Integration of Game Theory in $$R^{2}$$ -IBN Framework for Conflict Resolution in a Multi-agents Model of an Extended Enterprise | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Integration of Game Theory in \(R^{2}\)-IBN Framework for Conflict Resolution in a Multi-agents Model of an Extended Enterprise

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2016) (HIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 552))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1090 Accesses

Abstract

This paper aims to improve the argument based negotiation framework \(R^{2}\)-IBN to overcome the cooperation problem within the extended enterprise by the agent-oriented model named MAIS-\(E^{2}\). In order to overcome the problem of cooperation in general and conflict resolution which prevent this practice in particular, we propose as a solution the integration of game theory foundations into two modules of \(R^{2}\)-IBN framework which are: “Argument Evaluation” module and “Argument selection” module. Finally, we expose the evaluation and the validation of our work through the use of a port application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 22879
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 28599
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that a negotiation cycle means that agent sends a proposal and the opponent Agent answers it.

  2. 2.

    Note that in “Argument selection” module the strategic form game represents the candidates arguments of the Mediator Agent which will be grafted in the proposal to be sent to the opponent Agent on the one hand and the arguments received on the other hand.

  3. 3.

    The correlated equilibrium is a generalization of the concept of Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies.

References

  1. Villarreal Lizárraga, C.L., Dupont, L., Gourc, D., Pingaud, H.: Contributing to management of shared projects in SMEs clusters. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Production Research, Salerno, Italy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hsairi, L., Ghédira, K., Alimi, A.M., Ben Abdellhafid, A.: MAIS-\(E^{2}\) model and \(R^{2}\)-IBN framework: port application case. In: Industrial and Logistics Systems, (SIL 2010), Marrakech (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellaaj, S.: Adaptation to the risks of outsourcing strategies: Tunisian industrial companies case. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sfax (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rasmusen, E.: Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory, 4th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2006). 582 p.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hans, P.: Game Theory a Multi-Leveled Approach, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahwan, I., Larson, K.: Argumentation and Game Theory. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 321–339. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hadidi, N.: Unification of Argumentation and Game Theory for Automated Negotiation. Ph.D. thesis, University Paris Descartes (Paris 5) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mbarki, M., Marey, O., Sultan, K.: Agent types and adaptive negotiation strategies in argumentation-based negotiation. In: 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), pp. 485–492 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hsairi, L., Ghédira, K., Alimi, A.M., Benabdelhafid, A.: Resolution of conflicts via argument based negotiation: Extended enterprise case. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management (IEEE/SSSM06), pp. 828–833. Université de Technologie de Troyes, France (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zadeh, L.A.: Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Inf. Sci. 178(13), 2751–2779 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugeno, M., Kang, G.: Structure identification of fuzzy models. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 28, 15–33 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Higher Institute of Computer Science of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia

    Alaeddine Dronga & Lobna Hsairi

  2. Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Lobna Hsairi

  3. Higher Institute of Management of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia

    Khaled Ghedira

Authors
  1. Alaeddine Dronga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lobna Hsairi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khaled Ghedira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alaeddine Dronga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. (MIR Labs), Machine Intelligence Research Labs, Auburn, Washington, USA

    Ajith Abraham

  2. Hassan 1st University, Settat, Morocco

    Abdelkrim Haqiq

  3. ENIS, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

    Adel M. Alimi

  4. Technopolis Rabat-Shore Rocade, International University of Rabat, Sala el Jadida, Morocco

    Ghita Mezzour

  5. Inst Applied Dept of Electronics, Taffala, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia

    Nizar Rokbani

  6. Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikas, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Durian Tunggal, Malaysia

    Azah Kamilah Muda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dronga, A., Hsairi, L., Ghedira, K. (2017). Integration of Game Theory in \(R^{2}\)-IBN Framework for Conflict Resolution in a Multi-agents Model of an Extended Enterprise. In: Abraham, A., Haqiq, A., Alimi, A., Mezzour, G., Rokbani, N., Muda, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2016). HIS 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 552. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52941-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52941-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52941-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation