Predicate Abstraction for Program Verification | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Predicate Abstraction for Program Verification

Safety and Termination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Model Checking

  • 11k Accesses

Abstract

We present basic principles of algorithms for the verification of safety and termination of programs. The algorithms call procedures on logical formulas in order to construct an abstraction and to refine an abstraction. The two underlying concepts are predicate abstraction and counterexample-guided abstraction refinement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albarghouthi, A., Li, Y., Gurfinkel, A., Chechik, M.: UFO: a framework for abstraction- and interpolation-based software verification. In: Madhusudan, P., Seshia, S.A. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 7358, pp. 672–678. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ball, T., Majumdar, R., Millstein, T.D., Rajamani, S.K.: Automatic predicate abstraction of C programs. In: Burke, M., Soffa, M.L. (eds.) Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pp. 203–213. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ball, T., Podelski, A., Rajamani, S.K.: Boolean and Cartesian abstraction for model checking C programs. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 5(1), 49–58 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ball, T., Rajamani, S.K.: Bebop: a symbolic model checker for boolean programs. In: Havelund, K., Penix, J., Visser, W. (eds.) Intl. Workshop on Model Checking Software (SPIN). LNCS, vol. 1885, pp. 113–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ball, T., Rajamani, S.K.: The SLAM project: debugging system software via static analysis. In: Launchbury, J., Mitchell, J.C. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 1–3. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beyene, T.A., Chaudhuri, S., Popeea, C., Rybalchenko, A.: A constraint-based approach to solving games on infinite graphs. In: Jagannathan, S., Sewell, P. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 221–234. ACM, New York (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyene, T.A., Popeea, C., Rybalchenko, A.: Solving existentially quantified Horn clauses. In: Sharygina, N., Veith, H. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 8044, pp. 869–882. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Beyer, D., Cimatti, A., Griggio, A., Keremoglu, M.E., Sebastiani, R.: Software model checking via large-block encoding. In: Formal Methods in Computer Aided Design (FMCAD), pp. 25–32. IEEE, Piscataway (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beyer, D., Gulwani, S., Schmidt, D.A.: Combining model checking and data-flow analysis. In: Clarke, E.M., Henzinger, T.A., Veith, H., Bloem, R. (eds.) Handbook of Model Checking. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beyer, D., Keremoglu, M.E.: CPAchecker: a tool for configurable software verification. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 184–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Beyer, D., Keremoglu, M.E., Wendler, P.: Predicate abstraction with adjustable-block encoding. In: Bloem, R., Sharygina, N. (eds.) Formal Methods in Computer Aided Design (FMCAD), pp. 189–197. IEEE, Piscataway (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bjørner, N., McMillan, K.L., Rybalchenko, A.: On solving universally quantified Horn clauses. In: Logozzo, F., Fähndrich, M. (eds.) Intl. Symp. on Static Analysis (SAS). LNCS, vol. 7935, pp. 105–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Brockschmidt, M., Cook, B., Fuhs, C.: Better termination proving through cooperation. In: Sharygina, N., Veith, H. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 8044, pp. 413–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Brockschmidt, M., Musiol, R., Otto, C., Giesl, J.: Automated termination proofs for Java programs with cyclic data. In: Madhusudan, P., Seshia, S.A. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 7358, pp. 105–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Chaki, S., Clarke, E.M., Groce, A., Jha, S., Veith, H.: Modular verification of software components in C. In: Clarke, L.A., Dillon, L., Tichy, W.F. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 385–395. IEEE, Piscataway (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chamarthi, H.R., Dillinger, P.C., Manolios, P., Vroon, D.: The ACL2 Sedan theorem proving system. In: Abdulla, P.A., Leino, K.R.M. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS). LNCS, vol. 6605, pp. 291–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement. In: Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 1855, pp. 154–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke, E.M., Kroening, D., Sharygina, N., Yorav, K.: SATABS: SAT-based predicate abstraction for ANSI-C. In: Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS). LNCS, vol. 3440, pp. 570–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke, E.M., Kurshan, R.P., Veith, H.: The localization reduction and counterexample-guided abstraction refinement. In: Manna, Z., Peled, D.A. (eds.) Essays in Memory of Amir Pnueli. LNCS, vol. 6200, pp. 61–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cook, B., Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: Termination proofs for systems code. In: Schwartzbach, M.I., Ball, T. (eds.) Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pp. 415–426. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cook, B., Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: Terminator: beyond safety. In: Ball, T., Jones, R.B. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 4144, pp. 415–418. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Cook, B., See, A., Zuleger, F.: Ramsey vs. lexicographic termination proving. In: Piterman, N., Smolka, S.A. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS). LNCS, vol. 7795, pp. 47–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: Graham, R.M., Harrison, M.A., Sethi, R. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 238–252. ACM, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: An abstract interpretation framework for termination. In: Field, J., Hicks, M. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 245–258. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Craig, W.: Linear reasoning. A new form of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem. J. Symb. Log. 22(3), 250–268 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Dams, D., Grumberg, O.: Abstraction and abstraction refinement. In: Clarke, E.M., Henzinger, T.A., Veith, H., Bloem, R. (eds.) Handbook of Model Checking. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Das, S., Dill, D.L., Park, S.: Experience with predicate abstraction. In: Halbwachs, N., Peled, D.A. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 1633, pp. 160–171. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Dräger, K., Kupriyanov, A., Finkbeiner, B., Wehrheim, H.: SLAB: a certifying model checker for infinite-state concurrent systems. In: Esparza, J., Majumdar, R. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS). LNCS, vol. 6015, pp. 271–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Flanagan, C., Leino, K.R.M.: Houdini, an annotation assistant for ESC/Java. In: Oliveira, J.N., Zave, P. (eds.) Intl. Symp. on Formal Methods Europe (FME). LNCS, vol. 2021, pp. 500–517. