Abstract
Removing artifacts due to head motion is a preprocessing procedure necessary for any fMRI analysis. In fMRI tool boxes, there have been standard algorithms for correcting motion artifacts. However, those tool boxes fail to indicate the extent to which the correction has been successfully done. Without knowing motion contamination especially after correction, the subsequent analysis using averaged fMRI data across subjects could be misleading. In this study, we proposed seven summary indices for measuring motion artifacts. The indices can be applied after motion correction by the image registration algorithms. In the simulation studies, we analyzed a real fMRI data set using a statistical method and estimated the brain activation maps. The real image data were then randomly shifted or rotated to simulate different degrees of head motion. The data contaminated by random motion were then corrected using the SPM image coregistration algorithms. The indices of motion contamination were computed using the corrected images. The corrected images were then analyzed again using the same statistical method. The consistency between the brain activation maps based on real data and those based on simulated data was used as a standard to evaluate the usefulness of the proposed seven indices. The results show that some indices are informative with regards to the degree of motion contamination in preprocessed fMRI data.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freire, L., Mangin, J.F.: Motion correction algorithms create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion. Neuroimage 14, 709–722 (2001)
Hellier, P., Barillot, C., Corouge, I., Gibaud, B., Le Goualher, G., Collins, D.L., Evans, A., Malandaln, G., Ayache, N., Christensen, G.E., Johnson, H.J.: Retrospective evaluation of intersubject brain registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22, 1120–1130 (2003)
Oakes, T.R., Johnstone, T., Walsh, K.S.O., Greischar, L.L., Alexander, A.L., Fox, A.S., Davidson, R.J.: Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools. Neuroimage 28, 529–543 (2005)
Woods, R.P., Grafton, S.T., Holmes, C.J., Cherry, S.R., Mazziotta, J.C.: Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 22, 139–152 (1998)
Alpert, N.M., Berdichevsky, D., Levin, Z., Morris, E.D., Fischman, A.J.: Improved methods for image registration. Neuroimage 3, 10–18 (1996)
Ghahramani, S.: Fundamentals of Probability, 2nd edn (2000)
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P.: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16, 187–198 (1997)
Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognition 32, 71–86 (1999)
Cohen, J.: Weighted Kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220 (1968)
Cicchetti, D.V., Fleiss, J.L.: Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement 1, 195–201 (1977)
Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Mechelli, A., Friston, K.J., Price, C.J.: The effects of presentation rate during word and pseudoword reading: A comparison of PET and fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 145–156 (2000)
Liou, M., Su, H.R., Lee, J.D., Aston, J.A.D., Tsai, A.C., Cheng, P.E.: A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies. Neuroimage 29, 383–395 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chou, WC., Liou, M., Su, HR. (2008). Sensitivity and Uniformity in Detecting Motion Artifacts. In: Ishikawa, M., Doya, K., Miyamoto, H., Yamakawa, T. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4984. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69158-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69158-7_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69154-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69158-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)