Abstract
Social assistive robots are envisioned as supporting their users not only physically but also by communicating with them. Monitoring medication, reminders, etc., are typical examples of such tasks. This kind of assistance presupposes that such a robot is able to interact socially with a human. The issue that is discussed in this chapter is whether human–robot social interaction raises ethical questions that have to be dealt with by the robot. A tour d’horizon of possibly related fields of communication ethics allows to outline the distinctive features and requirements of such an “interaction ethics”. Case studies on conversational phenomena show examples of ethical problems on the levels of the “mechanics” of conversation, meaning-making, and relationship. Finally, the chapter outlines the possible connections between decision ethics and interaction ethics in a robot’s behaviour control system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
ISO 13482:2014 Robots and robotic devices—Safety requirements for personal care robots. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=53820.
- 2.
This double game appears less astonishing when one considers how children play with their dolls and stuffed animals: one minute they are cuddled and “alive”, the next minute a neglected object, with an apparently effortless switch between the two modes.
- 3.
Institute of Communication Ethics, http://www.communicationethics.net/home/index.php.
- 4.
References
Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Chicago (2005)
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42(3–4), 143–166 (2003)
Rummel, R.J.: Understanding Conflict and War, vol. 2. Sage, Beverly Hills (1976)
Searle, J.R.: Minds, brains and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3(3), 417–457 (1980)
Nass, C., Brave, S.: Wired for Speech. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Payr, S.: Virtual butlers and real people: styles and practices in long-term use of a companion. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Virtual Butlers: The Making of. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Case-supported principle-based behavior paradigm. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) A Construction Manual for Robots’ Ethical Systems: Requirements, Methods, Implementations. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Robot Be Good. Scientific American, October 2010
Barnlund, D.C.: A transactional model of communication. Transaction. In: Mortensen, C.D. (ed.) Communication Theory, pp. 47–57. Transaction, New Brunswick (2008)
NCA, Legislative Council: NCA Credo for Ethical Communication. Edited by National Communication Association. https://www.natcom.org/Tertiary.aspx?id=2119 (1999)
Andersen, K.E.: A conversation about communication ethics with Kenneth E. Andersen. In: Arneson, P. (ed.) Exploring Communication Ethics: Interviews with Influential Scholars in the Field, pp. 131–142. Peter Lang, New York (2007)
Wrench, J.S., Punyanunt-Carter, N.: An Introduction to Organizational Communication. http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/an-introduction-to-organizational-communication/ (2012)
McCroskey, J.C., Wrench, J.S., Richmond, V.P.: Principles of Public Speaking. The College Network, Indianapolis (2003)
Redding, W.C.: Ethics and the study of organizational communication: when will we wake up? In: Jaksa, J.A., Pritchard, M.S. (eds.) Responsible Communication: Ethical Issues in Business, Industry, and the Professions, pp. 17–40. Hampton, Cresskill (1996)
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J.B., Jackson, D.D.: Pragmatics of Human Communication. W. W. Norton & Company, New York (1967)
Arnett, R.C., Harden Fritz, J.M., Bell, L.M.: Communication Ethics Literacy: Dialogue and Difference. Sage, London (2009)
Fearon, D.S.: The bond threat sequence: discourse evidence for the systematic interdependence of shame and social relationships. In: Tiedens, L.Z., Leach, C.W. (eds.) The Social Life of Emotions, pp. 64–86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Scheff, T.: Microsociology. Discourse, Emotion, and Social Structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)
Kemper, T.D.: Social relations and emotions: a structural approach. In: Kemper, T.D. (ed.) Research Agendas in the Sociology of Emotions, pp. 207–236. State University of New York Press, New York (1990)
Leary, M.R.: Affect, cognition, and the social emotions. In: Forgas, J.P. (ed.) Feeling and Thinking, pp. 331–356. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Sander-Staudt, M.: Care Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/care-eth/ (last visited May 2, 2014)
Dubreuil, B., Grégoire, J.-F.: Are moral norms distinct from social norms? A critical assessment of Jon Elster and Cristina Bicchieri. Theory Decis. 75(1), 137–152 (2013)
Huebner, B., Lee, J.L., Hauser, M.D.: The moral-conventional distinction in mature moral competence. J. Cogn. Cult. 10, 1–26 (2010)
Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge (1967)
ten Have, P.: Doing Conversation Analysis. Sage, London (1999)
ten Have, P.: Conversation analysis versus other approaches to discourse. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 7(2) (2006)
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), 696–735 (1974)
Eggins, S., Slade, D.: Analysing Casual Conversation. Equinox, London (1997)
Jefferson, G.: Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Hum. Stud. 9(2/3), 153–183 (1986)
Hutchby, I.: Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. J. Politeness Res. 4, 221–241 (2008)
Maynard, D.W.: Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica 30(3/4), 263–290 (1980)
Okamoto, D.G., Smith-Lovin, L.: Changing the subject: gender, status, and the dynamics of topic change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66(6), 852–873 (2001)
Schegloff, E.A.: On the organization of sequences as a source of “Coherence” in talk-in-interaction. In: Dorval, B. (ed.) Conversational Organization and its Development, pp. 51–77. Ablex, Norwood (1990)
Creer, S., Cunningham, S., Hawley, M., Wallis, P.: Describing the interactive domestic robot setup for the SERA project. Appl. Artif. Intell. 25(6), 445–473 (2011)
Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Howe, M.: Collaboration on topic change in conversation. In: Ichihashi, K., Linn, M.S. (eds.) Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 1–14. University of Kansas (1991)
Beach, W.A.: Conversation analysis: “Okay” as a clue for understanding consequentiality. In: Sigman, S.J. (ed.) The Consequentiality of Communication, pp. 121–162. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, Hillsdale (1995)
Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)
Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics. Academic, New York (1975)
Finch, G.: Linguistic Terms and Concepts. Macmillan, London (2000)
Bernsen, N.O., Dybkjer, H., Dybkjer, L.: Cooperativity in human–machine and human–human spoken dialogue. Discourse Process. 21, 213–236 (1996)
Davies, B.: Grice’s Cooperative Principle: getting the meaning across. In: Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, vol. 8, pp. 361–378 (2000)
Grandy, R.E.: On Grice on language. J. Philos. 86, 514–525 (1989)
Grice, H.P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Wallis, P.: Revisiting the DARPA communicator data using conversation analysis. Interact. Stud. 9(3), 434–457 (2008)
Seedhouse, P.: The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom. A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)
Drew, P.: Contested evidence in court-room cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In: Drew, P., Heritage, J. (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 470–520. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Hutchby, I., Wooffitt, R.: Conversation Analysis, 2nd edn. Polity Press, Cambridge (2008)
Fairclough, N.: Language and Power, 2nd edn. Longman, Harlow (2001)
Goffman, E.: Interaction Rituals: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. Pantheon, New York (1967)
Malone, M.J.: Worlds of Talk. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation. Polity Press, Cambridge (1997)
Culpepper, J.: Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Burke, P.J., Stets, J.E.: Identity Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
Dennett, D.C.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)
Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York (1959)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Payr, S. (2015). Towards Human–Robot Interaction Ethics. In: Trappl, R. (eds) A Construction Manual for Robots' Ethical Systems. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21548-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21548-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21547-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21548-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)