Abstract
In ubiquitous environment, terminal-initiated traffics(e.g., sensor data streams) will become more popularized than human-initiated traffics(e.g., web browsing, file transfer, and media streaming). The characteristics of the terminal-initiated traffics can be described as the streams of small sized packets with the large number of simultaneous connections. Thus, an ubiquitous service server will suffer from the burden of the terminal-initiated traffics since the per-packet-cost of a CPU will increase proportionally with the number of terminals. In this paper, we propose Latona architecture that offloads not only TCP/IP processing but also parts of socket processing from a host to minimize the per-packet-cost of a CPU in a Linux server. Based on the experimental results, the Latona kernel could save 50% and 79% of the kernel execution time of send() and recv() for 32 bytes transfer in the legacy TCP/IP stack. The packet-per-second were 21.9K and 18.3K for send() and recv(),respectively. The bandwidth increased as the size of payload increased. The profile of detail execution time showed that the bottleneck of the Latona was for handling the socket and the TCP in Latona hardware.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Matsumoto, M., Itho, T.: Study of Server Processing Load Evaluations in Ubiquitous Communication Environments. In: Proc. of the International Symposium on Applications and Internet Workshop, pp. 122–125 ( January 2006)
IETF RFC2778: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging (2000)
IETF RFC2779: Instant Messaging/Presence Protocol Requirements (2000)
Ararwal, P., Banerjee, A., Flammer, J.: RFID Technical Challenges and Reference Architecture, http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/11/rfid-reference-architecture.html
Clark, D., Jacobson, V., Romkey, J., Salwen, H.: An Analysis of TCP Processing Overhead. IEEE Communications Magazine 27(6), 23–29 (1989)
Foong, A.P., et al.: TCP Performance Re-Visited. In: Proc. of the International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, pp. 70–79 (March 2003)
Earls, A.: TCP Offload Engines Finally Arrive. Storage Magazine (March 2002)
Currid, A.: TCP Offload to the Rescue. Queue 2(3), 58–65 (2004)
Mogul, J.: TCP Offloading Is a Dumb Idea Whose Time Has Come. In: Proc. 9th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems. Usenix Assoc. (2003)
Regnier, G., et al.: TCP Onloading for Data Center Servers. IEEE Computer 37(11), 46–56 (2004)
Rangarajan, M., et al.: TCP servers: Offloading TCP Processing in Internet Servers. Design, Implementation and Performance, Tech. Rep. Rutgers University (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Park, K., Oh, S., Kim, S., Chung, Y. (2008). A Network I/O Architecture for Terminal-Initiated Traffics in an Ubiquitous Service Server. In: Vazão, T., Freire, M.M., Chong, I. (eds) Information Networking. Towards Ubiquitous Networking and Services. ICOIN 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5200. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89524-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89524-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89523-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89524-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)