Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Analysis (M-SSDA) for a Culture-Led Regeneration Strategy | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Analysis (M-SSDA) for a Culture-Led Regeneration Strategy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018 (ICCSA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10962))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1807 Accesses

Abstract

The paper presents the elaboration of a culture-led regeneration strategy that is structured through a multi-dimensional and multi-stakeholder decision-making process for the Quartieri Spagnoli (QS), a historic district of the city of Naples (Italy). Beginning with an evaluative approach specific to the deliberative methods, a Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Analysis (M-SSDA) was established. It consisted of three main phases: knowledge, elaboration and evaluation. In the first two phases, the economic, social and urban dynamics that characterise the district have been identified and explored through the selection of some spatial indicators represented with a Geographic Information System (GIS), and three possible alternative scenarios of urban regeneration have been elaborated. In the evaluation phase, a multi-criteria and multi-group assessment of the scenarios was carried out through the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method, and weights were assigned to the spatial indicators using the Weighted Linear Combination method. The result of the decision-making process makes it possible to identify the preferable culture-led regeneration scenario and to draw up a strategic map that identifies potential actions for the scenario implementation. The decision-making process, in its different phases and results, allows making explicit the components that significantly influence the local transformations and that could guide the interaction between the different involved stakeholders towards a shared common vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Musco, F.: Rigenerazione urbana e sostenibilità. Franco Angeli, Milano (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evans, G., Shaw, P.: The contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: a review of evidence. DCMS, vol. 4, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ervet: Cultura&Creatività. Ricchezza per l’Emilia Romagna. Research report, Regione Emilia Romagna, Bologna, Italy (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. KEA: The impact of culture on creativity, a study prepared for the European Commission. Directorate-General for Education and Culture, KEA European Affairs, Brussels, Belgium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Comunian, R.: Rethinking the creative city: the role of complexity, networks and interactions in the urban creative economy. Urban Stud. 48, 1157–1179 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sacco, P.L., Ferilli, G., Tavano Blessi, G.: Sviluppo locale a base culturale: Quando funziona e perché? PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro 1, 9–27 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vickery, J.: The emergence of culture-led regeneration: a policy concept and its discontents. Research papers, vol. 9, pp. 1–105. Centre for Cultural Policy Studies. University of Warwick, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, G.: Cultural Planning: An Urban Renaissance? Routledge, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bianchini, F.: Remaking European cities: the role of cultural policies. In: Bianchini, F., Parkinson, M. (eds.) Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience, pp. 1–19. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grodach, C.: Cultural economy planning in creative cities: discourse and practice. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 37(5), 1747–1765 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, G.: Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Stud. 42, 959–983 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kenter, J.O., O’Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K.N.: What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecol. Econ. 111, 86–99 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodhill, J.: Shaping behaviour: how institutions evolve. Broker 10, 4–8 (2008). http://www.thebrokeronline.eu/Articles/Shaping-behaviour

  14. Cerreta, M., Panaro, S.: From perceived values to shared values: a Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Analysis (M-SSDA) for resilient landscapes. Sustainability 9, 1–20 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mangialardo, A., Micelli, E.: Social capital and public policies for commons: bottom up processes in public real estate property valorization. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 223, 175–180 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spash, C.: Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecol. Econ. 63, 690–699 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Christie, M., Hanley, N., Warren, J., Murphy, K., Wright, R., Hyde, T.: Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol. Econ. 58(2), 304–317 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia, B.: Urban regeneration, arts programming and major events. Int. J. Cult. Policy 10(1), 103–118 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cerreta, M., Poli, G.: Landscape services assessment: a hybrid Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS). Sustainability 9, 1–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Attardi, R., Cerreta, M., Sannicandro, V., Torre, C.M.: Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: the Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index (LUPEI). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264, 491–507 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmeer, K.: Stakeholder analysis guidelines. In: Policy Toolkit for Strengthening Health Sector Reform. World Bank (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saaty, T.L.: Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malczewski, J.: On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: common and best practice approaches. Trans. GIS 4(1), 5–22 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Istat - Istituto Nazionale di Statistica: Dati e indicatori (2011). www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2017

  26. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social (2009). https://gephi.org/users/publications/

  28. Perchinunno, P., Rotondo, F., Torre, C.M.: A multivariate fuzzy analysis for the regeneration of urban poverty areas. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Laganà, A., Taniar, D., Mun, Y., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds.) ICCSA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5072, pp. 137–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69839-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Balena, P., Sannicandro, V., Torre, C.M.: Spatial multicrierial evaluation of soil consumption as a tool for SEA. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8581, pp. 446–458. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09150-1_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonifazi, A., Sannicandro, V., Attardi, R., Di Cugno, G., Torre, C.M.: Countryside vs city: a user-centered approach to open spatial indicators of urban sprawl. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9789, pp. 161–176. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Torre, C.M., Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Saving soil for sustainable land use. Sustainability 9(3), 350, 1–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cerreta, M., Izzo, F. (eds.): Naples culture, creative, community hub: values and synergies network of the historic city. Clean, Naples (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cerreta, M., Daldanise, G.: Community Branding (Co-Bra): a collaborative decision making process for urban regeneration. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10406, pp. 730–746. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Stagl, S.: Valuation for sustainable development: the role of multicriteria evaluation. Q. J. Econ. Res. 73(1), 1–10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Ferretti, V.: Designing adaptive reuse strategies for cultural heritage with choice experiments. In: Stanghellini, S., Morano, P., Bottero, M., Oppio, A. (eds.) Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. GET, pp. 303–315. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Porter, M., Kramer, M.: Creating share value: how to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89, 63–70 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stephenson, J.: The cultural values model: an integrated approach. Landscape Urban Plann. 84, 127–139 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zamagni, S., Zamagni, V.: La cooperazione. Il Mulino, Bologna, Italy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Curto, R., Fregonara, E., Semeraro, P.: Listing behaviour in the Italian real estate market. Int. J. Hous. Markets Anal. 8(1–2), 97–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abastante, F., Lami, I.M., Lombardi, P.: An integrated participative spatial decision support system for smart energy urban scenarios: a financial and economic approach. Buildings 7(4), 1–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bailey, C., Miles, S., Stark, P.: Culture-led urban regeneration and the revitalization of rooted identities in Newcastle, Gateshead and the North East of England. Int. J. Cult. Policy 10(1), 47–65 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miles, S.: Our Tyne’: iconic regeneration and the revitalisation of identity in Newcastle-Gateshead. Urban Stud. 42(5/6), 913–926 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Quinn, B.: Arts festivals and the city. Urban Stud. 42(5/6), 927–943 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Miles, S., Paddison, R.: The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban Stud. 42(5/6), 833–839 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin, C.-Y., Hsing, W.-C.: Culture-led urban regeneration and community mobilisation: the case of the Taipei Bao-an Temple area, Taiwan. Urban Stud. 46(7), 1317–1342 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, via Toledo 402, 80134, Naples, Italy

    Raffaella Amistà & Maria Cerreta

Authors
  1. Raffaella Amistà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Cerreta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cerreta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  4. Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Elena Stankova

  5. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Carmelo M. Torre

  6. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A.C. Rocha

  7. Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

    David Taniar

  8. Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka shi, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  9. Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Eufemia Tarantino

  10. Myongji University, Yongin, Korea (Republic of)

    Yeonseung Ryu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amistà, R., Cerreta, M. (2018). Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Analysis (M-SSDA) for a Culture-Led Regeneration Strategy. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018. ICCSA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95167-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95168-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation