Paper or Electronic: Preferences of Slovenian Students | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Paper or Electronic: Preferences of Slovenian Students

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability (ECIL 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 552))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents Slovenia’s results as part of an international study investigating student preferences of class readings regarding format (print or electronic) and factors impacting these preferences and behaviours. Common beliefs are that digital media is about to prevail over print materials, but several studies have found the contrary: most students still prefer print format over digital for their academic readings. They feel their comprehension and retention is better in print, but they like the convenience and accessibility of electronic. This issue is relevant to both libraries and teachers and instructors. The main research question of this study is: What are students’ format preferences when engaging with their academic readings? Secondary questions ask about the factors that impact their behaviors. An online survey of 25 questions was distributed in spring 2015 to students in different disciplines and levels at three public universities. Results were obtained using descriptive statistical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wästlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T., Archer, T.: Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: psychological and physiological factors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21(2), 377–394 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mangen, A., Bente, R.W., Kolbjørn, B.: Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: effects on reading comprehension. Int. J. Educ. Res. 58, 61–68 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T., Zheng, X., Huang, R.: A comparison of reading comprehension across aaper, computer screens, and tablets: does tablet familiarity matter? J. Comput. Educ. 1(2–3), 213–225 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ackerman, R., Goldsmith, M.: Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper. J. Exper. Psych. Applied 17(1), 18–32 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ji, S.W., Michaels, S., Waterman, D.: Print vs. electronic readings in college courses: cost-efficiency and perceived learning. Internet High. Educ. 21, 17–24 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mizrachi, D.: Undergraduates’ academic information and library behaviors: preliminary results. Ref. Serv. Rev. 38(4), 571–580 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mizrachi, D.: Online or print: which do students prefer? In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R. (eds.) ECIL 2014. CCIS, vol. 492, pp. 733–742. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mizrachi, D.: Undergraduates’ academic reading format preferences and behaviors. J. Acad. Librarianship 41(3), 301–311 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thayer, D., Lee, C.P., Hwang, L.H., Sales, H., Sen,P., Dalal, N.: The Imposition and Superimposition of Digital Reading Technology: The Academic Potential of E-readers. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2917–2926. Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979375

  10. Noyes, J.M., Garland, K.J.: VDT versus paper-based text: reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 31(6), 411–423 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zambarbieri, D., Carniglia, E.: Eye movement analysis of reading from computer displays, ereaders and printed books. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 32(5), 390–396 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strouse, R.: The changing face of content users and the impact on information providers. Online 28(5), 27–31 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eshet-Alkalai, Y., Geri, N.: Does the medium affect the message? the influence of text representation format on critical thinking. Hum. Syst. Manage. 26(4), 269–279 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, C., Poe, F., Potter, M., Quigley, B., Wilson, J.: UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey (2011). http://www.cdlib.org/services/uxdesign/docs/2011/academic_ebook_usage_survey.pdf

  15. Dilevko, J., Gottlieb, L.: Print sources in an electronic age: a vital part of the research process for undergraduate students. J. Acad. Librarianship 28(6), 381–392 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Case, D.O.: Principle of least effort. In: Fisher, K.E., Erdelez, S., McKechnie, L. (eds.) Theories of Information Behavior, pp. 289–297. Information Today Inc, Medford, NJ (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liew, C.L., Foo, S., Chennupati, K.R.: a study of graduate student end-users; use and perception of electronic journals. Online Inf. Rev. 24(4), 302–315 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sathe, N.A., Grady, J.L., Giuse, N.B.: Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 90(2), 235–243 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Corlett-Rivera, K., Hackman, T.: E-Book usage and attitudes in the humanities, social sciences, and education. Portal Libr. Acad. 14(2), 255–286 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foasberg, N.: Student reading practices in print and electronic media. Coll. Res. Libr. 75(5), 705–723 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, Z.: Print vs. electronic resources: a study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Inf. Process. Manage. 42(2), 583–592 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tenopir, C.: Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies (2003). http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf

  23. Mizrachi, D., Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates’ personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 64(8), 1590–1607 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quayyum, M.A.: Capturing the online academic reading process. Inf. Process. Manage. 44(2), 581–595 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of LIS&BS, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Vlasta Zabukovec & Polona Vilar

Authors
  1. Vlasta Zabukovec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Polona Vilar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Polona Vilar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Information Management, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara, Türkiye

    Serap Kurbanoglu

  2. DICEN IDF EA 7369, Université Paris Descartes DICEN IDF EA 7369, Paris, France

    Joumana Boustany

  3. University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    Sonja Špiranec

  4. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Esther Grassian

  5. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Diane Mizrachi

  6. School of Information, The University of Texas School of Information, Austin, TX, USA

    Loriene Roy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zabukovec, V., Vilar, P. (2015). Paper or Electronic: Preferences of Slovenian Students. In: Kurbanoglu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds) Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability. ECIL 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 552. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28196-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28197-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation