Abstract
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) contributes to alleviating ground traffic pressure, enhancing traffic efficiency, and promoting sustainable transportation development. The modular design of vehicles, exemplified by Airbus Pop.Up, further improves traffic efficiency. Currently, UAM development is in the preparatory stage, with a research gap in the study of cabin Human-Machine Interface (HMI). Based on the concepts of UAM and modular transportation, this study focuses on the cockpit HMI design for Land-Air Travel Service, referred to as LADUC (Land-Air Dual-Use Cabin) HMI. The research goal is to propose design guidance strategies for the usability and user-friendliness of HMI in LADUC.
In the preliminary phase, a combination of field research, desktop research, user studies integrating questionnaire surveys and in-depth interviews, along with Work Domain Analysis, was conducted. Based on the acquired user requirements and expectations, a functional architecture diagram for the central control screen and dashboard of LADUC was constructed. Usability tests were conducted in both low-fidelity and high-fidelity stages, with the test results indicating that the system has achieved preliminary usability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Concept of Operations. Federal Aviation Administration (2023)
Schweiger, K., Preis, L.: Urban air mobility: systematic review of scientific publications and regulations for vertiport design and operations. DRONES 6(7) (2022)
Cohen, A.P., Shaheen, S.A., Farrar, E.M.: Urban air mobility: history, ecosystem, market potential, and challenges. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 22(9), 6074–6087 (2021)
EHANG, Future Mobility: White Paper on Urban Air Transport Systems (2020)
Li, C., et al.: Overview of traffic management of urban air mobility (UAM) with eVTOL aircraft. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 20(4), 35–54 (2020)
Wei, Q.S., Nilsson, G., Coogan, S.: Safety verification for urban air mobility scheduling. In: IFAC PAPERSONLINE. 2022: 9th IFAC Conference on Networked Systems (NECSYS), pp. 306–311 (2022)
Bennaceur, M., Delmas, R., Hamadi, Y.: Passenger-centric urban air mobility: fairness trade-offs and operational efficiency. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 136 (2022)
Bulanowski, K., et al.: AURORA-creating space for urban air mobility in our cities. In: Nathanail, E.G., Gavanas, N., Adamos, G. (eds.) CSUM 2022, pp. 1568–1585. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23721-8_122
Koumoutsidi, A., Pagoni, I., Polydoropoulou, A.: A new mobility era: stakeholders’ insights regarding urban air mobility. Sustainability 14(5) (2022)
Yavas, V., Tez, O.Y.: Consumer intention over upcoming utopia: urban air mobility. J. Air Transport Manag. 107 (2023)
Maia, F.D., Da Saude, J.: The state of the art and operational scenarios for urban air mobility with unmanned aircraft. Aeronaut. J. 125(1288), 1034–1063 (2021)
Perperidou, D.G., Kirgiafinis, D.: Urban air mobility (UAM) integration to urban planning. In: Nathanail, E.G., Gavanas, N., Adamos, G. (eds.) CSUM 2022, pp. 1676–1686 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23721-8_130
Lerro, A.: Survey of certifiable air data systems for urban air mobility. In: 2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) Proceedings, 39th AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) (2020)
Jha, A., et al.: Urban air mobility: a preliminary case study for Chicago and Atlanta. In: 2022 IEEE/AIAA Transportation Electrification Conference and Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (ITEC+EATS 2022). 2022: IEEE/AIAA Transportation Electrification Conference/Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (ITEC+EATS), pp. 300–306 (2022)
Postorino, M.N., Sarne, G.: Reinventing mobility paradigms: flying car scenarios and challenges for urban mobility. Sustainability 12(9) (2020)
Liberacki, A., et al.: The environmental life cycle costs (ELCC) of urban air mobility (UAM) as an input for sustainable urban mobility. J. Clean. Prod. 389 (2023)
Johnson, W.C.: UAM coordination and assessment team (UCAT). In: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Ames (2019)
Vempati, L., et al.: Assessing human-automation role challenges for urban air mobility (UAM) operations. In: 2021 IEEE/AIAA 40th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). IEEE/AIAA 40th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) (2021)
Pongsakornsathien, N., et al.: Human-machine interactions in very-low-level UAS operations and traffic management. In: 2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), San Antonio, TX, USA (2020)
Straubinger, A., Schaumeier, J., Plötner, K.O.: A roadmap for urban air services. In: Delft International Conference on Urban Air Mobility (2022)
Tepylo, N., Straubinger, A., Laliberte, J.: Public perception of advanced aviation technologies: a review and roadmap to acceptance. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 138 (2023)
Johnson, R.A., Miller, E.E., Conrad, S.: Technology adoption and acceptance of urban air mobility systems: identifying public perceptions and integration factors. Int. J. Aerosp. Psychol. 32(4), 240–253 (2022)
Timeline of Drone Integration. Federal Aviation Administration (2022)
Chandarana, M., et al.: Streamlining tactical operator handoffs during multi-vehicle applications. In: IFAC Papersonline. 15th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems (HMS), pp. 79–84 (2022)
Shneiderman, B.: Information-Processing and Human-Machine Interaction - An Approach to Cognitive Engineering - Rasmussen, J.: Information Processing & Management (1), 103 (1988)
Work domain analysis: concepts, guidelines and cases. Ergonomics (11), 1790–1791 (2013)
Ho, D., Burns, C.M.: Ecological interface design in aviation domains: work domain analysis of automated collision detection and avoidance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, no. 1, pp. 119–123 (2003)
Zhang, Y., et al.: Conceptualization of Human Factors in Automated Driving by Work Domain Analysis. SAE Technical Papers (2020)
King, B.J.: Identifying risk controls for future advanced brain-computer interfaces: a prospective risk assessment approach using work domain analysis. Appl. Ergon. 104028 (2023)
Aminoff, H., et al.: Modeling the implementation context of a telemedicine service: work domain analysis in a surgical setting. JMIR Formative Res. (6), e26505 (2021)
Tomitsch, M., et al.: Design. Think. Make. Break. Repeat. A handbook of methods (2018)
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; the High-Level Foreign Expert Project (G2022133031L, G2023133041L); Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (GJHZ20220913142401002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xu, Y., Yang, J., Wang, P., Wang, Y., Wang, J. (2024). User-Centered Design of Land-Air Travel Service: HMI Design Strategies and Challenges. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14733. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60480-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60479-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60480-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)