Transportation Infrastructures Exposed to Seismic Risk: Evaluation of Social Costs for Resilience Design | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Transportation Infrastructures Exposed to Seismic Risk: Evaluation of Social Costs for Resilience Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops (ICCSA 2023)

Abstract

Seismic risk assessment and management of civil infrastructure systems are prominent topic for researchers. Different methods and approaches were proposed in the past and in this study, a methodology to evaluate social cost due to reduction or loss of serviceability of road network caused by catastrophic event as the liquefaction phenomenon, was developed. The strategy involves the combination of hazard, vulnerability and exposure of the transportation network by means of geotechnical and traffic analyses.

The methodology was applied to the Municipality of Terre del Reno (Italy), that in 2012 was hit by a strong seismic sequence which caused severe liquefaction phenomena on the territory.

Five different seismic events with increasing seismic intensity were simulated and, according to the damage level occurred, a grade of serviceability to the road network, was assigned. For each scenario, a traffic analysis, to evaluate the travel time, was performed and the social cost in terms of Over Delay Cost were evaluated.

The results show an increasing Over Delay Cost as the seismic intensity increases, until the isolation of the Municipality, when a reduction was observed. It can be due a huge number of daily trips forcibly suppressed.

Although the methodology refers to damage caused by liquefaction phenomena, it is simply adaptable to any catastrophic event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 12583
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 15729
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Applied Technology Council project ATC-25. Seismic Vulnerability and Impact of Disruption of Lifelines in the Conterminous United States, Applied Technology Council. USA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Risk Assessment Tools for Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters, RADIUS project. Assessment Tools for Diagnostic of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters. Secrétariat IDNDR (International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction). United Nations. (1996). http://www.geohaz.org/radius/

  3. GEMITIS-Nice Projet, Fort-de-France; Evaluation du risquesismique: programme d’étude (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. RISK-UE project. “An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios, with applications to different European cities” (2001–2004). http://www.risk-ue.net

  5. Japan International Cooperation Agency, JICA project. The study on earthquake disaster mitigation in the Kathmandu Valley. Nippon Koei Co LTD, Final report, Kingdom of Nepal (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. All-Hazard Guide for Transport Infrastructure. © Copyright 2013–2015. The AllTraInConsorsium. http://www.alltrain-project.eu/

  7. STRIT project Homepage. http://www.stress-scarl.com/it/innovazione/i-progetti-nazionali/strit.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2020

  8. Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model HAZUS®MH MR4 Technical Manual. National Institute of Building Sciences. (NIBS). Washington, DC. (2004). http://www.fema.gov/hazus/

  9. Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain (2014). ISBN 978-92-79-33135-0, https://doi.org/10.2788/23242, http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/files/project/proj-overview.html

  10. Molarius, R., et al.: Systemic vulnerability and resilience analysis of electric and transport network failure in cases of extreme winter storms. In: Beer, M., Au, S.-K., Hall, J.W. (eds.) Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Quantification, Mitigation, and Management, pp. 608–617. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. SECURITY MANUAL FOR EUROPEAN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE. Copyright: SecMan Consortium (2013). www.secman-project.eu

  12. Deliverable D400: Importance of the structures for the traffic network. © Copyright 2009–2012. The SeRoN Consortium (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seville, E., Nicholson, A.: Risk and impact of natural hazards on a road network. J. Transp. Eng. (ASCE) 127 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:2(159)

  14. Werner, S.D., et al.: REDARS 2 methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems. Special Report MCEER-06-SP08. Federal Highway Administration (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, L.: Transportation system modeling and applications in earthquake engineering. Doctoral thesis in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karamitros, D.K., Bouckovalas, G.D., Chaloulos, Y.K.: Seismic settlements of shallow foundations on liquefiable soil with a clay crust. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 46, 64–76 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Modoni, G., Spacagna, R.L., Paolella, L., Salvatore, E., Rasulo, A., Martelli, L.: Liquefaction risk assessment: lesson learned from a case study. In: Proceedings of the VI International Conference of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Rome (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pitilakis, K., Crowley, H., Kaynia, A.M. (eds.): SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk. GGEE, vol. 27. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Cascetta, E.: Transportation Systems Analysis. Models and Applications. 2nd edn, pp. 1–752. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75857-2

  20. Fioravante, V., et al.: Earthquake geotechnical engineering aspects: the 2012 Emilia Romagna earthquake (Italy). In: Seventh International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, 29th April–4th May 2013. Chicago (US) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. D’Apuzzo, M., et al.: Strategies for the assessment of risk induced by seismic liquefaction on road networks. In: Beer, M., Zio, E. (eds.) 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference. Copyright ©2019 by ESREL2019 Organizers, pp. 1651–1658. Published by Research Publishing, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-11-2724-3_0589-cd

  22. D’Apuzzo, M., et al.: Simplified approach for liquefaction risk assessment of transportation systems: preliminary outcomes. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12255, pp. 130–145. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Italian Institute of Statistic (ISTAT). https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/139381

  24. Emilia-Romagna Region. https://servizissiir.regione.emilia-romagna.it/FlussiMTS/

  25. Spacagna, R.L., Rasulo, A., Modoni, G.: Geostatistical analysis of settlements induced by groundwater extraction. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10407, pp. 350–364. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. D’Apuzzo, M., et al.: Seismic resilience assessment strategy for social and sustainability impact evaluation on transportation road network: a seismic liquefaction-induced damage application. Sustainability 14(14), 8411 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the EU funded project LIQUEFACT “Assessment and mitigation of liquefaction potential across Europe: a holistic approach to protect structures/infrastructures for improved resilience to earthquake-induced liquefaction disasters”, project ID 700748 funded under the H2020-DRS-2015. This study was also carried out within the MOST – Sustainable Mobility Center and received funding from the European Union Next-GenerationEU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR) – MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4 – D.D. 1033 17/06/2022, CN00000023). The research leading to these results has also received funding by Project “Ecosistema dell’innovazione Rome Technopole” financed by EU in NextGenerationEU plan through MUR Decree n. 1051 23.06.2022 - CUP H33C22000420001. This manuscript reflects only the authors’ views and opinions, neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro D’Apuzzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

D’Apuzzo, M., Evangelisti, A., Cappelli, G., Nicolosi, V., Spacagna, RL., Paolella, L. (2023). Transportation Infrastructures Exposed to Seismic Risk: Evaluation of Social Costs for Resilience Design. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37126-4_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37126-4_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37125-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37126-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics