Synonyms
Learning Models
The ever-lurking question that has always engaged educators is what drives students to effectively learn and excel. In their review of the literature, Zhang and Ziegler (2016) reported that although there is a plethora of cognitive, personality, and other narrower traits that contribute to student performance however, meta-analyses have always shown that personality traits that are based on the Big Five (BF) factor model (in particular openness and conscientiousness where conscientiousness was the most powerful predictor across the secondary and tertiary levels followed by openness) contribute to the prediction of student success above and beyond intelligence. The BF are five important factors that are used to describe human personality and behavior, and it is indicated to capture most of individual’s daily differences in behavioral patterns and performance in many domains (Babakhani 2014;...
References
Babakhani N (2014) The relationship between the big-five model of personality, self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance of Islamic Azad University students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 116:3542–3547. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences – WCES 2013
Barbaranelli C, Caprara G, Rabasca A, Pastorelli C (2003) A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personal Individ Differ 34(4):645–664
Barbaranelli C, Borgogni L, Perugini M (1993) The Big Five questionnaire: a new questionnaire for the measurement of the five factor model. Personal Individ Differ 15:281–288
Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa
De Feyter T, Caers R, Vigna C, Berings D (2012) Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learn Individ Differ 22:439–448
Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol 41:417–440
Graham S (2006) Listening comprehension: the learners’ perspective. System 34(2):165–182
Hwang M, Liu M, Ho H, Chen Y (2014) Using a “prediction–observation–explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their Internet cognitive failure. Comput Educ 72:110–120
Jensen-Campbell L, Knack J, Waldrip A, Campbell S (2007) Do Big Five personality traits associated with self-control influence the regulation of anger and aggression? J Res Pers 41(2):403–424
John O, Srivastava S (2001) The Big-Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin L, John OP (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2nd edn. Guilford, New York
Kinga R, McInerneyb D, Watkinsa D (2012) Competitiveness is not that bad…at least in the east: testing the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in the Asian setting. Int J Intercult Relat 36(6):446–457
Lynn J (2009) Learning orientations: diversity in higher education. Learn Individ Differ 19(2):195–208
Peetsma T, Van der Veen I (2011) Relations between the development of future time perspective in three life domains, investment in learning, and academic achievement. Learn Instr 21(3):481–494
Swinton O (2010) The effect of effort grading on learning. Econ Educ Rev 29(6):1176–1182
Vedel A (2014) The Big Five and tertiary academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Personal Individ Differ 71:66–76
Zhang J, Ziegler M (2016) How do the big five influence scholastic performance? A big five-narrow traits model or a double mediation model. Learn Individ Differ 50:93–102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Al-Qirim, N. et al. (2020). Innate Abilities and Learning in Higher Education. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_220-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_220-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0
eBook Packages: Living Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering