Determining Team Hierarchy from Broadcast Communications | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Determining Team Hierarchy from Broadcast Communications

  • Chapter
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8851))

Included in the following conference series:

  • International Conference on Social Informatics

Abstract

Broadcast chat messages among team members in an organization can be used to evaluate team coordination and performance. Intuitively, a well-coordinated team should reflect the team hierarchy, which would indicate that team members assigned with particular roles are performing their jobs effectively. Existing approaches to identify hierarchy are limited to data from where graphs can be extracted easily. We contribute a novel approach that takes as input broadcast messages, extracts communication patterns—as well as semantic, communication, and social features—and outputs an organizational hierarchy. We evaluate our approach using a dataset of broadcast chat communications from a large-scale Army exercise for which ground truth is available. We further validate our approach on the Enron corpus of corporate email.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austin, J.L.: How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks 28(4), 466–484 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1), 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eaton, J.W.: Social processes of professional teamwork. American Sociological Review 16(5), 707–713 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fiore, A., Heer, J.: UC Berkeley Enron email analysis (2004), http://bailando.sims.berkeley.edu/enron_email.html

  6. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3), 215–239 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert, E.: Phrases that signal workplace hierarchy. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1037–1046 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupte, M., Shankar, P., Li, J., Muthukrishnan, S., Iftode, L.: Finding hierarchy in directed online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 557–566 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klein, D., Manning, C.D.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, pp. 423–430 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klimt, B., Yang, Y.: The enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) ECML 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3201, pp. 217–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Krafft, P., Moore, J., Desmarais, B.A., Wallach, H.M.: Topic-partitioned multinetwork embeddings. In: Proceedings of 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2012, pp. 2807–2815. Curran Associates, Inc., Lake Tahoe (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lehner, P.: Testing the accuracy of automated classification systems using only expert ratings that are less accurate than the system. In: The MITRE Corporation, pp. 1–28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leonard, M.W., Frankel, A.S.: Role of effective teamwork and communication in delivering safe, high-quality care. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 78(6), 820–826 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mones, E.: Hierarchy in directed random networks. Physical Review E 87(2), 022817 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mones, E., Vicsek, L., Vicsek, T.: Hierarchy measure for complex networks. PLoS ONE 7(3), e33799 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishihara, Y., Sunayama, W.: Estimation of friendship and hierarchy from conversation records. Information Sciences 179(11), 1592–1598 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Resick, C.J., Murase, T., Randall, K.R., DeChurch, L.A.: Information elaboration and team performance: Examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 124(2), 165–176 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rowe, R., Creamer, G., Hershkop, S., Stolfo, S.J.: Automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, San Jose, pp. 109–117 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sibson, R.: SLINK: An optimally efficient algorithm for the single-link cluster method. The Computer Journal 16(1), 30–34 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Jean, Y., Wu, J.C., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y., Potts, C.: Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Y., Iliofotou, M., Faloutsos, M., Wu, B.: Analyzing communication interaction networks (cins) in enterprises and inferring hierarchies. Computer Networks 57(10), 2147–2158 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalia, A.K., Buchler, N., Ungvarsky, D., Govindan, R., Singh, M.P. (2014). Determining Team Hierarchy from Broadcast Communications. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8851. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13733-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13734-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics