A Study on the Effects of Different Interaction Modalities on Driving Trust in Automated Vehicles | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Study on the Effects of Different Interaction Modalities on Driving Trust in Automated Vehicles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14732))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 547 Accesses

Abstract

The growing capabilities of Intelligent vehicle interaction systems contribute to the intricacy of interaction methods, subsequently influencing drivers’ trust. This study comprehensively examines prevailing interaction modes of Intelligent vehicles, employing simulated driving experiments and evaluating participants’ trust levels using an automated trust scale across diverse interaction modes. The experiment introduces three specific scenarios: traffic congestion, traffic accidents, and pedestrian crossing. During the formal experiment, participants navigate a simulated urban route, encountering random instances of the specified scenarios during autonomous driving. The interaction system issues prompt when these situations arise. Four distinct interaction modes were crafted: baseline, visual, auditory, and audio-visual. The experimental findings reveal a notably heightened level of human-machine trust in the combined audio-visual interaction mode in contrast to voice and visual interactions. Furthermore, visual interaction is more effective in enhancing driver trust than auditory interaction. In visual interaction, the HUD-based visual interaction significantly elevates driver trust compared with dash-board and central control screen interfaces. This research offers insights for refining the interaction design of autonomous driving vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 20591
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 8293
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reimer, B.: Driver assistance systems and the transition to automated vehicles: a path to increase older adult safety and mobility? Public Policy Aging Rep. 24(1), 27–31 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. SAE International. Automated driving levels of driving automation are defined in new SAE international standard. http://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated_driving.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2023

  3. Hancock, P.A., Nourbakhsh, I., Stewart, J.: On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 7684–7691 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Noah, B.E., Walker, B.N.: Trust calibration through reliability displays in automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 361–362. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azevedo-Sa, H., Jayaraman, S.K., Esterwood, C.T., Yang, X.J., Robert, L.P., Tilbury, D.M.: Real-time estimation of drivers’ trust in automated driving systems. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13, 1911–1927 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clement, P., et al.: Enhancing acceptance and trust in automated driving through virtual experience on a driving simulator. Energies 15(3), 781 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manchon, J.B., Bueno, M., Navarro, J.: How the initial level of trust in automated driving impacts drivers’ behaviour and early trust construction. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol, Behav, 86, 281–295 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qu, J., Zhou, R., Zhang, Y., Ma, Q.: Understanding trust calibration in automated driving: the effect of time, personality, and system warning design. Ergonomics 66(12), 2165–2181 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Itoh, M., Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P.: Trust view from the human-machine cooperation framework. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 3213–3218. Miyazaki, Japan (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ekman, F., Johansson, M., Sochor, J.: Creating appropriate trust in automated vehicle systems: A framework for HMI design. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 48, 95–101 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, Z., Li, W., Liang, J., Pan, X., Xu, W., Shen, M.: Trust in automated vehicles. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 29(12), 2172–2183 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merritt, S.M., Ilgen, D.R.: Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in humanautomation interactions. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. 50(2), 194–210 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. French, B., Duenser, A., Heathcote, A.: Trust in Automation – A Literature Review. CSIRO, Australia (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, C., Yin, G., Wu, Z.: Human-Machine Interface Research of Autonomous Vehicles Based on Cognitive Work Analysis Framework. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Vergnano, A., Leali, F., Taiar, R. (eds.) IHSI 2020. AISC, vol. 1131, pp. 99–103. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, X., et al.: An evaluation method of visualization using visual momentum based on eye-tracking data. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 32, 1850016:1–1850016:25 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cauffman, S.J., Lau, M., Deng, Y., Cunningham, C., Kaber, D.B., Feng, J.: Research and design considerations for presentation of non-safety related information via in-vehicle displays during automated driving. Appl. Sci. 12(20), 10538 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ulahannan, A., Jennings, P., Oliveira, L., Birrell, S.: Designing an adaptive interface: using eye tracking to classify how information usage changes over time in partially automated vehicles. IEEE Access 8, 16865–16875 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, R., Dong, S., Xiao, J.: Research on human-machine natural interaction of intelligent vehicle interface design. J. Mach. Des. 36(2), 132–136 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4, 53–71 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum. Factor 50(3), 449–455 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52205264) and Shanghai Pujiang Program (No. 21PJC032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Guo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qi, B., Guo, Q., Liu, M. (2024). A Study on the Effects of Different Interaction Modalities on Driving Trust in Automated Vehicles. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14732. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60477-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60477-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60476-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60477-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics