Abstract
Several approximate policy iteration schemes without value functions, which focus on policy representation using classifiers and address policy learning as a supervised learning problem, have been proposed recently. Finding good policies with such methods requires not only an appropriate classifier, but also reliable examples of best actions, covering the state space sufficiently. Up to this time, little work has been done on appropriate covering schemes and on methods for reducing the sample complexity of such methods, especially in continuous state spaces. This paper focuses on the simplest possible covering scheme (a discretized grid over the state space) and performs a sample-complexity comparison between the simplest (and previously commonly used) rollout sampling allocation strategy, which allocates samples equally at each state under consideration, and an almost as simple method, which allocates samples only as needed and requires significantly fewer samples.
This project was partially supported by the ICIS-IAS project and the Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant MCIRG-CT-2006-044980 awarded to Michail G. Lagoudakis within the 6th European Framework Programme.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Fischer, P.: Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Machine Learning Journal 47(2-3), 235–256 (2002)
Auer, P., Ortner, R., Szepesvari, C.: Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem. In: Bshouty, N.H., Gentile, C. (eds.) COLT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4539, pp. 454–468. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Bertsekas, D.: Dynamic programming and suboptimal control: From ADP to MPC. Fundamental Issues in Control, European Journal of Control 11(4-5) (2005); From 2005 CDC, Seville, Spain
Dimitrakakis, C., Lagoudakis, M.: Rollout sampling approximate policy iteration. Machine Learning 72(3) (September 2008)
Even-Dar, E., Mannor, S., Mansour, Y.: Action elimination and stopping conditions for the multi-armed bandit and reinforcement learning problems. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7, 1079–1105 (2006)
Fern, A., Yoon, S., Givan, R.: Approximate policy iteration with a policy language bias. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16(3) (2004)
Fern, A., Yoon, S., Givan, R.: Approximate policy iteration with a policy language bias: Solving relational Markov decision processes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 25, 75–118 (2006)
Kocsis, L., Szepesvári, C.: Bandit based Monte-Carlo planning. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS, vol. 4212, pp. 282–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Lagoudakis, M.G., Parr, R.: Reinforcement learning as classification: Leveraging modern classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 424–431 (August 2003)
Langford, J., Zadrozny, B.: Relating reinforcement learning performance to classification performance. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine learning (ICML), Bonn, Germany, pp. 473–480 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dimitrakakis, C., Lagoudakis, M.G. (2008). Algorithms and Bounds for Rollout Sampling Approximate Policy Iteration . In: Girgin, S., Loth, M., Munos, R., Preux, P., Ryabko, D. (eds) Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning. EWRL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5323. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89722-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89722-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89721-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89722-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)