An Analysis of Interaction Between Users and Open Government Data Portals in Data Acquisition Process | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An Analysis of Interaction Between Users and Open Government Data Portals in Data Acquisition Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Intelligent Systems (PKAW 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11016))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The rate of development of open government data (OGD) portals has been fast in recent years due to potential benefits of the utilization of OGD. However, scholars have emphasized lack of use as a key problem in the realization of these benefits. Although studies have been carried out to understand decisive factors in OGD utilization from the aspects of either portals or users, they failed to consider the interaction between the two. Therefore, our study carried out an analysis of the interaction between users and OGD portals during users’ data acquisition process from three aspects: data acquisition methods, data quality requirements, and helping functions. We carried out a survey in a Chinese population to collect data for analysis. Results show users’ high acceptance of keyword search as their method for data acquisition through OGD portals but browsing showed higher usage frequency and was a more stable data acquisition behavior. Females show better acceptance of regular recommendations (e.g. RSS) based on their visiting histories than males. Users’ age, education background and occupation affect their demands of different data quality attributes. Our analysis also shows positive relationship between users’ data acquisition habits with their demands of data quality, users’ need of help with their feelings of difficulties in using the portal, and users’ need of help with their demands of data quality. We suggest promoting OGD utilization by offering better helping functions and improving data qualities in future development of OGD portals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attard, J., et al.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lourenço, R.P.: Open government portals assessment: a transparency for accountability perspective. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 62–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Lourenço, R.P.: An analysis of open government portals: a perspective of transparency for accountability. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(3), 323–332 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heise, A., Naumann, F.: Integrating open government data with stratosphere for more transparency. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 14, 45–56 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kassen, M.: A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the Chicago open data project. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 508–513 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruijer, E., et al.: Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 470–480 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, H.-J., Lo, J.: Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 80–88 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity 22, 1–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 38–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Meijer, A., de Hoog, J., van Twist, M., van der Steen, M., Scherpenisse, J.: Understanding the dynamics of open data: from sweeping statements to complex contextual interactions. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (ed.) Open Government. PAIT, vol. 4, pp. 101–114. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Florini, A.: Making transparency work. Glob. Environ. Politics 8(2), 14–16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., Kuhn, J.: Open government objectives and participation motivations. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(1), 30–42 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Willinsky, J.: The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday 10(8) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galitz, W.O.: The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. Wiley, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ubaldi, B., Open government data: towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. In: OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, vol. 22, p. 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Open Difinition. https://opendefinition.org/. Accessed 9 June 2018

  17. OECD: Recommendation of the Council for enhanced access and more effective use of Public Sector Information (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kostovski, M., Jovanovik, M., Trajanov, D.: Open data portal based on semantic web technologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th South East European Doctoral Student Conference. University of Sheffield, Greece (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dix, A.: Human-computer interaction. In: Liu, L., Özsu, M.T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pp. 1327–1331. Springer, Boston (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parycek, P., Hochtl, J., Ginner, M.: Open government data implementation evaluation. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 9(2), 80–99 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Power, R., Robinson, B., Rudd, L., Reeson, A.: Scenario planning case studies using open government data. In: Denzer, R., Argent, R.M., Schimak, G., Hřebíček, J. (eds.) Environmental Software Systems, Infrastructures, Services and Applications, ISESS 2015. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 448, pp. 207–216. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15994-2_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., Manley, L.: Business models for open government data. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., Janssen, M.: Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: An exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries. Inf. Polity 20(1), 19–34 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez-Zapata, F., Heeks, R.: The multiple meanings of open government data: understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 441–452 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitmore, A.: Using open government data to predict war: a case study of data and systems challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(4), 622–630 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Veeckman, C., van der Graaf, S.: The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 5(3) (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Carter, L., Bélanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15(1), 5–25 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q., 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dawes, S.S.: Stewardship and usefulness: policy principles for information-based transparency. Gov. Inf. Q. 27(4), 377–383 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 5–33 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ten Principles for Opening Up Government Information. https://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/ten-open-data-principles/. Accessed 9 June 2018

  34. Methodology - Global Open Data Index. https://index.okfn.org/methodology/. Accessed 9 June 2018

  35. 8 Principles of Open Government Data. https://public.resource.org/8_principles.html. Accessed 9 June 2018

  36. Board, P.S.T. (ed.): Public Data Principles (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. OpenDataBarometer ODB Methodology - v1.0 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Murillo, M.J.: Evaluating the role of online data availability: the case of economic and institutional transparency in sixteen Latin American nations. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 36(1), 42–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Peytchev, A.: Consequences of survey nonresponse. ANNALS Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 645(1), 88–111 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmeets, H., Janssen, J.P.: Using national registrations to correct for selective non-response. Political preference of ethnic groups. Statistics Netherlands (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tavakol, M., Dennick, R.: Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2, 53 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kaiser, H.F.: A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35(4), 401–415 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dziuban, C.D., Shirkey, E.C.: When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol. Bull. 81(6), 358 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Posten, H.O.: The robustness of the two—sample t—test over the Pearson system. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 6(3–4), 295–311 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China

    Di Wang & Chuanfu Chen

  2. Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Di Wang & Deborah Richards

Authors
  1. Di Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deborah Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chuanfu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tsukuba , Tokyo, Japan

    Kenichi Yoshida

  2. Shih Chien University, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Maria Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, D., Richards, D., Chen, C. (2018). An Analysis of Interaction Between Users and Open Government Data Portals in Data Acquisition Process. In: Yoshida, K., Lee, M. (eds) Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Intelligent Systems. PKAW 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11016. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97289-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97289-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97288-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97289-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation