A Conceptual Framework for Composition in Business Process Management | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Conceptual Framework for Composition in Business Process Management

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems (BIS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4439))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this work, we present a conceptual framework for deriving executable business process models from high-level, graphical business process models based on the paradigm of Service-Oriented Architectures and Semantic Web technology. We hereby envision a direct, but implicit link from a business analyst’s view on a process model to its execution driven by an IT system. This linkage enables the derivation of an execution-level model for newly created business process models as well as adaptation of the execution model after re-engineering processes, possibly under certain re-design goals (such as quality, cost, execution time, flexibility, or others).

The framework includes a component architecture and an algorithm that describes how to combine executable artifacts, such as (Semantic) Web services, in order to find an implementation that matches a given business process model. An extensible set of criteria can be used for validating the composition.

This work has in part been funded through the European Union’s 6th Framework Programme, within Information Society Technologies (IST) priority under the SUPER project (FP6-026850, http://www.ip-super.org ).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alves, A., et al.: Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. OASIS Public Review Draft, 23rd August (2006), http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/

  2. Berardi, D., et al.: Automatic Composition of Transition-based Semantic Web Services With Messaging. In: VLDB ’05: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 613–624. VLDB Endowment (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling Systems, ICAPS 2003 – 2006, proceedings at http://www.aaai.org/Library/ICAPS/icaps-library.php

  4. McIlraith, S., Son, T.C.: Adapting Golog for Composition of Semantic Web Services. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Principles and Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-02), Toulouse, France (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koehler, J., et al.: The Role of Visual Modeling and Model Transformations in Business-driven Development. In: Fifth International Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Küster, J., Koehler, J., Ryndina, K.: Improving Business Process Models with Reference Models in Business-Driven Development. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Küster, U., Stern, M., König-Ries, B.: A Classification of Issues and Approaches in Automatic Service Composition. In: Proc. of the First International Workshop on Engineering Service Compositions (WESC’05), December 2005, pp. 25–33 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, L., Horrocks, I.: A Software Framework For Matchmaking Based on Semantic Web Technology. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Wide Web Conference (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paolucci, M., et al.: Semantic Matching of Web Service Capabilities. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pistore, M., Traverso, P., Bertoli, P.: Automated Composition of Web Services by Planning in Asynchronous Domains. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Preist, C.: A Conceptual Architecture for Semantic Web Services. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, J.: Semantic Web Service Composition via Logic-based Program Synthesis. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, J., et al.: A Mixed Initiative Approach to Semantic Web Service Discovery and Composition: SAP’s Guided Procedures Framework. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2006), Chicago, USA, September 18–22 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sinur, J., Hill, J.B.: Align BPM and SOA Initiatives Now to Increase Chances of Becoming a Leader by 2010. Gartner Predicts 2007 (10 November 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Toma, I., et al.: An Evaluation of Discovery approaches in Grid and Web services Environments. In: NODe/GSEM 2005, pp. 233–247 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vu, L.-H., et al.: A Search Engine for QoS-enabled Discovery of Semantic Web Services. Special Issue of the International Journal on Business Process Integration and Management (IJBPIM), to be published (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weber, I.: Requirements for the Implementation of Business Process Models through Composition of Semantic Web Services. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications (I-ESA), Funchal, Portugal (March 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cabral, L., et al.: D5.6 Mediator Library. Deliverable of the DIP project (July 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI): Web Service Modelling Ontology (2004), http://www.wsmo.org

  21. Ouyang, C., et al.: Translating BPMN to BPEL. BPM Center Report BPM-06-02 (2006), http://BPMcenter.org

  22. Mendling, J., Lassen, K.B., Zdun, U.: Transformation Strategies between Block-Oriented and Graph-Oriented Process Modelling Languages. In: Lehner, F., Nösekabel, H., Kleinschmidt, P. (eds.) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2006, Band 2, XML4BPM Track, pp. 297–312. GITO-Verlag, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schaffner, J., Meyer, H., Tosun, C.: A Semi-automated Orchestration Tool for Service-based Business Processes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Service-Oriented Applications: Design and Composition, Chicago, USA (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffmann, J.: FF: The Fast-Forward Planning System. AI Magazine 22(3), 57–62 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Ontology Language (OWL), W3C Recommendation (10 February 2004), http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Witold Abramowicz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weber, I., Markovic, I., Drumm, C. (2007). A Conceptual Framework for Composition in Business Process Management. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4439. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72035-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72035-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72034-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72035-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics