The Paradox of Information Systems in Crisis: Walking the Tight Rope Between Rigidity and Flexibility | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

The Paradox of Information Systems in Crisis: Walking the Tight Rope Between Rigidity and Flexibility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction (ITDRR 2023 2023)

Abstract

Crisis situations ask for relevant, accurate and complete information to support decision makers. Today there is a plethora of systems available to crisis responders to generate, accumulate and process information. These systems and (infra) structures are often developed, established, and implemented outside crisis situations as part of preparedness activities. At the same time, crisis situations are often characterized by their volatility and uncertainty. Both in terms of the effects of the disaster, but also in the response to the disaster, and often require a tailored approach. In this research we examine trade-offs between the preparedness of information systems, and the flexibility needed to adapt to operational and crisis specific circumstances. We conduct this research through case studies centered around two large-scale emergencies and discuss the challenges in managing the ‘rigidity-adaptability’ balance for emergency responders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 9151
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Comes, T., Meesters, K., Torjesen, S.: Making sense of crises: the implications of information asymmetries for resilience and social justice in disaster-ridden communities. Sustain. Resilient Infrastruct. 4(3), 124–136 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1405653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Borkulo, E., Scholten, H.J., Zlatanova, S., van den Brink, A.: Decision making in response and relief phases Geo-information for Disaster Management. First Int. Symp. Geo-inf. Disaster Manage. Delft 31–23(2005), 47–53 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dynes R.R. and Quarantelli, E.L.: Organization communications and decision making in crises, pp. 58 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gralla, E., Goentzel, J., Van de Walle, B.: Understanding the information needs of field-based decision-makers in humanitarian response to sudden onset disasters In: International Systems Crisis Response and Management (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. van den Homberg, M., Meesters, K., Van de Walle, B.: Coordination and information management in the Haiyan response: Observations from the field. Proc. Eng. 78, 49–51 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meesters, K.: Crisis information management: from technological potential to societal impact, The New Common, p. 153 (2021)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65355-2_22

  7. Olafsson, G.: Humanitarian response in the age of mass collaboration and networked intelligence In: Washington dc: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y., Meesters, K.: Assessing barriers in information sharing via serious games: a case study of DIMB, In: European Conference on Games Based Learning, pp. 664-XVII, (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boersma, K., Ferguson, J., Groenewegen, P., Wolbers, J.: Beyond the myth of control: toward network switching in disaster management, In: ISCRAM, pp. 123–127 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schraagen, J.M., et al.: Information sharing during crisis management in hierarchical vs. network teams. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 18(2), 117–127 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00604.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Derczynski, L., Meesters, K., Bontcheva, K., Maynard, D. J. A. P. A.: Helping crisis responders find the informative needle in the tweet haystack (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Comes, T., Meesters, K., XNespeca, V.: hurricane harvey report: A fact-finding effort in the direct aftermath of Hurricane Harvey in the Greater Houston Region,” Self-published, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ravichandran, T., et al.: Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 21(4), 237–276 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gralla, E., Goentzel, J., Van de Walle, B. A.: Understanding the information needs of field-based decision-makers in humanitarian response to sudden onset disasters, In: ISCRAM, (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bharosa, N., et al.: Technology, and Work, a research agenda for information quality assurance in public safety networks: Information orchestration as the middle ground between hierarchical and netcentric approaches, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 203–216 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thapa, D., Budhathoki, N., Munkvold, B.E.: Analyzing crisis response through actor-network theory: the case of kathmandu living labs. Communi. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 41, 414–428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van De Ven, J. van Rijk, R. Essens, P, and Frinking, E.: Network centric operations in crisis management. In: 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC, USA, (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berger, A.: Continuous improvement and kaizen: standardization and organizational designs, 8(2), pp.110–117 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gough, J., Hamrell, Mi.: Standard operating procedures (SOPs): Why companies must have them, and why they need them. Drug Inf. J. 43(1), 69–74 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150904300112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isaman, V., Thelin, R.: Standard operating procedures (SOPs): reason for, types of, adequacy, approval, and deviations from and revisions to, Quality Assurance (San Diego Calif.) vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 167–171 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Comfort, L.K., Ko, K., Zagorecki, A.: Coordination in rapidly evolving disaster response systems: the role of information. Am. Behav. Sci. 48(3), 295–313 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204268987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turoff, M., et al.: The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system (DERMIS), vol. 5, no. 4, p. 3 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Geneviève, D., Sébastien, T., Simon, B., Vincent, R.: Team performance and adaptability in crisis management: a comparison of cross-functional and functional teams. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. Annu. Meet. 54(19), 1610–1614 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193121005401953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weijman, S., Meesters, K.: Shifting control and trust: exploring implications of introducing delegated decision support systems. In: Proceedings of the 17th ISCRAM Conference, pp. 285–294 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khanpour, M. Meesters, K., Paulus, D.: The reality of evidence-based decision making in humanitarian programming: An Exploratory Study of WASH Programs in Uganda, 2020 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), pp. 1–8, (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keith, N., Frese, M.: Effectiveness of error management training: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 93(1), 59–69 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Klein, G., Wolf, S.: Decision-centered training. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 39(20), 1249–1252 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129503902002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meesters, K., Wang, Y.: Information management in large-scale disaster exercises: an integrated perspective. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Information Systems, (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meier, K.J., Plumlee, J.P.: Regulatory administration and organizational rigidity. West. Polit. Q. 31(1), 80–95 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1177/106591297803100108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nespeca, V., Comes, T., Meesters, K., Brazier, F.: Towards coordinated self-organization: an actor-centered framework for the design of disaster management information systems. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 51, 101887 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meesters, K., Ou, C., Alexiou, A.: Towards a model for building information awareness in crisis situations. AMCIS 2022 Proceedings. 11 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yin, R.K.: Case study methods (2012)https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-009

  33. EM-DAT, D. G.-S.: EM-DAT: the emergency events database,” U. c. d. L. (UCL), Ed., ed. Brussels, Belgium (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Soltwisch, B. W.: The paradox of organizational rigidity: A contingency model for information processing during times of opportunity and threat, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 395–403 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., Dutton, J.E.: Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Adm. Sci. Q. 26(4), 501 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenny Meesters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Meesters, K., Alexiou, A., Ou, C. (2024). The Paradox of Information Systems in Crisis: Walking the Tight Rope Between Rigidity and Flexibility. In: Dugdale, J., Gjøsæter, T., Uchida, O. (eds) Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. ITDRR 2023 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 706. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64037-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64037-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-64036-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-64037-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics