Abstract
Computation-based human reliability analysis (CoBHRA) provides the opportunity for dynamic modeling of human actions and their impacts on the state of the nuclear power plant. Central to this dynamic HRA approach is a representation of the human operator comprised of actions and the time course over which those actions are performed. The success or failure of tasks is time dependent, and therefore modeling different times at which the operator completes actions helps predict how timing differences affect the human error potential for a given task. To model the operators’ timing variability, Goals, Operators, Methods, and Selection rules (GOMS) task level primitives were developed based on simulator logs of operators completing multiple scenarios. The logs have sufficient detail to determine the timing information for procedure steps and to map the procedure steps into the task level primitives. The task level primitives can then be applied to other procedures that were not evaluated, since they represent generic task level actions applicable to all procedure steps. With these generic task level primitives, untested scenarios can be dynamically modeled in CoBHRA, which expands the usefulness of the approach considerably. An example is provided of a station blackout scenario, which demonstrates how the operator timing of task level primitives can enhance our understanding of human error in nuclear process control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boring, R., Mandelli, D., Joe, J., Smith, C., Groth, K.: A Research Roadmap for Computation-Based Human Reliability Analysis, INL/EXT-15-36051. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls (2015)
Joe, J.C., Shirley, R.B., Mandelli, D., Boring, R.L., Smith, C.L.: The development of dynamic human reliability analysis simulations for inclusion in risk informed safety margin characterization frameworks. Procedia Manufact. 3, 1305–1311 (2015)
Forester, J., Dang, V.N., Bye, A., Lois, E., Massaiu, S., Broberg, H., Braarud, P.Ø., Boring, R., Männistö, I., Liao, H., Julius, J., Parry, G., Nelson, P.: The International HRA Empirical Study. Lessons Learned from Comparing HRA Methods Predictions to HAMMLAB Simulator Data, NUREG-2127. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (2014)
Boring, R.L., Rasmussen, M.: GOMS-HRA: a method for treating subtasks in dynamic human reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2016 European Safety and Reliability Conference (2016)
Card, S.K., Newell, A., Moran, T.P.: The psychology of human-computer interaction (1983)
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J.: Interaction Design. Wiley, New York (2002)
Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering at a discount. In: Salvendy, G., Smith, M.J. (eds.) Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems, pp. 394–401. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1989)
Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Commun. ACM 23(7), 396–410 (1980)
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Rafferty, L.A., Walker, G.H., Baber, C.: Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design, 2nd edn. Ashgate Publishing Co., Aldershot (2013)
Boring, R.L.: Defining human failure events for petroleum applications of human reliability analysis. Procedia Manufact. 3, 1335–1342 (2015)
Boring, R., Lew, R., Ulrich, T., Joe, J.: Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program Operator Performance Metrics for Control Room Modernization: A Practical Guide for Early Design Evaluation, INL/EXT-14-31511. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls (2014)
Procedure Professionals Association: Procedure Writers’ Manual (PPA AP-907-005, Rev. 2) (2016)
Jang, T.I., Lee, Y.H., Park, J.C., Jeong, Y.S., Chu, G.I.: Standardization of the Action Verbs used in Emergency Operating Procedures of NPPs (2010)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Cutis Smith and Diego Mandelli of the Idaho National Laboratory for their exceptional contributions to this research. This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ulrich, T., Boring, R., Ewing, S., Rasmussen, M. (2018). Operator Timing of Task Level Primitives for Use in Computation-Based Human Reliability Analysis. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 589. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60644-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60645-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)