Abstract
Variations in the performance of breast readers are well reported, but key lesion and reader parameters explaining such variations are not fully explored. This large study aims to: 1) measure diagnostic accuracy of breast radiologists, 2) identify parameters linked to higher levels of performance, and 3) establish the key morphological descriptors that impact detection of breast cancer. Methods: Sixty cases, 20 containing cancer, were shown to 129 radiologists. Each reader was asked to locate any malignancies and provide a confidence rating using a scale of 1-5. Details were obtained from each radiologist regarding experience and training and were correlated with jackknifing free response operating characteristic (JAFROC) figure of merit. Cancers were ranked according to the “detectability rating” that is, the number of readers who accurately detected and located the lesion divided by the total number of readers, and this was correlated with various mathematical lesion descriptors. Results: Higher reader performance was positively correlated with number of years reading mammograms (r=0.24, p=0.01), number of mammogram readings per year (r=0.28, p=0.001), and hours reading mammogram per week (r=0.19, p=0.04). For image features and lesion descriptors there was correlation between “detectability rating” and lesion size (r=0.65, p=0.005), breast density (r=-0.64, p=0.007), perimeter (r=0.66, p=0.0004), eccentricity (r= 0.49, p=0.02), and solidity (r=0.78, p< 0.0001). Radiologist experience and lesion morphology may contribute significantly to reduce cancer detection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferlay, J., Shin, H.-R., Bray, F., et al.: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of Cancer 127(12), 917–2893 (2010)
Beam, C.A., Layde, P.M., Sullivan, D.C.: Variability in the Interpretation of Screening Mammograms by US Radiologists: Findings From a National Sample. Arch. Intern. Med. 156(2), 13–209 (1996)
Patel, M.R., Whitman, G.J.: Negative mammograms in symptomatic patients with breast cancer. Acad. Radiol. 5, 26–33 (1998)
Goergen, S.K., Evans, J., Cohen, G.P., MacMillan, J.: Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology. 204(1), 5–131 (1997)
Berlin, L.: Defending the “missed” radiographic diagnosis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 317–322 (2001)
Huynh, P.T., Jarolimek, A.M., Daye, S.: The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics 18(5), 54–1137 (1998)
Yankaskas, B.C., Schell, M.J., Bird, R.E., Desrochers, D.A.: Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: A community-based study. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 177(3), 41–535 (2001)
Barlow, W.E., Chi, C., Carney, P.A., et al.: Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96(24), 1840–1850 (2004)
Smith-Bindman, R., Chu, P.W., Miglioretti, D.L., et al.: Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290(16), 2129–2137 (2003)
American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston (2003)
Kallergi, M.: Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters. Medical physics 31(2), 26–314 (2004)
Manning, D.J., Ethell, S.C., Donovan, T.: Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph. Br. J. Radiol. 77(915), 231 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rawashdeh, M.A., Mello-Thoms, C., Bourne, R., Brennan, P.C. (2014). Mammography: Radiologist and Image Characteristics That Determine the Accuracy of Breast Cancer Diagnosis. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_101
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_101
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07886-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07887-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)