Abstract
With the recent emergence of intimate Live Art and performance practices in the past decades, involving artists and audiences interacting in close physical proximity and one-to-one communication, the body is brought centre stage as the site and material of aesthetic experience. Artists working with these modes of address aim to heighten and intensify the experience of the artwork, through the charged energy of face-to-face confrontation, exchange and close bodily proximity. Our particular interest as artistic practitioners is in intimate body-focused aesthetic experiences, mediated by digital technologies that explore the interactions between physiological processes, bodily sensation and subjectivity. In contrast to autonomous art objects that can be experienced by an individual without any assistance by others, we propose a model of aesthetic experience in which facilitation by artists and witnessing by others are integral components. The guidance and facilitation by artists through an experience is intended to provide safe structures and pathways within which a participant can surrender to the potentially immersive and reflective states of consciousness offered by the artwork. Our framework describes four stages of audience experience and participation that can be used to develop and evaluate body-based Live Art encounters: (1) Welcoming, (2) Fitting and Induction, (3) The Ride, and (4) Debriefing and Documentation. We show the application of our model through two case studies from our artistic practices, illustrating our particular perspective on evaluation as a form of facilitated critique and reflection for audience, as well as artists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovic M, Celant G (2001) Marina Abramovic: public body: installation and objects, 1965–2001. Charta, New York/Milan
Benford S, Giannachi G, Koleva B, Rodden T (2009) From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, pp 709–718
Bilda Z, Costello B, Amitani S (2006) Collaborative analysis framework for evaluating interactive art experience. J CoDesign 2(4):225–238, Taylor and Francis
Biserna E (2012) Exhibition reviews: ‘The Abramović Method’, PAC Padiglione d’Arte Contemporanea, Milan (March-June 2012), NECSUS. Eur J Media Stud 1(2):338–346
Bishop C (ed) (2006) Participation. Whitechapel Gallery/MIT Press, London/Cambridge, MA
Bourriaud N (2002) Relational aesthetics. Les presses du reel (English trans), Djon
Candy L (2014) Evaluation and experience in art. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 25–48
De Looz PA (2011) Pedro Reyes Brings Sanity to Brooklyn. In: Art in America, June 2011
Dewey J (1934) Art as experience. Capricorn Books, New York
Edmonds E (2010) The art of interaction. Digit Creat 21(4):257–264
Edmonds E (2014) Human computer interaction, experience and art. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 11–23
Forlizzi J, Battarbee K (2004) Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing Interactive Systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS ’04). ACM, New York, pp 261–268
Grau O (2003) Charlotte Davies: Osmose. In: Virtual art, from illusion to immersion (Revised edition MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 193–211)
Heddon D, Iball H, Zerihan R (2012) Come closer: confessions of intimate spectators in one to one performance. Contemp Theatre Rev 22(1):120–133, Special issue: live art in the UK, Taylor and Francis
Höök K, Sengers P, Andersson G (2003) Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’03). ACM, New York, pp 241–248
Khut G (2006) Interactive art as embodied enquiry: working with audience experience. In: Edmonds E, Muller L, Turnbull LD (eds) Engage: interaction, arts & audience experience. Creativity and Cognition Studios Press, Sydney, pp 156–167
Khut G (2007) The heart library project. http://georgekhut.com/heartlibrary/
Khut G, Muller L (2005) Evolving creative practice: a reflection on working with audience experience in cardiomorphologies. In: Anastasiou P, Smithies R, Trist K, Jones L (eds) Vital signs: creative practice & new media now. RMIT Publishing, Melbourne
Kortbek K, Grønbæk K (2008) Communicating art through interactive technology: new approaches for interaction design in art museums. In: Tollmar K, Jönsson B (eds) Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: building bridges. ACM international conference proceeding series, ACM, New York, vol 358, pp 229–238
Latulipe C, Carroll EA, Lottridge D (2011) Love, hate, arousal and engagement: exploring audience responses to performing arts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, pp 1845–1854
Loke L, Khut GP, Kocaballi AB (2012) Bodily experience and imagination: designing ritual interactions for participatory live-art contexts. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (DIS ’12). ACM, New York, pp 779–788. doi: 10.1145/2317956.2318073, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2317956.2318073
Muller E, Robertson T, Edmonds E (2006a) The object of interaction – the role of artefacts in interaction design, experience workshops. In: Proceedings of workshop, OZCHI 2006, Sydney, Australia
Muller L, Turner G, Khut G, Edmonds E (2006b) Creating affective visualisations for a physiologically interactive artwork. IV 2006. Tenth international conference on information visualization, 2006, London. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 651–657
O’Reilly S (2009) The body in contemporary art. Thames & Hudson, London
Osthoff S (1997) Lygia Clark and Hélio Oiticica: a legacy of interactivity and participation for a telematic future. Leonardo 30:279–289
Saltz DZ (1997) The art of interaction: interactivity, performativity, and computers. J Aesthet Art Crit 55(2, Spring): 117–127, Perspectives on the arts and technology
Schechner R (2003) Performance theory. Routledge Classics, London
Shusterman R (2000) Performing live: aesthetic alternatives for the ends of art. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Stenslie S (2010) Virtual touch – a study of the user and experience of touch in artistic, multimodal and computer-based environments. Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo
Stenslie S (2010) The blind theatre – 5 manifests for the female sensuality [Online]. Available: http://blindtheater.wordpress.com
Turner V (1982) From ritual to theatre: the human seriousness of play. PAJ Publications, New York
Van Gennep A (1960) The rites of passage. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. Reprint 1977. Originally published 1960
Vergine L (2000) Body art and performance. Skira Editore, Milan
Warr T, Jones A (2000) The artist’s body. Phaidon Press Ltd., London
Zerihan R (2009) One to one performance: a study room guide. Live Art Development Agency, London. Available at: http://www.thisisliveart.co.uk/resources/catalogue/rachel-zerihans-study-room-guide. Accessed 20 Feb 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loke, L., Khut, G.P. (2014). Intimate Aesthetics and Facilitated Interaction. In: Candy, L., Ferguson, S. (eds) Interactive Experience in the Digital Age. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04509-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04510-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)