Influence of Demographic Variables and Usage Behaviour on the Perceived User Experience | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Influence of Demographic Variables and Usage Behaviour on the Perceived User Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 494))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

Users form an overall impression concerning the user experience (UX) based on their perception of special UX qualities. Therefore, measuring users’ perceptions of these particular UX aspects is essential for determining the UX of a product. The measured hedonic qualities, e.g. stimulation or aesthetics, and pragmatic qualities, e.g. efficiency or learnability, form a suitable overall impression of the perceived user experience of the product. In practice, the measurement of such qualities is often carried out with the help of standardized questionnaires such as the SUS, UMUX, or UEQ. However, the same product sometimes shows large differences in the ratings of different users. It is conceivable that other factors, for example, demographics, usage frequency, or experience with a product, can influence UX ratings. In a previous study (Kollmorgen, Schrepp & Thomaschewski, 2022), the four products Netflix, Microsoft PowerPoint, BigBlueButton, and Zoom were examined for differences in the UX ratings according to such factors. In the present paper, the data set was extended by two additional products of different product categories to deepen and broaden the investigation of the influences of external factors on the perceived UX of products, with a specific focus on their impact on pragmatic and hedonic qualities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 6634
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 8293
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aufderhaar, K., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: Do women and men perceive user experience differently? Int. J Interact. Multimedia Artif. Intell. 5, 63–67 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braun, M., Chadowitz, R., Alt, F.: User experience of driver state visualizations: a look at demographics and personalities. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 158–176. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29390-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooke, J.: SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry 189(194), pp. 4–7. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooke, J.: SUS - A Retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, F.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems - Theory and results. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Devaraj, S., Easley, R.F., Crant, J.M.: Research note - How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Inf. Syst. Res. 19(1), 93–105 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finstad, K.: The Usability Metric for User Experience. Interact. Comput. 22(5), 323–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassenzahl, M.: The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 13(4), 481–499 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassenzahl, M.: Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine on - IHM ‘08, Metz, France: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 11–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1512714.1512717

  10. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Göritz, A.: Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience. Interact. Comput. 22(5), 353–362 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. John, O.P., Srivastava, S.: The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin, L.A., John, O.P. (eds.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research, pp. 102–138. Guilford Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kollmorgen, J., Meiners, A.-L., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: Ermittlung relevanter UX-Faktoren je Produktkategorie für den UEQ+. In Wienrich, C., Wintersberger, P. and Weyers, B. (Ed.). Mensch und Computer 2021 – Workshopband, Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V (2021). https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2021-mci-ws01-362

  13. Kollmorgen, J., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: impact of usage behavior on the user experience of netflix, microsoft powerpoint, bigbluebutton and zoom. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies – WEBIST, Valletta, Malta, pp. 397–406, 2022 (2022a). https://doi.org/10.5220/0011380100003318

  14. Kollmorgen, J., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: Protocol for a comparison of three short user experience questionnaires (2022b). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32773.01760

  15. Kollmorgen, J., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: Protocol for the Influence of demographic variables and usage behavior on the perceived user experience protocol - version 0.1/2023 (2023). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17138.38087

  16. Kortum, P., Oswald, F.L.: The impact of personality on the subjective assessment of usability. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 34(2), 177–186 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) HCI and Usability for Education and Work, pp. 63–76. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis, J.R.: The system usability scale: past, present, and future. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 34(7), 577–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liapis, A., Katsanos, C., Xenos, M., Orphanoudakis, T.: Effect of personality traits on UX evaluation metrics: a study on usability issues, valence-arousal and skin conductance. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCrae, R.R., John, O.P.: An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J. Pers. 60(2), 175–215 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McLellan, S., Muddimer, A., Peres, S.C.: The effect of experience on system usability scale ratings. J. Usability Stud. 7(2), 56–67 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meiners, A.-L., Kollmorgen, J., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: Which UX aspects are important for a software product? In Schneegass, S., Pfleging, B., Kern, D. (Eds.). Mensch und Computer 2021. MuC ‘21: Mensch und Computer 2021. Ingolstadt Germany, 05 09 2021 08 09 2021. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 136–139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3473997

  23. Rummel, B., Schrepp, M.: UX-Fragebögen: was steckt in der Varianz?. In Dachselt, R., Weber, G. (Eds.). Mensch und Computer 2018 – Workshopband, Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). Int. J. Interact. Multimedia Artif. Intell. 4(6), 103–108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schrepp, M. (2021a). User Experience Questionnaires: How to use questionnaires to measure the user experience of your products? KDP. ISBN-13: 979–8736459766

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schrepp, M. (2021b). Measuring User Experience with Modular Questionnaires. In International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), Jakarta, Indonesia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS53237.2021.9631321

  27. Schrepp, M., Kollmorgen, J., Thomaschewski, J.: A Comparison of SUS, UMUX-LITE, and UEQ-S. In Journal of User Experience 18(2), pp. 86–104. DOI

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schrepp, M., et al.: On the Importance of UX Quality Aspects for Different Product Categories. Int. J. Interact Multimedia Artif. Intell. (2023, (in press)). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2023.03.001

  29. Winter, D., Hinderks, A., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: Welche UX-Faktoren sind für mein Produkt wichtig? In Hess, S., Fischer, H. (Ed.). Mensch und Computer 2017 – Usability Professionals, Regensburg: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., pp. 191–200 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2017-up-0002

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer, Emden, Germany

    Jessica Kollmorgen

  2. SAP SE, Walldorf, Germany

    Martin Schrepp

  3. University of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer, Emden, Germany

    Jörg Thomaschewski

Authors
  1. Jessica Kollmorgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Schrepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jörg Thomaschewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Kollmorgen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Padua (UNIPD), Padua, Italy

    Massimo Marchiori

  2. University of Seville, Seville, Spain

    Francisco José Domínguez Mayo

  3. Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal/INSTICC, Setubal, Portugal

    Joaquim Filipe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kollmorgen, J., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J. (2023). Influence of Demographic Variables and Usage Behaviour on the Perceived User Experience. In: Marchiori, M., Domínguez Mayo, F.J., Filipe, J. (eds) Web Information Systems and Technologies. WEBIST 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 494. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43088-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43088-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43087-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43088-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation