01914-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01915-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics