Commitments, Expectations, Affordances and Susceptibilities: Towards Positional Agent Programming | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Commitments, Expectations, Affordances and Susceptibilities: Towards Positional Agent Programming

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9387))

Abstract

The paper introduces an agent architecture centered around the notions of commitment, expectation, affordance, and susceptibility. These components are to a certain measure at the base of any agent system, however, inspired by research in explanation-based decision making, this contribution attempts to make explicit and start organizing under the same operationalization neglected figures as negative commitment, negative expectation, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sileno, G., Boer, A., van Engers, T.: On the interactional meaning of fundamental legal concepts. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2014, pp. 39–48 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hohfeld, W.N.: Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. The Yale Law Journal 26(8), 710–770 (1917)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boer, A., van Engers, T.: An agent-based legal knowledge acquisition methodology for agile public administration. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL 2011, pp. 171–180 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lehmann, J., Breuker, J.A., Brouwer, P.W.: Causation in AI & Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12(4), 279–315 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pennington, N., Hastie, R.: Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition 49, 123–163 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Wooldridge, M.: Programming multi-agent systems in AgentSpeak using Jason. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rao, A.S.: AgentSpeak (L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Proc. Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dastani, M.: 2APL: a practical agent programming language. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16(3), 214–248 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hindriks, K.V.: Programming rational agents in GOAL. In: Multi-agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications, pp. 119–157 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalski, R., Sadri, F.: From Logic Programming towards Multi-agent systems. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25, 391–419 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Costantini, S., Tocchio, A.: DALI: An Architecture for Intelligent Logical Agents. In: Proc. Workshop on Architectures for Intelligent Theory-Based Agents (AITA) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blanché, R.: Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria 19(3), 89–130 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Béziau, J.Y.: The Power of the Hexagon. Logica Universalis 6(1–2), 1–43 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bobbio, A.: System modelling with Petri nets. In: Systems Reliability Assessment, pp. 102–143 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hindriks, K.V., van Riemsdijk, M.B.: Satisfying maintenance goals. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4897, pp. 86–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Norm compliance in business process modeling. In: Dean, M., Hall, J., Rotolo, A., Tabet, S. (eds.) RuleML 2010. LNCS, vol. 6403, pp. 194–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson, J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ogilvie, D.M., Rose, K.M.: Self-with-other representations and a taxonomy of motives: two approaches to studying persons. Journal of Personality 63(3), 643–679 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meneguzzi, F., Telang, P., Singh, M.: A first-order formalization of commitments and goals for planning. In: Proc. 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 697–703 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kowalski, R., Sadri, F.: Integrating logic programming and production systems in abductive logic programming agents. In: Polleres, A., Swift, T. (eds.) RR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5837, pp. 1–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Behrens, T., Dix, J.: Model checking with logic based petri nets. In: Proc. of CLIMA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Celaya, J.R., Desrochers, A.A., Graves, R.J.: Modeling and analysis of multi-agent systems using petri nets. Journal of Computers 4(10), 981–996 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Purvis, M., Cranefield, S.: Agent modelling with petri nets. In: Proc. Computational Engineering in Systems Applications - CESA 1996, pp. 602–607 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz Center for Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer & Tom van Engers

Authors
  1. Giovanni Sileno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Boer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tom van Engers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Sileno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Qingliang Chen

  2. Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Paolo Torroni

  3. Inria - Sophia Antipolis-Méditerran, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Serena Villata

  4. National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Jane Hsu

  5. Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Andrea Omicini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sileno, G., Boer, A., van Engers, T. (2015). Commitments, Expectations, Affordances and Susceptibilities: Towards Positional Agent Programming. In: Chen, Q., Torroni, P., Villata, S., Hsu, J., Omicini, A. (eds) PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25523-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25524-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation