Relevant Fact Selection for QA via Sequence Labeling | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Relevant Fact Selection for QA via Sequence Labeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10412))

  • 1947 Accesses

Abstract

Question answering (QA) is a very important, but not yet completely resolved problem in artificial intelligence. Solving the QA problem consists of two major steps: relevant fact selection and answering the question. Existing methods usually combine the two steps to solve the problem. A major technique is to add a memory component to infer answers from the chaining facts. It is not very clear how irrelevant facts affect the effectiveness of these methods. In this paper, we propose to separate the two steps and only consider the problem of relevant fact selection. We used a graphical probabilistic model Conditional Random Field (CRF) to model the interdependent relationship among the chaining facts in order to select the relevant ones. In our experiments on a benchmark dataset, we are able to select correctly all relevant facts from 13 tasks out of 19 tasks (F-scores of the rest of the 6 tasks range from 0.8 to 0.97). We also show that using our selector to pre-select relevant facts can substantially improve the accuracies of existing QA systems (e.g. MemN2N (from 88% to 94%) and LSTM (from 66% to 91%) in 13 tasks with complete information).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the bAbI dataset, the number of words is limited (less than 200 in one task) such that we just use an integer to represent the word ID in our experiment. Some complex word representation technics such as word embedding can be utilized when the number of words in the corpus increases.

  2. 2.

    Any noun in q, normally, the meaning of sentences carried by the nouns in the sentences.

  3. 3.

    The experiments are based on the public source code https://github.com/facebook/MemNN.

  4. 4.

    The experiments are based on the public source code https://github.com/fchollet/keras.

References

  1. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555 (2014)

  2. Iyyer, M., Boyd-Graber, J.L., Claudino, L.M.B., Socher, R., Daumé III, H.: A neural network for factoid question answering over paragraphs. In: EMNLP, pp. 633–644 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jozefowicz, R., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I.: An empirical exploration of recurrent network architectures. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-15), pp. 2342–2350 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar, A., Irsoy, O., Su, J., Bradbury, J., English, R., Pierce, B., Ondruska, P., Gulrajani, I., Socher, R.: Ask me anything: dynamic memory networks for natural language processing. CoRR, abs/1506.07285 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, D., Pantel, P.: Discovery of inference rules for question-answering. Nat. Lang. Eng. 7(04), 343–360 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Cernockỳ, J., Khudanpur, S.: Recurrent neural network based language model. In: Interspeech, vol. 2, p. 3 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peng, B., Lu, Z., Li, H., Wong, K.F.: Towards neural network-based reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.05508 (2015)

  8. Qiu, X., Huang, X.: Convolutional neural tensor network architecture for community-based question answering. In: IJCAI, pp. 1305–1311 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ravichandran, D., Hovy, E.: Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 41–47. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sukhbaatar, S., Weston, J., Fergus, R., et al.: End-to-end memory networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2440–2448 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sundermeyer, M., Schlüter, R., Ney, H.: LSTM neural networks for language modeling. In: Interspeech, pp. 194–197 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton, C., McCallum, A.: An introduction to conditional random fields for relational learning. Introduction to statistical relational learning, pp. 93–128 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tu, W., Cheung, D.W.L., Mamoulis, N., Yang, M., Lu, Z.: Real-time detection and sorting of news on microblogging platforms. In: PACLIC (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weston, J., Bordes, A., Chopra, S., Rush, A.M., van Merriënboer, B., Joulin, A., Mikolov, T.: Towards AI-complete question answering: a set of prerequisite toy tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05698 (2015)

  15. Weston, J., Chopra, S., Bordes, A.: Memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3916 (2014)

  16. Wu, H., Wu, W., Zhou, M., Chen, E., Duan, L., Shum, H.Y.: Improving search relevance for short queries in community question answering. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 43–52. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, M., Chow, K.-P.: An Information Extraction Framework for Digital Forensic Investigations. In: Peterson, G., Shenoi, S. (eds.) DigitalForensics 2015. IAICT, vol. 462, pp. 61–76. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24123-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, M., Tu, W., Yin, W., Lu, Z.: Deep Markov neural network for sequential data classification. In: The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, K., Wu, W., Wu, H., Li, Z., Zhou, M.: Question retrieval with high quality answers in community question answering. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 371–380. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liang, Y., Zhu, J., Li, Y., Yang, M., Yiu, S.M. (2017). Relevant Fact Selection for QA via Sequence Labeling. In: Li, G., Ge, Y., Zhang, Z., Jin, Z., Blumenstein, M. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10412. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63558-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63558-3_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63557-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63558-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics