Argumentation and Artifact for Dialogue Support | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Argumentation and Artifact for Dialogue Support

  • Conference paper
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5384))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

Intelligent and autonomous software agents may engage in dialogue and argument with one another, and much recent research has considered protocols, architectures and frameworks for this. Just as with human dialogues, such agent dialogues may be facilitated by the presence of a mediator, able to summarise different positions, identify common assumptions and inconsistencies, and make appropriate interventions in the dialogue. Drawing on the theory of co-ordination artifacts in multi-agent systems, we propose a formal framework to explicitly represent the functions of a mediator artifact. We then describe an implementation of this framework using the TuCS oN coordination infrastructure for MAS, where the mediator artifact is realised by a tuple centre—a programmable tuple space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doutre, S., McBurney, P., Wooldridge, M.: Law-governed Linda as a semantics for agent dialogue protocols. In: Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Koenig, S., Kraus, S., Singh, M.P., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) 4rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2005), Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-29, 2005, pp. 1257–1258. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–358 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Forester, J.: The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gelernter, D.: Generative communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 7(1), 80–112 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon, T.F., Karacapilidis, N.: The Zeno argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 10–18. ACM Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen, London, UK (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Posit spaces: a performative theory of e-commerce. In: Wooldridge, M., Rosenschein, J.S., Sandholm, T., Yokoo, M. (eds.) Proceedings of AAMAS 2003, pp. 624–631. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oliva, E., McBurney, P., Omicini, A.: Co-argumentation artifact for agent societies. In: Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Reed, C. (eds.) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS, vol. 4946, pp. 31–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Omicini, A.: Formal ReSpecT in the A&A perspective. In: Canal, C., Viroli, M. (eds.) 5th International Workshop on Foundations of Coordination Languages and Software Architectures (FOCLASA 2006), CONCUR 2006, Bonn, Germany, University of Málaga, Spain, August 31, 2006, pp. 93–115 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Omicini, A., Denti, E.: From tuple spaces to tuple centres. Science of Computer Programming 41(3), 277–294 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Omicini, A., Ricci, A., Viroli, M.: An algebraic approach for modelling organisation, roles and contexts in MAS. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing 16(2-3), 151–178 (2005); Special Issue: Process Algebras and Multi-Agent Systems

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Omicini, A., Ricci, A., Viroli, M.: Agens Faber: Toward a theory of artefacts for MAS. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Sciences 150(3), 21–36 (2006); 1st International Workshop “Coordination and Organization” (CoOrg 2005), COORDINATION 2005, Namur, Belgium, . Proceedings, April 22 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F.: Coordination for Internet application development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(3), 251–269 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons, S., McBurney, P.: Argumentation-based communication between agents. In: Huget, M.-P. (ed.) Communication in Multiagent Systems. LNCS, vol. 2650, pp. 164–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(6), 1009–1040 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In: Gabbay, D.M., Guenther, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4, pp. 219–318. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ricci, A., Viroli, M., Omicini, A.: Programming MAS with artifacts. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) PROMAS 2005. LNCS ( LNAI), vol. 3862, pp. 206–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Viroli, M., Ricci, A., Omicini, A.: Operating instructions for intelligent agent coordination. Knowledge Engineering Review 21(1), 49–69 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oliva, E., Viroli, M., Omicini, A., McBurney, P. (2009). Argumentation and Artifact for Dialogue Support. In: Rahwan, I., Moraitis, P. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5384. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00206-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00207-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics