Analyzing the Academic Approaches to Learning of Portuguese College Students Through the Psychometric Study of a Questionnaire | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Analyzing the Academic Approaches to Learning of Portuguese College Students Through the Psychometric Study of a Questionnaire

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 583))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1078 Accesses

Abstract

Background: Assessing the college students’ more often utilized approaches to learning, as they are understood by Biggs and his collaborators could be paramount to infer the way students learn. Such knowledge can be fundamental for the academic community, particularly when considering that the option for a deep approach to learning as opposed to a surface approach is often considered connected to a more significant learning. Aim: The present study focused on the adaptation and validation of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) [1] for the Portuguese college student population. Method: This study involved the participation of 241 male and 466 female college students and internet users, whose ages ranged between 18 and 40 years old (M = 22.96; SD = 4.41).

To be included in this research the participants had to: (1) be Portuguese and study in a Portuguese college institution, and (2) be willing to participate after learning the research objectives. Participants were recruited through direct contact with college institutions in Portugal and through informal social networks. Additionally the eligible internet users who agreed to participate were asked to refer their friends to participate in the study.

Besides the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) [1], a socio-demographic questionnaire was able used to enable the characterization of the participants’ age, gender, degree and University/college attendance;

Results: The Portuguese version of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire, unlike the original version which had 20 items only has 16 items. Furthermore, the factor analysis with varimax orthogonal rotation revealed a two factor structure, consistent with other researches of the instrument, but unlike the original’s four factor structure. In the Portuguese version found in this study, factor I (deep approach to learning) has a 9 items scope, and includes deep motives and deep strategies (α = .783); factor II (surface approach to learning) has a 7 items scope and includes surface motives and surface strategies (α = .751). Besides the validation of the questionnaire for the Portuguese learning, this research also focused in the separate analysis of deep and surface approaches, namely in what distinguished them in terms of age, gender and academic degree, and it was found that in all cases a significant statistical difference was found. This study help conclude that the Portuguese Revised Study Processes Questionnaire is an acceptable measure of the college student’s learning approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biggs, J.B., Kember, D., Leung, D.Y.P.: The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 71, 133–149 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biggs, J.B.: The role of metalearning in study processes. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 55(3), 185–212 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biggs, J.: What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 18(1), 55 (1999). Routledge

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kember, D., Charlesworth, M., Davies, H., McKay, J., Stott, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: using the study process questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Stud. Educ. Eval. 23(2), 141–157 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biggs, J.: Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. High. Educ. 8, 381–394 (1979). Springer Magazine. Elsevier scientific publishing company. Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marton, F., Saljö, R.: On qualitative differences in learning: I - outcome and process. Br. J. Psychol. 46(4), 4–11 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marton, F., Saljö, R.: On qualitative differences in learning: II - outcome as a function of the learners conception of the task. Br. J. Psychol. 46(4), 115–127 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamm, S., Robertson, I.: Preferences for deep-surface learning: a vocational education case study using a multimedia assessment activity. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 26(7), 951–965 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Biggs, J.: Teaching for quality learning at university. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alharbi, A., Paul, D., Henskens, F., Hannaford, M.: An investigation into the learning styles and self- regulated learning strategies for computer science students. In: Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, pp. 36–46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gomes, C.M.A.: Abordagem profunda e abordagem superficial à aprendizagem: diferentes perspectivas do rendimento escolar. Psicologia: reflexão e crítica 24(3), 479–488 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Figueiredo, F.J.C.: Como ajudar os alunos a estudar e a pensar?: Auto-regulação da aprendizagem. Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, RE, 34, Ed. Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Abril, pp. 233–258 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valadas, S.T., Gonçalves, F.R., Faísca, L.: Estudo de tradução, adaptação e validação do ASSIST numa amostra de estudantes universitários portugueses. Revista Portuguesa de Educação 22(2), 191–217 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hernández, P.F., Sanz, M.P.G., Martínez, P.C., Hervás, R.M.A., Maquilón, J.S.: Consistencia entre motivos y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudantes universitários. Revista de Investigación Educativa 20(2), 487–510 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leung, M.-T., Chan, K.-W.: Construct validity and psychometric properties of the revised two- factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) in the Hong Kong context. Melbourne Australian Association for Research in Education. Paper presented at the AARE 2001 conference, 2–6 December, 2001 at the Notre Dame University, Perth, Australia (2001). http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/cha01708.htm. Consultado a 30 July 2014

  16. Gargallo, B., Garfella, P.R., Pérez, C.: Enfoques de aprendizaje y rendimento académico en estudiantes universitarios. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía 58(3), 45–57 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phan, H.P.: Examination of student learning approaches, reflective thinking, and epistemological beliefs: a latent variables approach. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 10(4(3)), 577–610 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phan, H.P., Deo, B.: Revisiting the South Pacific approaches to learning: a confirmatory factor analysis study. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 27(4), 371–383 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DeVellis, R.F.: Scale development: theory and applications. J. Educ. Meas. 31(1), 79–82 (1991). Spring, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marôco, J.: Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics 5ª edição (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ford, J.K., MacCallum, R.C., Tait, M.: The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: a critical review and analysis. Pers. Psychol. 39(2), 291–314 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lublin, J.: Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. Centre for Teaching and Learning - Good Practice in Teaching and Learning, Dublin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork, R.: Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest. J. Assoc. Psychol. Sci. 9(3), 106–116 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. de Souza, R.B. de L., de Souza, L.N.: Um mergulho nos aspectos da aprendizagem profunda nos cursos de ciências contábeis do brasil. Revista de negócios – Business review 9, March 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the FCT project UID/EEA/50008/2013 (Este trabalho foi suportado pelo projecto FCT UID/EEA/50008/2013).

The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution of the COST Action IC1303–AAPELE–Architectures, Algorithms and Protocols for Enhanced Living Environments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oliveira, D., Esgalhado, G., Garcia, N.M. (2016). Analyzing the Academic Approaches to Learning of Portuguese College Students Through the Psychometric Study of a Questionnaire. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds) Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29584-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29585-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics