Abstract
Background: Assessing the college students’ more often utilized approaches to learning, as they are understood by Biggs and his collaborators could be paramount to infer the way students learn. Such knowledge can be fundamental for the academic community, particularly when considering that the option for a deep approach to learning as opposed to a surface approach is often considered connected to a more significant learning. Aim: The present study focused on the adaptation and validation of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) [1] for the Portuguese college student population. Method: This study involved the participation of 241 male and 466 female college students and internet users, whose ages ranged between 18 and 40 years old (M = 22.96; SD = 4.41).
To be included in this research the participants had to: (1) be Portuguese and study in a Portuguese college institution, and (2) be willing to participate after learning the research objectives. Participants were recruited through direct contact with college institutions in Portugal and through informal social networks. Additionally the eligible internet users who agreed to participate were asked to refer their friends to participate in the study.
Besides the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) [1], a socio-demographic questionnaire was able used to enable the characterization of the participants’ age, gender, degree and University/college attendance;
Results: The Portuguese version of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire, unlike the original version which had 20 items only has 16 items. Furthermore, the factor analysis with varimax orthogonal rotation revealed a two factor structure, consistent with other researches of the instrument, but unlike the original’s four factor structure. In the Portuguese version found in this study, factor I (deep approach to learning) has a 9 items scope, and includes deep motives and deep strategies (α = .783); factor II (surface approach to learning) has a 7 items scope and includes surface motives and surface strategies (α = .751). Besides the validation of the questionnaire for the Portuguese learning, this research also focused in the separate analysis of deep and surface approaches, namely in what distinguished them in terms of age, gender and academic degree, and it was found that in all cases a significant statistical difference was found. This study help conclude that the Portuguese Revised Study Processes Questionnaire is an acceptable measure of the college student’s learning approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biggs, J.B., Kember, D., Leung, D.Y.P.: The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 71, 133–149 (2001)
Biggs, J.B.: The role of metalearning in study processes. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 55(3), 185–212 (1985)
Biggs, J.: What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 18(1), 55 (1999). Routledge
Kember, D., Charlesworth, M., Davies, H., McKay, J., Stott, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: using the study process questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Stud. Educ. Eval. 23(2), 141–157 (1994)
Biggs, J.: Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. High. Educ. 8, 381–394 (1979). Springer Magazine. Elsevier scientific publishing company. Amsterdam
Marton, F., Saljö, R.: On qualitative differences in learning: I - outcome and process. Br. J. Psychol. 46(4), 4–11 (1976)
Marton, F., Saljö, R.: On qualitative differences in learning: II - outcome as a function of the learners conception of the task. Br. J. Psychol. 46(4), 115–127 (1976)
Hamm, S., Robertson, I.: Preferences for deep-surface learning: a vocational education case study using a multimedia assessment activity. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 26(7), 951–965 (2010)
Biggs, J.: Teaching for quality learning at university. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)
Alharbi, A., Paul, D., Henskens, F., Hannaford, M.: An investigation into the learning styles and self- regulated learning strategies for computer science students. In: Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, pp. 36–46 (2011)
Gomes, C.M.A.: Abordagem profunda e abordagem superficial à aprendizagem: diferentes perspectivas do rendimento escolar. Psicologia: reflexão e crítica 24(3), 479–488 (2011)
Figueiredo, F.J.C.: Como ajudar os alunos a estudar e a pensar?: Auto-regulação da aprendizagem. Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, RE, 34, Ed. Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Abril, pp. 233–258 (2008)
Valadas, S.T., Gonçalves, F.R., Faísca, L.: Estudo de tradução, adaptação e validação do ASSIST numa amostra de estudantes universitários portugueses. Revista Portuguesa de Educação 22(2), 191–217 (2009)
Hernández, P.F., Sanz, M.P.G., Martínez, P.C., Hervás, R.M.A., Maquilón, J.S.: Consistencia entre motivos y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudantes universitários. Revista de Investigación Educativa 20(2), 487–510 (2002)
Leung, M.-T., Chan, K.-W.: Construct validity and psychometric properties of the revised two- factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) in the Hong Kong context. Melbourne Australian Association for Research in Education. Paper presented at the AARE 2001 conference, 2–6 December, 2001 at the Notre Dame University, Perth, Australia (2001). http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/cha01708.htm. Consultado a 30 July 2014
Gargallo, B., Garfella, P.R., Pérez, C.: Enfoques de aprendizaje y rendimento académico en estudiantes universitarios. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía 58(3), 45–57 (2006)
Phan, H.P.: Examination of student learning approaches, reflective thinking, and epistemological beliefs: a latent variables approach. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 10(4(3)), 577–610 (2006)
Phan, H.P., Deo, B.: Revisiting the South Pacific approaches to learning: a confirmatory factor analysis study. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 27(4), 371–383 (2008)
DeVellis, R.F.: Scale development: theory and applications. J. Educ. Meas. 31(1), 79–82 (1991). Spring, 1994
Marôco, J.: Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics 5ª edição (2011)
Ford, J.K., MacCallum, R.C., Tait, M.: The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: a critical review and analysis. Pers. Psychol. 39(2), 291–314 (1986)
Lublin, J.: Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. Centre for Teaching and Learning - Good Practice in Teaching and Learning, Dublin (2003)
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork, R.: Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest. J. Assoc. Psychol. Sci. 9(3), 106–116 (2008)
de Souza, R.B. de L., de Souza, L.N.: Um mergulho nos aspectos da aprendizagem profunda nos cursos de ciências contábeis do brasil. Revista de negócios – Business review 9, March 2010
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the FCT project UID/EEA/50008/2013 (Este trabalho foi suportado pelo projecto FCT UID/EEA/50008/2013).
The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution of the COST Action IC1303–AAPELE–Architectures, Algorithms and Protocols for Enhanced Living Environments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Oliveira, D., Esgalhado, G., Garcia, N.M. (2016). Analyzing the Academic Approaches to Learning of Portuguese College Students Through the Psychometric Study of a Questionnaire. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds) Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29584-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29585-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)