A Proposed Evaluation Framework from Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning Activities in Science Education | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Proposed Evaluation Framework from Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning Activities in Science Education

  • Conference paper
Mobile as a Mainstream – Towards Future Challenges in Mobile Learning (mLearn 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 479))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the advancement in the use of mobile technology has attracted many educators and researchers to develop mobile science inquiry-based learning activities for educational purposes. In school science education literature, many applications are designed and evaluated using various evaluating frameworks. These evaluations are based on either one or more of the following attributes; technological usability, inquiry skills, learners’ performance, learners’ perceptions about the applications, learners’ cognitive load and the longer impact of an application. However, none of these frameworks cover all of these attributes in a single framework. Thus, this paper addresses this issue by conducting a comprehensive literature review about the current state of the use of mobile science inquiry evaluation frameworks. Consequently, a proposed framework, MSI (Mobile Science Inquiry) evaluating framework is presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lim, B.-R.: Challenges and Issues in Designing Inquiry on the Web. British J. of Educ. Tech. 35(5), 627–643 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shih, J.-L., Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Kinshuk: An Investigation of Attitudes of Students and Teachers About Participating in a Context-aware Ubiquitous Learning Activity. British J. of Edu. Tech. 42(3), 373–394 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edelson, D.C., Gordin, D.N., Pea, R.D.: Addressing the Challenge of Inquiry-based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design. J. of the Learn. Sci. 8(3-4), 391–450 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, M.-F., Fulford, C.P., Ho, C.P., Iyoda, R., Ackerman, L.K.: Possibilities and Challenges in Mobile Learning for K-12 Teachers: A Pilot Retrospetive Survey Study. In: 7th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE 2012), pp. 132–136 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers, Y., Price, S., Randell, C., Fraser, D.S., Weal, M., Fitzpatrick, G.: Ubi-learning Integrates Indoor and Outdoor Experiences. Comm. of the ACM 48(1), 55–59 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, Y.-M., Lin, Y.-T., Cheng, S.-C.: Effectiveness of a Mobile Plant Learning System in a Science Curriculum in Taiwanese Elementary Education. Comp. & Edu. 54, 47–58 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulder, Y.G., Lazonder, A.W., De Jong, T.: Comparing Two Types of Model Progression in an Inquiry Learning Enviornment with Modelling Facilities. Learn. and Instr. 21(5), 614–624 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peker, D., Wallace, C.S.: Characterizing High School Students’ Written Explanations in Biology Laboratories. Res. in Sci. Edu. 41(2), 169–191 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., Lonsdale, P.: Myartspace: Design and Evaluation of Support for Learning with Multimedia Phones Between Classrooms and Museums. Comp. & Edu. 53, 286–299 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed, S., Parsons, D.: Evaluating ‘ThinknLearn’: A Mobile Science Enquiry Based Larning Application in Practice. In: 11th International Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (MLearn 2012), pp. 17–24 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed, S., Parsons, D.: Abductive Science Inquiry Using Mobile Devices in the Classroom. Comp. & Educ. 63, 62–72 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Motiwalla, L.F.: Mobile learning: A Framework and Evaluation. Comp. & Educ. 49, 581–596 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Theng, Y.-L., Tan, K.-L., Lim, E.-P., Zhang, J., Goh, D.H., Chatterjea, K.,... Vo, M.C.: Mobile G-Portal Supporting Collaborative Sharing and Learning in Geography Fieldwork: An Empirical Study. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 462–471. ACM, Vancouver (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.R.: User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Mangmt. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dishaw, T.D., Strong, D.M.: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model With Task-Technology Fit Constructs. Info. & Mangmt. 36, 9–21 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McNeil, K.L., Krajcik, J.: Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science: The Claim, Evidence and Reasoning Framework for Talk and Writing. Pearson & Allyn & Bacon, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A., Landes, N.: The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness and Applications. BSCS, Colardo Springs (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhn, A.C.: Zydeco: Exploring How Mobile Technology Can Scaffold Student Multimedia Data Collection and Use of Science Inquiry. PhD Thesis. University of Michigan, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, T.-C., Peng, H., Wu, W.H., Lin, M.-S.: The Effects of Mobile Natural-science Learning Based on the 5E Learning Cycle: A Case Study. Educ. Tech. & Soc. 12(4), 344–358 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang, G.-J., Chang, H.-F.: A Formative Assessment-Based Mobile Learning Approach to Improving the Learning Attitudes and Achievements of Students. Comp. & Educ. 56, 1023–1031 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu, H., Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., Tseng, J.C.: A Two-Tier Test Approach to Developing Location-aware Mobile Learning Systems for Natural Science Courses. Comp. & Educ. 55, 1618–1627 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parr, C.S., Jones, T., Songer, N.B.: Evaluation of a Handheld Data Collection Interface for Science Learning. J. of Sci. Edu. and Tech., 233–242 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maldonado, H., Pea, R.D.: LET’S GO! To The Creek: Co-Design of Water Quality Inquiry Using Mobile Science Collaboraties. In: 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE 2010), pp. 81–87 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mulholland, P., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T., Feisst, M., Gaved, M., Kerawalla, L., Wright, M.: nQuire: Technological Support for Personal Inquiry Learning. IEEE Trans. on Learn. Tech. 5(2), 157–169 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, J.C., Lin, Y.L.: Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Mobile Learning Environment With Shared Display Groupware. Educ. Tech. & Soc. 13(1), 195–207 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., Pennel, W.R.: Using Handheld Computers to Support Improved Classroom Assessment in Science: Result From a Field Trial. J. of Sci. Edu. and Tech. 15(2), 142–158 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong, S.K(B.), Nguyen, T.T., Chang, E., Jayaratna, N.: Usability Metrics for E-learning. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM Workshops 2003. LNCS, vol. 2889, pp. 235–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parsons, D., Ryu, H.: A Framework for Assessing the Quality of Mobile Learning. In: 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE Computer Society, Kerkrade (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chua, B.B., Dyson, L.E.: Applying the ISO 9126 Model to the Evaluation of an E-Learning System. In: Atkinson, R., McBeath, C., Jonas-Dwyer, D., Phillips, R. (eds.) Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, pp. 184–190 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J.J., Paas, F.G.: Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educ. Psy. Rev. 10(3), 251–297 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Jong, T.: Computer Simulations - Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning. Science 312(5773), 532–533 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ahmed, S. (2014). A Proposed Evaluation Framework from Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning Activities in Science Education. In: Kalz, M., Bayyurt, Y., Specht, M. (eds) Mobile as a Mainstream – Towards Future Challenges in Mobile Learning. mLearn 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 479. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13416-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13416-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13415-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13416-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics