Leveraging Network Performances with IPv6 Multihoming and Multiple Provider-Dependent Aggregatable Prefixes | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Leveraging Network Performances with IPv6 Multihoming and Multiple Provider-Dependent Aggregatable Prefixes

  • Conference paper
Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks (QoS-IP 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 3375))

Abstract

Multihoming, the practice of connecting to multiple providers, is becoming highly popular. Due to the growth of the BGP routing tables in the Internet, IPv6 multihoming is required to preserve the scalability of the interdomain routing system. A proposed method is to assign multiple provider-dependent aggregatable (PA) IPv6 prefixes to each site, instead of a single provider-independent (PI) prefix. This paper shows that the use of multiple PA prefixes per sites not only allows route aggregation but also can be used to reduce end-to-end delay by leveraging the Internet path diversity. We also quantify the gain in path diversity, and show that a dual-homed stub AS that uses multiple PA prefixes has already a better Internet path diversity than any multihomed stub AS that uses a single PI prefix, whatever its number of providers. We claim that the benefits provided by the use of IPv6 multihoming with multiple PA prefixes is an opportunity to develop the support for quality of service and traffic engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huston, G.: BGP Routing Table Analysis Reports (2004), http://bgp.potaroo.net

  2. Agarwal, S., Chuah, C.N., Katz, R.H.: OPCA: Robust interdomain policy routing and traffic control. In: Proceedings OPENARCH (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart, J.W.: BGP4: Inter-Domain Routing in the Internet. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson, R., Floyd, S.: IAB concerns & recommendations regarding internet research & evolution. Internet Draft, IAB, draft-iab-research-funding-03.txt, work in progress (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bu, T., Gao, L., Towsley, D.: On routing table growth. In: Prceedings IEEE Global Internet Symposium (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huitema, C., Draves, R., Bagnulo, M.: Host-centric IPv6 multihoming. Internet Draft, draft-huitema-multi6-hosts-03.txt, work in progress (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huston, G.: Architectural approaches to multi-homing for IPv6. Internet Draft, IETF, draft-ietf-multi6-architecture-02.txt, work in progress (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gao, L.: On inferring autonomous system relationships in the internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 9(6) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Subramanian, L., Agarwal, S., Rexford, J., Katz, R.H.: Characterizing the internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points. In: Proceedings IEEE Infocom (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quoitin, B.: C-BGP - An efficient BGP simulator. (March 2004), http://cbgp.info.ucl.ac.be/

  11. Medina, A., Lakhina, A., Matta, I., Byers, J.: BRITE: An Approach to Universal Topology Generation. In: Proceedings MASCOTS 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jin, C., Chen, Q., Jamin, S.: Inet: Internet topology generator. Technical Report CSE-TR-433-00 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Calvert, K., Doar, M., Zegura, E.: Modeling internet topology. IEEE Communications Magazine (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quoitin, B.: Towards a POP-level Internet topology (2004), http://cbgp.info.ucl.ac.be/itopo/

  15. de Launois, C.: GHITLE. (April 2004), http://openresources.info.ucl.ac.be/ghitle/

  16. de Launois, C.: Leveraging internet path diversity and network performances with IPv6 multihoming (2004), http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/people/delaunoi/diversity/

  17. Bonaventure, O., et al.: Internet traffic engineering. In: Smirnov, M. (ed.) Quality of Future Internet Services. LNCS, vol. 2856, pp. 118–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Akella, A., et al.: A measurement-based analysis of multihoming. In: Proceedings ACM SIGCOMM 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Akella, A., et al.: A comparison of overlay routing and multihoming route control. In: Proceedings ACM SIGCOMM 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fuller, V., Li, T., Yu, J., Varadhan, K.: Classless inter-domain routing (CIDR): an address assignment and aggregation strategy. RFC 1519, IETF (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Launois, C., Quoitin, B., Bonaventure, O. (2005). Leveraging Network Performances with IPv6 Multihoming and Multiple Provider-Dependent Aggregatable Prefixes. In: Ajmone Marsan, M., Bianchi, G., Listanti, M., Meo, M. (eds) Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks. QoS-IP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3375. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30573-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30573-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24557-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30573-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics