Can You Identify Fake or Authentic Reviews? An fsQCA Approach | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Can You Identify Fake or Authentic Reviews? An fsQCA Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2018

Abstract

This research identifies two types of review patterns, authentic and fake, based on configurations among reviewers and review content elements. We also explain what fake review is with IMT as theoretic background. The results, which are based on the fsQCA method, identify the combinations of configurations for authentic and fake reviews. Each pattern has unique characteristics. Authentic reviews’ patterns are explained by personality theory (i.e., five factor model). Authentic reviews represent personalities that are different, similar to individuals, while fake reviews are composed of three kinds of promotional reviews and are characterized by a reviewer’s low credibility. The fake review pattern is explained by HSM and ELM. This research confirms that different patterns seem to exist for authentic and fake reviews, although authentic reviews may be cited in reverse fake reviews via algorithms. Another finding is that the review business has expanded to the business of social networking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 18875
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 23594
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhattacherjee, A., Sanford, C.: Influence processes for information technology acceptance: an elaboration likelihood model. MIS Q. 805–825 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, K.A., Ellis, R., Loftus, E.F.: Make my memory: how advertising can change our memories of the past. Psychol. Mark. 19(1), 1–23 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantallops, A.S., Salvi, F.: New consumer behavior: a review of research on eWOM and hotels. Int. J. Hospitality Manage. 36, 41–51 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, G.T., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., Wolf, S., Klein, H.J., Gardner, P.D.: Organizational socialization: its content and consequences. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(5), 730 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filieri, R.: What makes an online consumer review trustworthy? Ann. Tourism Res. 58, 46–64 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P.C.: Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 54(2), 393–420 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W.L., Gabriel, S., Lee, A.Y.: “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychol. Sci. 10(4), 321–326 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds.) Speech acts, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannover, B., Kuhnen, U.: Culture, context, and cognition: The semantic procedural interface model of the self. European Review of Social Psychology 15(1), 297–333 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalwani, A.K., Shrum, L.J., Chiu, C.Y.: Motivated response styles: the role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96(4), 870 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T.R. (ed.): Encyclopedia of deception. Sage Publications, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • LIWC.: How it works. LIWC website: Available at SSRN: http://liwc.wpengine.com/how-it-works/ (2017). Accessed on 05 Sept 2017

  • Luca, M., Zervas, G.: Fake it till you make it: reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Manage. Sci. 62(12), 3412–3427 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., Chevalier, J.: Promotional reviews: an empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Am. Econ. Rev. 104(8), 2421–2455 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCornack, S.A.: The generation of deceptive messages: laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception. In: Greene, J.O. (ed.) Message Production: Advances in Communication Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., Glance, N.: Fake review detection: classification and analysis of real and pseudo reviews. Technical Report UIC-CS-2013–03. University of Illinois at Chicago, Tech. Rep (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P.: User-generated content and travel: a case study on Tripadvisor. com. Inf. Commun. Technol. Tourism. 47–58 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C., Kozlowski, S.W.: Organizational socialization as a learning process: the role of information acquisition. Pers. Psychol. 45(4), 849–874 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 309–319 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, I.O., Kourouthanassis, P.E., Giannakos, M.N., Chrissikopoulos, V.: Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: the role of cognitive and affective perceptions. J. Bus. Res. 69(2), 794–803 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, I., Picoto, W.N.: Configurational analysis of firms’ performance: understanding the role of Internet financial reporting. J. Bus. Res. 69(11), 5360–5365 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B., Ragin, C.C.: Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques, vol. 51. Sage Publications, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S.H., Knafo, A.: The big five personality factors and personal values. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28(6), 789–801 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T.F., Llopis-Martinez, J.: An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: a bibliometric analysis. J. Innov. Knowl. 2(1), 15–23 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo, J.M.C.: Enablers and restrictors of mobile banking app use: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). J. Bus. Res. 69(11), 5456–5460 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A.G.: Moving Beyond Multiple Regression Analysis to Algorithms: Calling for Adoption of a Paradigm Shift from Symmetric to Asymmetric Thinking in Data Analysis and Crafting Theory (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A.G., Zhang, M.: Identifying x-consumers using causal recipes: “whales” and “jumbo shrimps” casino gamblers. J. Gambl. Stud. 28(1), 13–26 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woollacott, E.: Amazon’s Fake Review Problem is Now Worse than Ever. Forbes: Available at SRRN: https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2017/09/09/exclusive-amazons-fake-review-problem-is-now-worse-than-ever/#1fbadfd27c0f (2017). Accessed on 10 Sept 2017

  • Xie, X., Fang, L., Zeng, S.: Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: a fsQCA approach. J. Bus. Res. 69(11), 5210–5215 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., Yuan, Y., Zhang, N.: Predicting Yelp Ratings Using User Friendship Network Information. Available at SSRN: http://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/efca/0250f18603eeb67f23a5e688591921c25f6a.pdf (2015). Accessed on 05 Sept 2017

  • Yeung, L.N., Levine, T.R., Nishiyama, K.: Information manipulation theory and perceptions of deception in Hong Kong. Commun. Rep. 12(1), 1–11 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelp: Dataset Challenge. Yelp Website: Available at SSRN: https://www.yelp.com/dataset_challenge (2017a). Accessed on 05 Sept 2017

  • Yelp: Fake Reivews on Yelp? Don’t Worry we’ve Got Your Back. Yelp Blog: Available at SSRN: https://www.yelpblog.com/2013/09/fake-reviews-on-yelp-dont-worry-weve-got-your-back (2017b). Accessed on 05 Sept 2017

  • Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Kehoe, J.L., Kilic, I.Y.: What online reviewer behaviors really matter? Effects of verbal and nonverbal behaviors on detection of fake online reviews. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 33(2), 456–481 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K.Z., Zhao, S.J., Cheung, C.M., Lee, M.K.: Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers’ decision-making: a heuristic–systematic model. Decis. Support Syst. 67, 78–89 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Watts, S.A.: Capitalizing on content: information adoption in two online communities. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(2), 73 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016S1A3A2925146).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chulmo Koo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lee, K., Ham, J., Yang, SB., Koo, C. (2018). Can You Identify Fake or Authentic Reviews? An fsQCA Approach. In: Stangl, B., Pesonen, J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72923-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics