Abstract
The community archive can be a powerful tool for territorial investigation and simultaneously a collaborative approach to learn and act in social innovation and urban regeneration processes. This study presents a methodological advancement for defining a community-based archive based on participatory mutual learning between experts and community inhabitants, aimed at co-identifying shared values by the context’s spatial, social, cultural and environmental dimensions. If, on the one hand, non-formal training experiences represent an opportunity to re-understand the territory together through community engagement and empowerment actions, on the other, they produce data and tools that become interfaces to interact with in the decision-making processes that the archive is constantly called upon to define. The Atena Archive project, in the village of Atena Lucana in the province of Salerno, Italy, represents the context in which the methodological advancement was structured and applied in some parts.
The research, therefore, aims to examine the role of the community archive in territorial transformative processes, structure a value-centred approach for activating a community archive, and identify the decision-making processes to active during the census processes to make communities protagonists choose what to archive collaboratively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McKemmish, S.: Are Records Ever Actual? Presented at the (1998)
Burgum, S.: This city is an archive: squatting history and Urban authority. J. Urban Hist. 48, 504–522 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220955165
Rayner, J.: The city (as) archive: are your memories in place? Landsc. Res. 47, 829–839 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2022.2077923
Zavala, J., Migoni, A.A., Caswell, M., Geraci, N., Cifor, M.: ‘A process where we’re all at the table’: community archives challenging dominant modes of archival practice. Archives Manuscripts. 45, 202–215 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2017.1377088
Caswell, M., Migoni, A.A., Geraci, N., Cifor, M.: To be able to imagine otherwise: community archives and the importance of representation. Arch. Rec. 38, 5–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2016.1260445
Poole, A.H.: The information work of community archives: a systematic literature review. J. Documentation. 76, 657–687 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2019-0140/FULL/XML
Gilliland, A., Flinn, A.: Community Archives: what are we really talking about? CIRN Prato Community Inf. Conf. 2013, 1–23 (2013)
Sabharwal, A.: Functional frameworks for socialised digital curation: curatorial interventions and curation spaces in archives and libraries. Libr. Trends 69, 672–695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1353/LIB.2021.0009
Liew, C.L., Goulding, A., Nichol, M.: From shoeboxes to shared spaces: participatory cultural heritage via digital platforms. Inf. Commun. Soc. 25, 1293–1310 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851391
Benoit, I.I.I.E., Eveleigh, A.: Defining and framing participatory archives in archival science. In: Benoit, I.I.I.E., Eveleigh, A. (eds.) Participatory archives, pp. 1–12. Facet (2019). https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303588.001
Flinn, A.: Community histories, community archives: some opportunities and challenges. J. Soc. Arch. 28, 151–176 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., Shepherd, E., Flinn, A., Stevens, Á.M., Shepherd, Á.E.: Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Arch. Sci. 9, 71–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
Caswell, M., Cifor, M., Ramirez, M.H.: To suddenly discover yourself existing: uncovering the impact of community archives. Am. Archivist 79(1), 56–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.56
Gilliland A.: Conceptualising 21st-century archives. Soc. Am. Archivists, 20–1 (2014)
Vukliš, V., Gilliland, A.J.: Archival activism: emerging forms, local applications. In: Filej B (ed.) Archives in the Service of People – People in the Service of Archives, pp. 14–25. Alma Mater Europea, Maribor (2016)
Shilton, K., Srinivasan, R.: Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections. Archivaria, 87–101 (2007)
Scholz, R.W.: The mutual learning sessions. In: Klein, J.T., Häberli, R., Scholz, R.W., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Bill, A., Welti, M. (eds.) Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society, pp. 117–129. Birkhäuser Basel, Basel (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_11
Klein, J.T., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Häberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R.W., Welti, M.: Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science, Technology, and Society? An Effective way for Managing Complexity. eweb:227887
Bunders, J.F.G., Broerse, J.E.W., Keil, F., Pohl, C., Scholz, R.W., Zweekhorst, M.B.M.: How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? In: Roeland, J., in ’t Veld, (eds.) Knowledge Democracy: Consequences for Science, Politics, and Media, pp. 125–152. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_11
Rist, S., Zimmermann, A., Wiesmann, U.: From epistemic monoculture to cooperation between epistemic communities-lessons learnt from development research
Polk, M., Knutsson, P.: Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environ. Educ. Res. 14, 643–653 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802464841
Ventre, S., Cerreta, M.: Participatory art and co-creation methodology in the “viale delle metamorfosi.” In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Garau, C., Scorza, F., Karaca, Y., Torre, C.M. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37117-2.
Roeschley, A., Kim, J.: Something that feels like a community: the role of personal stories in building community-based participatory archives. Arch. Sci. 19, 27–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09302-2
La Rocca, L., Mazzarella, C., Regalbuto, S., Somma, M., Imbriaco, A.: Community archive as place-based decision-making process: a proposal for the Archivio Atena. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 14108 LNCS, 209–225 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37117-2_16/FIGURES/2
Cerreta, M., Panaro, S., Poli, G.: A spatial decision support system for multifunctional landscape assessment: a transformative resilience perspective for vulnerable inland areas. Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2748 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13052748
Farber, S.C., Costanza, R., Wilson, M.A.: Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 41, 375–392 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5
Fish, R.,et al.: Participatory and Deliberative Techniques for Embeddingan Ecosystems Approach into Decision Making. Project Report. Defra, London, UK (2011)
O’Neill, J.: Markets, Deliberation and Environment. Routledge. London, UK (2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203607169
Kenter, J.O.: Editorial: shared, plural and cultural values. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 175–183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2016.10.010
Kenter, J.O., et al.: What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecol. Econ. 111, 86–99 (2015)
Cerreta, M.: Cultural, creative, community hub: dai valori condivisi ai valori sociali condivisi per la rigenerazione della città storica. In: Abitare il future, pp. 134–146. CLEAN, Napoli (2016)
Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L., Uyttenhove, P.: Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: a review of methods. Ecosyst. Serv. 37, 100925 (2019)
Keeney, R.: Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision-Making. Long Range Plann. 2 (1996)
Mariotti, I., Riganti, P.: Valuing urban regeneration projects: the case of the Navigli, Milan. City Cult. Soc. 26, 100415 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100415
Geertz, C.: The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic books (1973)
Harrison, L.E., Huntington, S.P.: Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. Basic books New York, New York (2000)
Throsby, D.: Economics and Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out within the framework of GRINS - Growing Resilient, INclusive and Sustainable and received funding from the European Union Next-GenerationEU (NATIONAL RECOVERY AND RESILIENCE PLAN (NRRP), MISSION 4, COMPONENT 2, INVESTMENT 1.3 - D.D. 1558 11/10/2022, PE000018, Spoke 7 Territorial sustainability). This manuscript reflects solely the views and opinions of the authors, neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible (https://www.grins.it/progetto). Specially thank the “Pignata house census” working group in the persons of Joyce Donnarumma, Salvatore Medici, Marianna De Nigris, inhabitants of Atena Lucana, Chiara Solimene student of the ISIA of Urbino and Fabrizio Pignata for their collaboration. The group of designers “Opera Paese” in particular, Alessandro Imbriaco, Martina Alessandrini, Benedetta Cestelli Guidi, and Alessandro Coco, who teach at the Scuola Alta Formazione together with Prof. Giovanni Michetti.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors jointly conceived and developed the approach and decided on the overall objective and structure of the paper: Conceptualization, M.S., L.LR. And C.L; Methodology, M.S. and L.LR.; Validation, M.S.; Formal Analysis, M.S, L.LR and C.L; Investigation M.S, L.LR and C.L; Data Curation, M.S, L.LR and C.L, Writing-Original Draft Preparation, M.S, L.LR.; Writing-Review and Editing, M.S. and L.LR.; Visualization, M.S, L.LR and C.L; Supervision, M.S and L.LR. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article’s content.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Somma, M., La Rocca, L., Loffredo, C. (2024). A Methodological Approach for Activate a Community-Based Archive as a Decision-Support System in Urban Regeneration Processes. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Garau, C., Taniar, D., C. Rocha, A.M.A., Faginas Lago, M.N. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2024 Workshops. ICCSA 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14820. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65285-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65285-1_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-65284-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-65285-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)