Abstract
Social robots may provide a solution to various societal challenges (e.g. the aging society, unhealthy lifestyles, sustainability). In the current contribution, we argue that crucial in the interactions of social robots with humans is that social robots are always created to some extent to influence the human: Persuasive robots might (very powerfully) persuade human agents to behave in specific ways, by giving information, providing feedback and taking over actions, serving social values (e.g. sustainability) or goals of the user (e.g. therapy adherence), but they might also serve goals of their owners (e.g. selling products). The success of persuasive robots depends on the integration of sound technology, effective persuasive principles and careful attention to ethical considerations. The current chapter brings together psychological and ethical expertise to investigate how persuasive robots can influence human behaviour and thinking in a way that is (1) morally acceptable (focusing on user autonomy, using deontological theories as a starting point for ethical evaluation) and (2) psychologically effective (focusing on effectiveness of persuasive strategies). These insights will be combined in a case study analysing the moral acceptability of persuasive strategies that a persuasive robot might employ while serving as a clothing store clerk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco (2003)
IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C.J.H., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E.: Persuasive technology for human well-being: setting the scene. In: IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C.J.H., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) Persuasive Technology, vol. 3962, pp. 1–5. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2006)
Midden, C., Ham, J.: Persuasive technology to promote environmental behavior. In: Steg, L., van den Berg, A.E., de Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology: An Introduction. Wiley–Blackwell (2012)
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
Fogg, B.J., Nass, C.I.: Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46, 551–561 (1997)
Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.I.: Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. IROS 2009, 2563–2568 (2009)
Ham, J., Midden, C.: A persuasive robot to stimulate energy conservation: the influence of positive and negative social feedback and task similarity on energy consumption behavior. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6(2), 163–171 (2013)
Ham, J., Bokhorst, R., Cuijpers, R., Van der Pol, D., Cabibihan, J.-J.: Making robots persuasive: the influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Robotics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24–25 November 2011
Brehm, J.W.: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic, New York (1966)
Roubroeks, M., Ham, J., Midden, C.: The dominant robot: threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals. In: Conference Proceedings of Persuasive 2010, pp. 174–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Smids, J.: The voluntariness of persuasive technology. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7284, pp. 123–132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)
Spahn, A.: And lead us (not) into persuasion? Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18(4), 633–650 (2012)
Thaler, R., Sunstein, C.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven (2008)
Hausman, D.M., Welch, B.: Debate: to nudge or not to nudge. J. Polit. Philos. 18(1), 123–136 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x
Smids, J.: The ethics of using similarity cues in persuasion. Unpublished manuscript (2014)
Nickel, P., Spahn, A.: Trust, discourse ethics, and persuasive technology. In: Conference Proceedings of Persuasive, p. 37 (2012)
Karppinen, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Three approaches to ethical considerations in the design of behavior change support systems. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) Persuasive Technology, vol. 7822, pp. 87–98. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013)
Spahn, A.: ‘Moralische Maschinen?’ ‘Persuasive Technik’ als Herausforderung für rationalistische Ethiken. In: XXII. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie, 11–15 September 2011, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Münche 2011. http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12596/ (2011)
Yetim, F.: Bringing discourse ethics to value sensitive design: pathways toward a deliberative future. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3(2), 133–155 (2011)
Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Collins, New York (2009)
Cialdini, R.B., Trost, M.R.: Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance. In: Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, 4th edn, pp. 151–192. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., Kallgren, C.A.: A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 1015–1026 (1990)
Moscovici, S.: Social influence and conformity. In: Lindzey, G., Aronson, E. (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 347–412. Random House, New York (1985)
Milgram, S.: Obedience to Authority; An Experimental View. Harper and Row, New York (1974)
Midden, C., Ham, J.: Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy. In: Conference Proceedings of Persuasive 2009, Claremont, USA, pp. article no. 12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Baumeister, R.F., Bratlavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., Vohs, K.D.: Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5, 323–370 (2001)
Nettel, A.L., Roque, G.: Persuasive argumentation versus manipulation. Argumentation 26(1), 55–69 (2012)
Brynjarsdottir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P.: Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12), pp. 947–956. ACM, New York (2012)
Spahn, A.: Moralizing mobility? Persuasive technologies and the ethics of mobility. Transfers 3(2), 108–115 (2013)
Timmer, J., Smids, J., Kool, L., Spahn, A., van Est, R.: Op advies van de auto. Persuasieve technologie en de toekomst van het verkeerssysteem. Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag (2013)
Riva, G., Vatalaro, F., Davide, F., Alcañiz, M.: Ambient Intelligence: The Evolution of Technology, Communication and Cognition Towards the Future of Human–Computer Interaction. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)
Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L., Selker, T.: Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In: Conference Proceedings of CHI 2005, pp. 631–639. ACM Press, Reading (2005)
Ham, J., Midden, C., Beute, F.: Can ambient persuasive technology persuade unconsciously? Using subliminal feedback to influence energy consumption ratings of household appliances. In: Conference Proceedings of Persuasive 2009, Claremont, USA, pp. article no. 29. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Ham, J., van Esch, M., Limpens, Y., de Pee, J., Cabibihan, J.-J., Ge, S.S.: The automaticity of social behavior towards robots: the influence of cognitive load on interpersonal distance to approachable versus less approachable robots. In: Ge, S.S., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2012, LNAI 7621, pp. 15–25 (2012)
Baker, S., Martinson, D.L.: The TARES test: five principles for ethical persuasion. J. Mass Media Ethics 16(2 & 3), 148–175 (2001)
Bracken, C.C., Jeffres, L.W., Neuendorf, K.A.: Criticism or praise: the impact of verbal versus text-only computer feedback on social presence, intrinsic motivation, and recall. CyberPsychol. Behav. 7, 349–357 (2004)
Midden, C., Ham, J.: The illusion of agency: the influence of the agency of an artificial agent on its persuasive power. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) Persuasive 2012: Design for Health and Safety. The 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 6–8 June 2012, Linkoping, Sweden (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7284, pp. 90–99). Springer, Berlin (2012)
Vossen, S., Ham, J., Midden, C.: What makes social feedback from a robot work? Disentangling the effect of speech, physical appearance and evaluation. In: Conference Proceedings of Persuasive 2010, pp. 52–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Acknowledgements
We want to thank Prof. Dr. Cees Midden and the persuasive technology group at Human–Technology Interaction and Ethics at the Eindhoven University of Technology for crucial input for this chapter. This research was in part made possible by funding from the NWO MVI project ‘Wise choices and Smart Changes: The moral and psychological effectiveness of persuasive technologies’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ham, J., Spahn, A. (2015). Shall I Show You Some Other Shirts Too? The Psychology and Ethics of Persuasive Robots. In: Trappl, R. (eds) A Construction Manual for Robots' Ethical Systems. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21548-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21548-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21547-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21548-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)