Patient-Centric Approach for Utilising Machine Learning to Predict Health-Related Quality of Life Changes During Chemotherapy | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Patient-Centric Approach for Utilising Machine Learning to Predict Health-Related Quality of Life Changes During Chemotherapy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2024)

Abstract

Patients undergoing chemotherapy often experience adverse effects, which can lead to changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and have detrimental effects on patients’ physical and psychological wellbeing. This study aims to apply machine learning (ML) models to patient-reported, clinical, and demographic data to predict changes in physical well-being, social functioning, role functioning, usual activities, and mobility at 6, 12 and 18 weeks from starting chemotherapy. A patient-centric approach is followed as outcome variables were selected after consultation with patients and a clinician, who also was involved in the study design. Logistic regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and multilayer perceptron were developed and their performance of predicting improvement and deterioration in HRQOL was evaluated with accuracy, recall, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Model performance was generally better when predicting improvement, with best models giving AUC of 0.904 for predicting mobility improvement at 12 weeks and AUC of 0.898 for predicting usual activities improvement at 18 weeks. The results encourage involving stakeholders in research and support the view that ML can be used to predict outcomes meaningful to patients. They also highlight that although some outcome variables can be valuable for patients, they may not be predicted well by ML models. This study can inform future work on patient-centric ML methods contributing to treatment decisions in oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 7550
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 9437
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kowal, M., Douglas, F., Jayne, D., Meads, D.: Patient choice in colorectal cancer treatment – a systematic review and narrative synthesis of attribute-based stated preference studies. Colorectal Dis. 24(11), 1295–1307 (2022). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/codi.16242

  2. Xuyi, W., Seow, H., Sutradhar, R.: Artificial neural networks for simultaneously predicting the risk of multiple co-occurring symptoms among patients with cancer. Cancer Med. 10(3), 989–998 (2021). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cam4.3685

  3. Shehab, M., et al.: Machine learning in medical applications: a review of state-of-the-art methods. Comput. Biol. Med. 145, 105458 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kingsley, C., Patel, S.: Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Educ. 17, 137–144 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sim, J.-A., et al.: The major effects of health-related quality of life on 5-year survival prediction among lung cancer survivors: applications of machine learning. Sci. Rep. 10, 10693 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Y., Hosin, A.A., George, M.J., Asselbergs, F.W., Shah, A.D.: Digitaltechnology and patient and public involvement (PPI) in routine care and clinical research—a pilot study. PLoS ONE 18, e0278260 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wójcik, Z., et al.: Using machine learning to predict unplanned hospital utilization and chemotherapy management from patient-reported outcome measures. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 8, e2300264 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, K., Bellanger, M., Le Lann, S., Robert, M., Frenel, J.-S., Campone, M.: The predictive value of patient-reported outcomes on the impact of breast cancer treatment-related quality of life. Front. Oncol. 12, 925534 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y., et al.: Predicting late symptoms of head and neck cancer treatment using LSTM and patient reported outcomes. In: Proceedings of the International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium, vol. 2021, pp. 273–279, July 2021

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jha, D., et al.: Ensuring trustworthy medical artificial intelligence through ethical and philosophical principles, September 2023. arXiv:2304.11530 [cs]

  11. Absolom, K., et al.: Phase III randomized controlled trial of eRAPID: eHealth intervention during chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 734–747 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dolan, P.: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med. Care 35, 1095–1108 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cella, D.F., et al.: The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J. Clin. Oncol. 11, 570–579 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aaronson, N.K., et al.: The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85, 365–376 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. King, M.T., et al.: Meta-analysis provides evidence-based effect sizes for a cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, the FACT-G. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63, 270–281 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Musoro, J.Z., et al.: Minimally important differences for interpreting EORTC QLQC30 scores in patients with advanced breast cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 3, pkz037 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aljrees, T.: Improving prediction of cervical cancer using KNN imputer and multimodel ensemble learning. PLoS ONE 19, e0295632 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shafique, R., et al.: Breast cancer prediction using fine needle aspiration features and upsampling with supervised machine learning. Cancers 15, 681 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christodoulou, E., Ma, J., Collins, G.S., Steyerberg, E.W., Verbakel, J.Y., Van Calster, B.: A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 110, 12–22 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients and clinicians participating in the eRAPID clinical trial for providing the data; Patient Centred Outcomes Research (PCOR) Group in the University of Leeds, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds Institute of Medical Research for consultations of initial study design; and patient representatives of the Use My Data for discussing research relevance. This work was supported in part by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) [CDT grant number EP/S024336/1].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuzanna Wójcik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2. Removed features based on correlation analysis.
Table 3. Number of missing data in each variable for each outcome at 18 weeks.
Table 4. Deterioration prediction results with hyperparameters used for model development.
Table 5. Improvement prediction results with hyperparameters used for model development.
Table 6. Feature importance ranks for physical well-being changes at 18 weeks prediction models LR and RF.
Table 7. Feature importance ranks for usual activities changes at 18 weeks prediction models LR and RF.
Table 8. Feature importance ranks for mobility changes at 18 weeks prediction models LR and RF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wójcik, Z., Dimitrova, V., Warrington, L., Velikova, G., Absolom, K. (2024). Patient-Centric Approach for Utilising Machine Learning to Predict Health-Related Quality of Life Changes During Chemotherapy. In: Finkelstein, J., Moskovitch, R., Parimbelli, E. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14844. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66538-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66538-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-66537-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-66538-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics