Abstract
Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is a radiotherapy treatment modality that has proven to be able to properly irradiate tumors while preserving as much as possible normal tissues. However, it is extremely vulnerable to several different sources of uncertainties, which motivates the use of robust treatment planning optimization. In this work we describe a new approach for robust automated IMPT treatment optimization, based on a set of auxiliary structures that are shifted versions of each one of the volumes of interest (clinical target volume - CTV and organs-at-risk - OARs), and that are named clones. This approach is compared with the use of a pseudo-Planning Target Volume (PTV) and pseudo-planning OAR volumes built by the union of all the CTV and OAR clones, respectively. For proof-of-concept, the proposed methodologies were tested using five post-operative prostate cancer cases. The quality of the calculated treatment plans was assessed by Monte Carlo simulation. For IMPT treatment plan robust optimization, the new strategy based on the use of clones using shifts of 6 mm presented better results in terms of robustness when compared with the traditional PTV-based approach. Taking uncertainties into consideration during the planning process can be an option to overcome one of the major drawbacks of IMPT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Evans, E., Staffurth, J.: Principles of cancer treatment by radiotherapy. Surg. Oxf. 36, 111–116 (2018)
Shepard, D.M., Ferris, M.C., Olivera, G.H., Mackie, T.R.: Optimizing the delivery of radiation therapy to cancer patients. SIAM Rev. 41, 721–744 (1999)
Brady, L.W., Heilmann, H.P., Molls, M.: New Technologies in Radiation Oncology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29999-8
Song, J., Shi, Z., Sun, B., Shi, L.: Treatment planning for volumetric-modulated arc therapy: Model and heuristic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 12, 116–126 (2014)
Wang, F., Huang, Y.-L., Ju, F.: Simulation optimization gantry call-back control method for proton therapy systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 20, 1565–1576 (2022)
Mohan, R., Grosshans, D.: Proton therapy-present and future. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 109, 26–44 (2017)
ICRU, Prescibing, Recording and Reporting Proton-Beam Therapy (ICRU Report 78). J. ICRU (2007)
Dias, J., Rocha, H., Ventura, T., Ferreira, B., Lopes, M.C.: Automated fluence map optimization based on fuzzy inference systems. Med. Phys. 43, 1083–1095 (2016)
Cao, W., et al.: Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 67, 13TR01 (2022)
Rocha, H., Dias, J.M., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Combinatorial optimization for an improved transition from fluence optimization to fluence delivery in IMRT treatment planning. Optimization 61, 969–987 (2012)
Lim, G.J., Cao, W.: A two-phase method for selecting IMRT treatment beam angles: branch-and-Prune and local neighborhood search. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 217, 609–618 (2012)
Bertsimas, D., Cacchiani, V., Craft, D., Nohadani, O.: A hybrid approach to beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Comput. Oper. Res. 40, 2187–2197 (2013)
Rocha, H., Dias, J.M., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Selection of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment beam directions using radial basis functions within a pattern search methods framework. J. Glob. Optim. 57, 1065–1089 (2013)
Dias, J., Rocha, H., Ferreira, B., Lopes, M.C.: A genetic algorithm with neural network fitness function evaluation for IMRT beam angle optimization. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 22, 431–455 (2014)
Lim, G.J., Kardar, L., Cao, W.: A hybrid framework for optimizing beam angles in radiation therapy planning. Ann. Oper. Res. 217, 357–383 (2014)
Rocha, H., Dias, J.M., Ventura, T., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Beam angle optimization in IMRT: are we really optimizing what matters? Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 26, 908–928 (2019)
Gutierrez, M., Cabrera-Guerrero, G., Lagos, C.: A Reduced Variable Neighbourhood Search for the Beam Angle Optimisation Problem. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 7, 1499–1510 (2023)
Chan, T.C., Craig, T., Lee, T., Sharpe, M.B.: Generalized inverse multiobjective optimization with application to cancer therapy. Oper. Res. 62, 680–695 (2014)
Wedenberg, M., Beltran, C., Mairani, A., Alber, M.: Advanced treatment planning. Med. Phys. 45, e1011–e1023 (2018)
Unkelbach, J., Paganetti, H.: Robust proton treatment planning: physical and biological optimization. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 28, 88–96 (2018)
McGowan, S.E., Burnet, N.G., Lomax, A.J.: Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy. Br. J. Radiol. 86, 20120288–20120288 (2013)
Wahl, N., Hennig, P., Wieser, H.P., Bangert, M.: Efficiency of analytical and sampling-based uncertainty propagation in intensity-modulated proton therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 5790 (2017)
Wahl, N., Hennig, P., Wieser, H.-P., Bangert, M.: Analytical incorporation of fractionation effects in probabilistic treatment planning for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Med. Phys. 45, 1317–1328 (2018)
Liu, W., et al.: Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. Med. Phys. 40, 051711 (2013)
Zaghian, M., Cao, W., Liu, W., Kardar, L., Randeniya, S., Mohan, R., Lim, G.: Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for “worst case dose” and “minmax” robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 18, 15–25 (2017)
Khoo, E.L., et al.: Prostate contouring variation: can it be fixed? Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 82, 1923–1929 (2012)
Unkelbach, J., et al.: Robust radiotherapy planning. Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 22TR02 (2018)
Liu, W., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Mohan, R.: Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy. Med. Phys. 39, 1079–1091 (2012)
Mohan, R., Das, I.J., Ling, C.C.: Empowering intensity modulated proton therapy through physics and technology: an overview. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 99, 304–316 (2017)
Fredriksson, A., Forsgren, A., Hardemark, B.: Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy. Med. Phys. 38, 1672–1684 (2011)
Wieser, H.P., et al.: Development of the open-source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad. Med. Phys. 44, 2556–2568 (2017)
Acknowledgments
This work has been partly supported by the Fundação para a Ciëncia e a Tecnologia (FCT) under project grants UTA-EXPL/FMT/0079/2019, UIDB/00645/2020, UIDB/00308/2020 and UIDB/05037/2020 with DOI 10.54499/ UIDB/05037/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Neves, J., Rocha, H., Ferreira, B., Dias, J. (2024). Robust Optimization for IMPT: Introducing and Comparing Different Automated Approaches. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Garau, C., Taniar, D., C. Rocha, A.M.A., Faginas Lago, M.N. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2024 Workshops. ICCSA 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14816. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65223-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65223-3_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-65222-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-65223-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)