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Floyd, R.W.: Assigning meanings to programs. In: Schwartz, J.T. (ed.) Mathematical Aspects of Computer Science, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, pp. 19–32. AMS, Providence (1967)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Graf, S., Saïdi, H.: Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Grebenshchikov, S., Lopes, N.P., Popeea, C., Rybalchenko, A.: Synthesizing software verifiers from proof rules. In: Vitek, J., Lin, H., Tip, F. (eds.) Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pp. 405–416. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gulavani, B.S., Henzinger, T.A., Kannan, Y., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K.: SYNERGY: a new algorithm for property checking. In: Young, M., Devanbu, P.T. (eds.) Intl. Symp. on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE), pp. 117–127. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gupta, A., Popeea, C., Rybalchenko, A.: Predicate abstraction and refinement for verifying multi-threaded programs. In: Ball, T., Sagiv, M. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 331–344. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gupta, A., Popeea, C., Rybalchenko, A.: Threader: a constraint-based verifier for multi-threaded programs. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 412–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Heizmann, M., Hoenicke, J., Podelski, A.: Nested interpolants. In: Hermenegildo, M.V., Palsberg, J. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 471–482. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Heizmann, M., Jones, N.D., Podelski, A.: Size-change termination and transition invariants. In: Cousot, R., Martel, M. (eds.) Intl. Symp. on Static Analysis (SAS). LNCS, vol. 6337, pp. 22–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Henzinger, T.A., Jhala, R., Majumdar, R., McMillan, K.L.: Abstractions from proofs. In: Jones, N.D., Leroy, X. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 232–244. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Henzinger, T.A., Jhala, R., Majumdar, R., Sutre, G.: Lazy abstraction. In: Launchbury, J., Mitchell, J.C. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 58–70. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hoare, C.A.R.: An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Commun. ACM 12(10), 576–580 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ivancic, F., Shlyakhter, I., Gupta, A., Ganai, M.K.: Model checking C programs using F-SOFT. In: International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), pp. 297–308. IEEE, Piscataway (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jhala, R., Majumdar, R.: Software model checking. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(4), 21:1–21:54 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jhala, R., McMillan, K.L.: Array abstractions from proofs. In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 193–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Kroening, D., Sharygina, N., Tsitovich, A., Wintersteiger, C.M.: Termination analysis with compositional transition invariants. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 89–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Kroening, D., Weissenbacher, G.: Interpolation-based software verification with Wolverine. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 573–578. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Lahiri, S.K., Bryant, R.E.: Indexed predicate discovery for unbounded system verification. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 135–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee, C.S., Jones, N.D., Ben-Amram, A.M.: The size-change principle for program termination. In: Hankin, C., Schmidt, D. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 81–92. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lee, W., Wang, B., Yi, K.: Termination analysis with algorithmic learning. In: Madhusudan, P., Seshia, S.A. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 7358, pp. 88–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. McMillan, K.L.: Lazy abstraction with interpolants. In: Ball, T., Jones, R.B. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). LNCS, vol. 4144, pp. 123–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K., Tetali, S., Thakur, A.V.: The Yogi project: software property checking via static analysis and testing. In: Kowalewski, S., Philippou, A. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS). LNCS, vol. 5505, pp. 178–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: A complete method for the synthesis of linear ranking functions. In: Steffen, B., Levi, G. (eds.) Intl. Conf. on Verification, Model Checking and Abstract Interpretation (VMCAI). LNCS, vol. 2937, pp. 239–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: Transition invariants. In: Symp. on Logic in Computer Science (LICS), pp. 32–41. IEEE, Piscataway (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.: Transition predicate abstraction and fair termination. In: Palsberg, J., Abadi, M. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 132–144. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A.A.: The logical choice for software model checking with abstraction refinement. In: Hanus, M. (ed.) Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages (PADL). LNCS, vol. 4354, pp. 245–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Podelski, A., Wies, T.: Boolean heaps. In: Hankin, C., Siveroni, I. (eds.) Intl. Symp. on Static Analysis (SAS). LNCS, vol. 3672, pp. 268–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Podelski, A., Wies, T.: Counterexample-guided focus. In: Hermenegildo, M.V., Palsberg, J. (eds.) Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 249–260. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rondon, P.M., Kawaguchi, M., Jhala, R.: Liquid types. In: Gupta, R., Amarasinghe, S.P. (eds.) Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pp. 159–169. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sagiv, S., Reps, T.W., Wilhelm, R.: Parametric shape analysis via 3-valued logic. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 24(3), 217–298 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA

    Ranjit Jhala

  2. University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Andreas Podelski

  3. Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK

    Andrey Rybalchenko

Authors
  1. Ranjit Jhala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Podelski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrey Rybalchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey Rybalchenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FORE Systems University Professor of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Edmund M. Clarke

  2. Institute of Science and Technology Austria (IST), Klosterneuburg, Austria

    Thomas A. Henzinger

  3. Arbeitsbereich Formal Methods in Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Helmut Veith

  4. Institut f. Angewandte Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikationstechnologie (IAIK), Technische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria

    Roderick Bloem

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jhala, R., Podelski, A., Rybalchenko, A. (2018). Predicate Abstraction for Program Verification. In: Clarke, E., Henzinger, T., Veith, H., Bloem, R. (eds) Handbook of Model Checking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10575-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10575-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10574-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10575-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation