An Evaluation Tool of the Effect of Robots in Eldercare on the Sense of Safety and Security | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

An Evaluation Tool of the Effect of Robots in Eldercare on the Sense of Safety and Security

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10652))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of the study presented in this paper is to develop a quantitative evaluation tool of the sense of safety and security for robots in eldercare. By investigating the literature on measurement of safety and security in human-robot interaction, we propose new evaluation tools. These tools are semantic differential scale questionnaires. In experimental validation, we used the Pepper robot, programmed in the way to exhibit social behaviors, and constructed four experimental conditions varying the degree of the robot’s non-verbal behaviors from no gestures at all to full head and hand movements. The experimental results suggest that both questionnaires (for the sense of safety and the sense of security) have good internal consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pepper. https://www.ald.softbankrobotics.com/en/cool-robots/pepper. Accessed 30 June 2017

  2. Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Social Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bicchi, A., Peshkin, M.A., Colgate, J.E.: Safety for physical human-robot interaction. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1335–1348. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boholm, M., Möller, N., Hansson, S.O.: The concepts of risk, safety, and security: applications in everyday language. Risk Anal. 36, 320–338 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cortellessa, G., Scopelliti, M., Tiberio, L., Svedberg, G.K., Loutfi, A., Pecora, F.: A cross-cultural evaluation of domestic assistive robots. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems, pp. 24–31 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walters, M.L., et al.: Evaluating the robot personality and verbal behavior of domestic robots using video-based studies. Adv. Robot. 25(18), 2233–2254 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischinger, D., Einramhof, P., Papoutsakis, K., Wohlkinger, W., Mayer, P., Panek, P., Hofmann, S., Koertner, T., Weiss, A., Argyros, A., et al.: Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and lessons learned. Robot. Auton. Syst. 75, 60–78 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fonad, E., Wahlin, T.B.R., Heikkila, K., Emami, A.: Moving to and living in a retirement home: focusing on elderly people’s sense of safety and security. J. Hous. Elder. 20(3), 45–60 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haddadin, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Safe physical human-robot interaction: measurements, analysis and new insights. In: Kaneko, M., Nakamura, Y. (eds.) Robotics Research. STAR, vol. 66, pp. 395–407. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int. J. Social Robot. 2(4), 361–375 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamide, H., Mae, Y., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., Hirose, M., Arai, T.: New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 49–56. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kornecki, A.J., Liu, M.: Fault tree analysis for safety/security verification in aviation software. Electronics 2(1), 41–56 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lasota, P.A., Rossano, G.F., Shah, J.A.: Toward safe close-proximity human-robot interaction with standard industrial robots. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pp. 339–344. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenthäler, C., Lorenzy, T., Kirsch, A.: Influence of legibility on perceived safety in a virtual human-robot path crossing task. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE ROMAN, pp. 676–681. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maslow, A.H.: A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50(4), 370–396 (1943)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nonaka, S., Inoue, K., Arai, T., Mae, Y.: Evaluation of human sense of security for coexisting robots using virtual reality. 1st report: evaluation of pick and place motion of humanoid robots. In: Proceedings 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2004, vol. 3, pp. 2770–2775. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Piètre-Cambacédès, L., Chaudet, C.: The SEMA referential framework: avoiding ambiguities in the terms security and safety. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 3(2), 55–66 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Russell, J.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Theodoridis, T., Hu, H.: Toward intelligent security robots: a survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 42(6), 1219–1230 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss, A., Bartneck, C.: Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed questionnaire series. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), pp. 381–388. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wyrobek, K.A., Berger, E.H., Van der Loos, H.F.M., Salisbury, J.K.: Towards a personal robotics development platform: rationale and design of an intrinsically safe personal robot. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2165–2170, May 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neziha Akalin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akalin, N., Kiselev, A., Kristoffersson, A., Loutfi, A. (2017). An Evaluation Tool of the Effect of Robots in Eldercare on the Sense of Safety and Security. In: Kheddar, A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10652. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70021-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70022-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics