Abstract
Expectations are high with regards to smart home technology. In particular, smart home technology is expected to support or enable independent living by older adults. This raises the question: can smart home technology contribute to independent living, according to older adults themselves? This chapter aims to answer this question by reviewing and discussing older adults’ perspectives on independence and their views on smart home technology. Firstly, older adults’ opinions on independence and aging in place are discussed. Secondly, this chapter will review to what extent smart home technology can support older adults’ independence. Thirdly, it will be explained how community-dwelling older adults’ concept of independence entails three distinct types or modes, and how these modes are related to their perceptions and acceptance of technology. In the last section of this chapter, an overview of key points is presented, and recommendations for technology designers, policy makers, and care providers are postulated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Reeder et al. (2013) classified studies as “emerging,” “promising,” “effective (first tier),” or “effective (second tier).” The three studies mentioned were not considered “effective (second tier)” by Reeder et al. (2013) because they were limited by the use of a historical control group (Kelly 2005), high dropout rates (Tomita et al. 2007), and the use of nonrandomized comparison groups (Brownsell et al. 2008). None of the studies included in the review by Reeder et al. (2013) were classified as the highest type of evidence, which was “effective (second tier).”
References
Aarts S, van den Akker M, Bosma H et al (2012) The effect of multimorbidity on health related functioning: temporary or persistent? Results from a longitudinal cohort study. J Psychosom Res 73:211–217
Allen RES, Wiles JL (2014) Receiving support when older: what makes it ok? Gerontologist 54:670–682
Balta-Ozkan N, Davidson R, Bicket M, Whitmarsh L (2013) The development of smart homes market in the UK. Energy 60:361–372
Baltes MM, Maas I, Wilms HU et al (1999) Everyday competence in old and very old age: theoretical considerations and empirical findings. In: Baltes PB, Mayer UK (eds) Berlin aging study aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 384–402
Barrett LL (2011) Healthy @ Home 2.0. Available via AARP. http://www.aarp.org/relationships/caregiving/info-03-2008/healthy_home.html. Accessed 10 Nov 2014
Boldy D, Grenade L, Lewin G et al (2011) Older people’s decisions regarding “ageing in place”: a Western Australian case study. Australas J Ageing 30:136–142
Boström M, Kjellström S, Björklund A (2013) Older persons have ambivalent feelings about the use of monitoring technologies. Technol Disabil 25:117–125
Brownsell S, Blackburn S, Hawley MS (2008) An evaluation of second and third generation telecare services in older people’s housing. J Telemed Telecare 14:8–12
Cheng S-T, Fung H, Chan A (2007) Maintaining self-rated health through social comparison in old age. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 62:277–285
Claes V, Devriendt E, Tournoy J, Milisen K (2014) Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. Int J Nurs Stud 52:134–148
Cohen-Mansfield J (2005) Electronic memory aids for community-dwelling elderly persons: attitudes, preferences, and potential utilization. J Appl Gerontol 24:3–20
Doyle J, Bailey C, Ni Scanaill C, van den Berg F (2014) Lessons learned in deploying independent living technologies to older adults’ homes. Univ Access Inf Soc 13:191–204
Eriksson H, Timpka T (2002) The potential of smart homes for injury prevention among the elderly. Inj Control Saf Promot 9:127–131
Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (1994) Why are some people healthy and others not? The determinants of health populations. Walter de Gruyter, New York
Fine M, Glendinning C (2005) Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of “care” and “dependency”. Ageing Soc 25:601–621
Galenkamp H, Plaisier I, Huisman M, et al (2012) Trends in gezondheid en het belang van zelfredzaamheid bij zelfstandig wonende ouderen. Available via RVZ. http://www.rvz.net/publicaties/bekijk/trends-in-gezondheid-en-het-belang-van-zelfredzaamheid-bij-zelfstandig-wone. Accessed 10 Nov 2014
Gillsjö C, Schwartz-Barcott D, von Post I (2011) Home: the place the older adult cannot imagine living without. BMC Geriatr 11:1–10
Graybill EM, Mcmeekin P, Wildman J (2014) Can aging in place be cost effective ? A systematic review. PLoS One 9:1–6
Hargreaves T, Wilson C (2013) Who uses smart home technologies ? Representations of users by the smart home industry. Paper presented at the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ECEEE) 2013 summer study, Toulon/Hyères, France, June 2013
Kelly D (2005) Smart support at home: the integration of telecare technology with primary and community care systems. Br J Healthc Comput Inf Manag 22:19–21
Lee C, Coughlin JF (2014) PERSPECTIVE: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J Prod Innov Manag. doi:10.1111/jpim.12176
Lindley S, Harper R, Sellen A (2008) Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In: England D (ed) BCS-HCI ’08 proceedings of the 22nd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: culture, creativity, interaction – vol 1. British Computer Society, Swinton, pp 77–86
Lorenzen-Huber L, Boutain M, Camp LJ et al (2010) Privacy, technology, and aging: a proposed framework. Ageing Int 36:232–252
Mitzner T, Boron J, Fausset C (2010) Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav 26:1710–1721
Neven L (2010) “But obviously not for me”: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol Health Illn 32:335–347
Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, et al (2012) Research on the sustained use of technology to support aging in place by community dwelling older adults. Paper presented at the Ambient Assististed Living Forum, Eindhoven, Sept 2012
Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J et al (2014) Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 83:235–248
Peetoom KKB, Lexis MAS, Joore M, et al (2014) Literature review on monitoring technologies and their outcomes in independently living elderly people. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 1–24 doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.961179
Pinquart M (2001) Correlates of subjective health in older adults: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 16:414–426
Pol M, van Nes F, van Hartingsveldt M, et al (2014) Older people’s perspectives regarding the use of sensor monitoring in their home. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu104
Reeder B, Meyer E, Lazar A et al (2013) Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 82:565–579
Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1987) Human aging: usual and successful. Science 237:143–149
Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1997) Successful aging. Gerontologist 37:433–440
Rush KL, Watts WE, Stanbury J (2013) Older adults’ perceptions of weakness and ageing. Int J Older People Nurs 8:1–9
Schulz R, Wahl H-W, Matthews JT et al (2014) Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist. doi:10.1093/geront/gnu071
Sixsmith A (1986) Independence and home in later life. In: Phillipson C, Bernard M, Strang P (eds) Dependency and interdependency in old age: theoretical perspectives and policy alternatives. Croom Helm, London, pp 338–348
Sixsmith A, Sixsmith J (2008) Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing Int 32:219–235
Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Kuen Y (2009) Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform 78:788–801
Steggell CD, Hooker K, Bowman S et al (2010) The role of technology for healthy aging among Korean and Hispanic women in the United States: a pilot study. Gerontechnology 9:433–449
Tomita MR, Mann WC, Stanton K, Tomita AD (2007) Use of currently available smart home technology by frail elders process and outcomes. Top Geriatr Rehabil 23:24–34
United Nations (2013) World population ageing 2013. Available via United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeingReport2013.shtml. Accessed 10 Nov 2014
Van Hoof J, Kort HSM, Rutten PGS, Duijnstee MSH (2011) Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: perspectives of older users. Int J Med Inform 80:310–331
Wild K, Boise L, Lundell J, Foucek A (2008) Unobtrusive in-home monitoring of cognitive and physical health: reactions and perceptions of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 27:181–200
Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N et al (2012) The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist 52:357–366
Wilson C, Hargreaves T, Hauxwell-Baldwin R (2014) Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 19(2):463–476
Woo J, Leung J (2014) Multi-morbidity, dependency, and frailty singly or in combination have different impact on health outcomes. Age 36:923–931
Woolhead G, Calnan M, Dieppe P, Tadd W (2004) Dignity in older age: what do older people in the United Kingdom think? Age Ageing 33:165–170
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Peek, S.T.M., Aarts, S., Wouters, E.J.M. (2017). Can Smart Home Technology Deliver on the Promise of Independent Living?. In: van Hoof, J., Demiris, G., Wouters, E. (eds) Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01583-5_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01583-5_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01582-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01583-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering