Abstract
Exposure to online health misinformation can be dangerous as it may lead to incorrect health decisions. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of credibility judgments against online health misinformation among older Chinese adults. We used an online experimental approach and adapted four stimuli containing misinformation from cancer and non-cancer articles. Sixty participants aged between 50 to 75 years completed the study. We measured objective health literacy (using the Newest Vital Sign) and subjective health literacy (using the eHEALS instrument) prior to the experiment. Participants then read the stimuli and rated each article’s credibility, as well as two types of psychological distances (i.e., social and hypothetical distance) to the health-related claims in the stimuli. Multiple linear regressions showed that older adults who had a closer psychological distance to the health issues had a decreased ability to judge the credibility of online health misinformation. Additionally, higher objective health literacy predicted more accuracy in credibility judgments, while higher subjective health literacy negatively influenced older adults’ credibility appraisal of misinformation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 80–87. Association for Computing Machinery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (1999)
Suarez-Lledo, V., Alvarez-Galvez, J.: Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e17187 (2021)
Johnson, S.B., et al.: Cancer misinformation and harmful information on Facebook and other social media: a brief report. JNCI: J. Natl. Can. Inst. 114, 1036–1039 (2022)
Peng, W., Lim, S., Meng, J.: Persuasive strategies in online health misinformation: a systematic review. Inf. Commun. Soc. 1–18 (2022)
Hilligoss, B., Rieh, S.Y.: Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Inf. Process. Manag. 44, 1467–1484 (2008)
Liao, Q.V., Fu, W.-T.: Age differences in credibility judgments of online health information. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 21, 1–23 (2014)
Seo, H., Blomberg, M., Altschwager, D., Vu, H.T.: Vulnerable populations and misinformation: a mixed-methods approach to underserved older adults’ online information assessment. New Media Soc. 23, 2012–2033 (2021)
Nan, X., Wang, Y., Thier, K.: Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation. Soc. Sci. Med. 314, 115398 (2022)
Zhao, Y.C., Zhao, M., Song, S.: Online health information seeking behaviors among older adults: systematic scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e34790 (2022)
Trope, Y., Liberman, N.: Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117, 440–463 (2010)
Kim, K., Zhang, M., Li, X.: Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. J. Consum. Res. 35, 706–713 (2008)
Liberman, N., Trope, Y.: Traversing psychological distance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 364–369 (2014)
Hansen, J., Wänke, M.: Truth from language and truth from fit: the impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 36, 1576–1588 (2010)
Southwell, B.G., Machuca, J.O., Cherry, S.T., Burnside, M., Barrett, N.J.: Health misinformation exposure and health disparities: observations and opportunities. Annu. Rev. Publ. Health 44 (2022)
Berkman, N.D., Davis, T.C., McCormack, L.: Health literacy: what is it? J. Health Commun. 15, 9–19 (2010)
Norman, C.D., Skinner, H.A.: eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J. Med. Internet Res. 8, e9 (2006)
Squiers, L., Peinado, S., Berkman, N., Boudewyns, V., McCormack, L.: The health literacy skills framework. J. Health Commun. 17, 30–54 (2012)
Zhang, Y., Song, S.: Older adults’ evaluation of the credibility of online health information. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, pp. 358–362. Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver BC, Canada (2020)
Chang, Y.-S., Zhang, Y., Gwizdka, J.: The effects of Information Source and eHealth literacy on consumer health information credibility evaluation behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 115, 106629 (2021)
Weiss, B.D., et al.: Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann. Family Med. 3, 514–522 (2005)
Norman, C.D., Skinner, H.A.: eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J. Med. Internet Res. 8, e507 (2006)
Li, G.: Robust regression. In: Hoaglin, D.C., Mosteller, F., Tukey, J.W. (eds.) Exploring Data Tables, Trends, and Shapes, pp. 281–340. Wiley, New York (1985)
Wright, S., et al.: Construal-level mind-sets and the perceived validity of marketing claims. Mark. Lett. 23, 253–261 (2012)
Van der Vaart, R., Drossaert, C.H., de Heus, M., Taal, E., van de Laar, M.A.: Measuring actual eHealth literacy among patients with rheumatic diseases: a qualitative analysis of problems encountered using Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 applications. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e2428 (2013)
Schulz, P.J., Pessina, A., Hartung, U., Petrocchi, S.: Effects of objective and subjective health literacy on patients’ accurate judgment of health information and decision-making ability: survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e20457 (2021)
Chinn, D., McCarthy, C.: All aspects of health literacy scale (AAHLS): developing a tool to measure functional, communicative and critical health literacy in primary healthcare settings. Patient Educ. Couns. 90, 247–253 (2013)
Heijmans, M., Waverijn, G., Rademakers, J., van der Vaart, R., Rijken, M.: Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Educ. Couns. 98, 41–48 (2015)
Acknowledgment
The study was jointly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (72204076, 72174083, 72074112), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M722477), and the Funds of Humanities and Social Sciences for the Central Universities (B220201054).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Song, S., Li, X., Sun, J., Zhao, Y. (2023). Credibility Judgment Against Online Health Misinformation Among Older Adults: Integrated View of Psychological Distance and Health Literacy. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14042. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34865-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34866-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)