Prioritized Active Integrity Constraints for Database Maintenance | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Prioritized Active Integrity Constraints for Database Maintenance

  • Conference paper
Advances in Databases: Concepts, Systems and Applications (DASFAA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4443))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper presents a logic framework wherein constraints and preferences are used for database maintenance and querying. Our proposal is based on the use of a special type of integrity constraints (called Prioritized Active Integrity Constraints (PAICs)), whose body defines a constraint on data, whereas the head contains a set of partially ordered actions, which should be performed, if the body constraint is not satisfied, to make consistent the database. Therefore, a preference relation among repairs is introduced on the base of the (partially ordered) actions specified in the head of PAICs. On the base of the preference relation a set of preferred repairs is identified and preferred answers are derived from the database instances which have been made consistent by means of preferred repairs. The paper shows that databases with universal prioritized constraints admit (preferred) repairs and consistent answers if the set of constraints is satisfiable. The paper also shows how PAICs can be rewritten into disjunctive Datalog programs so that repairs can be obtained from the computation of stable models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arenas, M., Bertossi, L., Chomicki, J.: Consistent query Answers in inconsistent databases. In: PODS, pp. 68–79 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arenas, M., Bertossi, L., Chomicki, J.: Specifying and Querying Database repairs using Logic Programs with Exceptions. In: FQAS, pp. 27–41 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arenas, M., Bertossi, L., Chomicki, J.: Answer sets for consistent query answering in inconsistent databases. TPLP 3(4-5), 393–424 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer Set Optimization. In: IJCAI, pp. 867–872 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caroprese, L., Greco, S., Sirangelo, C., Zumpano, E.: Declarative Semantics of Production Rules for Integrity Maintenance. In: Etalle, S., Truszczyński, M. (eds.) ICLP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4079, pp. 26–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chomicki, J.: Preference Formulas in Relational Queries. ACM TODS 28(4), 1–40 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chomicki, J., Lobo, J., Naqvi, S.A.: Conflict Resolution Using Logic Programming. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15(1), 244–249 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chomicki, J., Staworko, S., Marcinkowski, J.: Preference-Driven Querying of Inconsistent Relational Databases. In: Proc. International Workshop on Inconsistency and Incompleteness in Databases (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H.: A Framework for Compiling Preferences in Logic Programs. TPLP 3(2), 129–187 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Mannila, H.: Disjunctive Datalog. TODS 22(3), 364–418 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gelfond, M., Son, T.C.: Reasoning with Prioritized Defaults. In: Dix, J., Moniz Pereira, L., Przymusinski, T.C. (eds.) LPKR 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1471, pp. 164–223. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In: ICLP (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical Negation in Logic Programs and Disjunctive Databases. In: NGC, vol. 9, pp. 365–385 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grant, J., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Reasoning in Inconsistent Knowledge Bases. TKDE 7(1), 177–189 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Greco, S., Zumpano, E.: Querying Inconsistent Databases. In: Parigot, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1955, pp. 308–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Greco, G., Greco, S., Zumpano, E.: A Logical Framework for Querying and Repairing Inconsistent Databases. IEEE TKDE 15(6), 1389–1408 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, J., Mendelzon, A.O.: Merging Databases Under Constraints. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 7(1), 55–76 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marek, V.W., Truszczynski, M.: Revision Programming. Theoretical Computer Science 190(2), 241–277 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sakama, C., Inoue, K.: Priorized logic programming and its application to commonsense reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 123, 185–222 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ullman, J.K.: Principles of Database and Knowledge-Base Systems, vol. 1. Computer Science Press, Rockville (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wijsen, J.: Condensed Representation of Database Repairs for Consistent Query Answering. In: Calvanese, D., Lenzerini, M., Motwani, R. (eds.) ICDT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2572, pp. 375–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, Y., Foo, N.: Answer sets for prioritized logic programs. In: ILPS, pp. 69–83 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ramamohanarao Kotagiri P. Radha Krishna Mukesh Mohania Ekawit Nantajeewarawat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Caroprese, L., Greco, S., Molinaro, C. (2007). Prioritized Active Integrity Constraints for Database Maintenance. In: Kotagiri, R., Krishna, P.R., Mohania, M., Nantajeewarawat, E. (eds) Advances in Databases: Concepts, Systems and Applications. DASFAA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4443. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71703-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71703-4_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71702-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71703-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics