Verifying Space and Time Requirements for Resource-Bounded Agents | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Verifying Space and Time Requirements for Resource-Bounded Agents

  • Conference paper
Model Checking and Artificial Intelligence (MoChArt 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4428))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 380 Accesses

Abstract

The effective reasoning capability of an agent can be defined as its capability to infer, within a given space and time bound, facts that are logical consequences of its knowledge base. In this paper we show how to determine the effective reasoning capability of an agent with limited memory by encoding the agent as a transition system and automatically verifying whether a state where the agent believes a certain conclusion is reachable from the start state. We present experimental results using the Model Based Planner (mbp) which illustrates how the length of the deduction varies for different memory sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ågotnes, T., Walicki, M.: Complete axiomatizations of finite syntactic epistemic states. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3904, pp. 33–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alechina, N., Logan, B., Whitsey, M.: A complete and decidable logic for resource-bounded agents. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 606–613. ACM Press, New York (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benerecetti, M., Giunchiglia, F., Serafini, L.: Model Checking Multiagent Systems. Journal of Logic and Computation, Special Issue on Computational & Logical Aspects of Multi-Agent Systems 8(3), 401–423 (1998)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, M., Bauer, B., Watzke, M.: A scalable agent infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Infrastructure for Agents, MAS and Scalable MAS (held in conjuction with Autonomous Agents’01), Montreal (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bibel, W.: A deductive solution for plan generation. New Generation Computing 4, 115–132 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cimatti, A., Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Traverso, P.: Weak, Strong, and Strong Cyclic Planning via Symbolic Model Checking. Artificial Intelligence 147(1,2), 35–84 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Duc, H.N.: Reasoning about rational, but not logically omniscient, agents. Journal of Logic and Computation 7(5), 633–648 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Elgot-Drapkin, J., Miller, M., Perlis, D.: Memory, reason and time: the Step-Logic approach. In: Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface, pp. 79–103. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elgot-Drapkin, J.J., Perlis, D.: Reasoning situated in time I: Basic concepts. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2, 75–98 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fikes, R.E., Nilsson, N.J.: STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 187–208 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher, M., Ghidini, C.: Programming Resource-Bounded Deliberative Agents. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), pp. 200–206. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: A proposal for an OWL rules language. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2004, pp. 723–731. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacopin, E.: Classical AI planning as theorem proving: The case of a fragment of linear logic. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Automated Deduction in Nonstandard Logics, pp. 62–66. AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kacprzak, M., Lomuscio, A., Penczek, W.: Verification of multiagent systems via unbounded model checking. In: Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D., Alonso, E. (eds.) Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems II(AAMAS). LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3394, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kautz, H., Selman, B.: Pushing the envelope: Planning, propositional logic, and stochastic search. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1194–1201. AAAI Press, Stanford, California, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Russell, S.J.: Rationality and intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 94(1-2), 57–77 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tarkoma, S., Laukkanen, M.: Supporting software agents on small devices. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 565–566. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. van Benthem, J., Liu, F.: Diversity of agents in games. Philosophia Scientiae, vol. 8(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stefan Edelkamp Alessio Lomuscio

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alechina, N., Bertoli, P., Ghidini, C., Jago, M., Logan, B., Serafini, L. (2007). Verifying Space and Time Requirements for Resource-Bounded Agents. In: Edelkamp, S., Lomuscio, A. (eds) Model Checking and Artificial Intelligence. MoChArt 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4428. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74128-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74128-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74127-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74128-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics