Abstract
Safety-critical medical work requires an error-minded approach for design of the technologies that support its processes. We define the requirements that such a framework should meet and propose ICAD – an adverse-event minded design approach for high-risk eHealth applications that considers users, joint activity processes, the distributed computer-supported medical setting, and the workflow areas that allow for communication and coordination breakdowns to occur. We leverage knowledge for human error analysis during the task-modeling stages from other safety-critical domains, and expand the focus of analysis to integrate complex joint activity aspects and to account for the role of technology, both as a medium and as an interactor. The outcome of our technique is design and workflow solutions that prevent accidents, a priori.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, J.M., Heritage, J.: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)
Baker, G.R., Norton, P.G., Flintoft, V., Blais, R., Brown, A., Cox, J., et al.: The Canadian Adverse Events Study. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 170, 1678–1686 (2004)
Barnard, P., May, J., Duke, D., Duce, D.: Systems, Interactions and Macrotheory. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 222–262 (2000)
Basnyat, S., Palanque, P.: A Task Pattern Approach to Incorporate User Deviation in Task Models. In: Proc. 1st ADVISES Young Researchers Workshop. Liege, Belgium (2005)
Bogner, M.S. (ed.): Human error in medicine. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1994)
Bogner, M.S. (ed.): Misadventure in health care. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (2003)
Casey, S.: Set Phasers on Stun and other true tales of design, technology and human error, 2nd edn. Aegean Publishing, Santa Barbara, CA (1998)
Chassin, M.R., Becher, E.C.: The Wrong Patient. Ann. Intern. Med. 136, 826–833 (2002)
Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
Cockton, G., Woolrych, A.: Sale Must End: should discount methods be cleared off HCI’s shelves? Interactions 9, 13–18 (2002)
Easterbrook, S.M.: Coordination Breakdowns: Why Groupware is so Hard to Design. In: Proc. 28th Hawaii Int. Conf. Sys. Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, pp. 191–199 (1995)
Expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS: An Organisation With a Memory. Department of Health. The Stationery Office, London (2000)
Fields, R., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Tahmassebi, S.: Comparing design options for allocating communication media in cooperative safety-critical contexts: a method and a case study. ACM Trans. Comput.- Hum. Interact. 6, 370–398 (1999)
Hollnagel, E.: The phenotype of erroneous actions: implications for HCI design. In: Weir, G., Alty, J. (eds.) HCI and Complex Systems, pp. 73–121. Academic Press, London (1991)
Israelski, E.W., Muto, W.H.: Human factors risk management as a way to improve medical device safety. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 30, 689–695 (2004)
Killich, S., Luczak, H., Schlick, C., Weissenbach, M., Wiedenmaier, S., Ziegler, J.: Task modelling for cooperative work. Beh. & Info. Tech. 18, 325–338 (1999)
Kohn, L.T., Corrigan, J.M., Donaldson, M.S. (eds.): To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1999)
Lim, Y.: Multiple Aspect Based Task Analysis (MABTA) for User Requirements Gathering in Highly-Contextualized Interactive Sys. Design. In: Proc. Tamodia, pp. 7–15. ACM Press, New York (2004)
Muto, W.H., Israelski, E.: Challenges in HCI Development for Medical Devices: A Human Factors Perspective. In: Proc. HCI Int. 2005. Las Vegas Nevada (2005)
Paterno, F., Santoro, C., Fields, B.: Analysing User Deviations in Interactive Safety-critical Applications. In: Proc. DSV-IS 1999, pp. 189–204. Braga (1999)
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Tahmassebi, S.: Formal Models for Cooperative Tasks: Concepts and an Application for EnRoute Air Traffic Control. In: DSV-IS 1998, Abingdon (1998)
Patterson, E.S., Cook, R.I., Woods, D.D., Render, M.L.: Examining the complexity behind a medication error: Generic patterns in communication. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A 34, 749–756 (2004)
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: Task Analysis for Groupware Usability Evaluation. ACM Trans. Comp.-Hum. Interac. 10, 281–311 (2003)
Pocock, S., Harrison, M.D., Wright, P.C., Johnson, P.D.: THEA: a technique for human error assessment early in design. In: Hirose, M. (ed.) IFIP TC. 13 Int. Conf. Hum.-Comp. Interac., pp. 247–254. IOS Press, Ohmsha (2001)
Rasmussen, J.: Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering. North Holland, New York (1986)
Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1990)
van der Veer, G., van Welie, M.: Task Based Groupware Design: Putting Theory into Practice. In: Proc. DIS 2000, pp. 326–337. ACM Press, New York (2000)
Zhang, J., Johnson, T.R., Patel, V.L., Paige, D.L., Kubose, T.: Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices. J. Biomedical Informatics 36, 22–30 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taneva, S., Law, E. (2007). Interfacing Safety and Communication Breakdowns: Situated Medical Technology Design. In: Jacko, J.A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Applications and Services. HCI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4553. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73111-5_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73111-5_60
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73109-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73111-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)