Confidence as Part of Searcher’s Cognitive Context | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Confidence as Part of Searcher’s Cognitive Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science (LOD 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13811))

Abstract

A growing body of interdisciplinary NeuraSearch research in the Information Retrieval (IR) domain, built on the investigations evaluating searchers’ neurophysiological activity captured during the information search interactions, advances the understanding of the searchers’ cognitive context. Regarding the searchers’ information needs, the cognitive context represents the surroundings of a knowledge anomaly perceived in their state of knowledge. Memory retrieval is a fundamental mechanism that drives the users’ informativeness about their knowledge and knowledge gaps. Moreover, the confidence perceptions manifest the quality and attribute of the users’ memories and could be, thus, used as a sign of the quality of memories aiding the user to appraise their knowledge abilities. We used the methodology of NeuraSearch to reduce the cognitive burden commonly in traditional IR scenarios posed to the users to understand and interpret their subjective perceptions and feelings. We investigated the patterns of spatio-temporal brain activity (captured by EEG) in 24 neurologically-healthy volunteers engaged in textual general knowledge Question Answering (Q/A) Task. We looked for i) the evidence of functional processes leading to descriptive (factual) knowledge memory retrieval and ii) their interaction effects incorporating retrospective confidence judgments. Our investigation raises further questions informing research in IR and the area of user information seeking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 10295
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 12869
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The details of the procedure are due to page limit omitted.

  2. 2.

    https://trec.nist.gov/data/qamain.html.

  3. 3.

    http://www.mangelslab.org/bknorms.

  4. 4.

    A solution for multiple comparison problems and does not depend on multiple comparisons correction or Gaussian assumptions about the probability distribution of the data.

References

  1. Andolina, S., et al.: Investigating proactive search support in conversations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS 2018, pp. 1295–1307. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196734

  2. Arguello, J., Ferguson, A., Fine, E., Mitra, B., Zamani, H., Diaz, F.: Tip of the tongue known-item retrieval: a case study in movie identification. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR 2021, pp. 5–14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446021

  3. Bauer, E., Wilson, K., MacNamara, A.: Cognitive and affective psychophysiology (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818697-8.00013-3

  4. Bauer, P., Jackson, F.: Semantic elaboration: ERPs reveal rapid transition from novel to known. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 41, 271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belabbes, M., Ruthven, I., Moshfeghi, Y., Pennington, D.: Information overload: a concept analysis. J. Doc. 79, 144–159 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belkin, N., Oddy, R., Brooks, H.: ASK for information retrieval: part I. Background and theory. J. Doc. 38, 61–71 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Mullen, T., Kothe, C., Su, K.M., Robbins, K.A.: The prep pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Front. Neuroinform. 9, 16 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2015.00016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brainerd, C., Reyna, V.: The Science of False Memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Chua, E.F., Ahmed, R., Garcia, S.M.: Effects of HD-tDCS on memory and metamemory for general knowledge questions that vary by difficulty. Brain Stimul. 10(2), 231–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole, C.: A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge. Information Today Inc. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, W.: A definition of relevance for information retrieval. Inf. Storage Retrieval 7(1), 19–37 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(71)90024-6, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020027171900246

  12. Diana, R., Ranganath, C.: Recollection, familiarity and memory strength: confusion about confounds. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 337–8 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diana, R.A., Vilberg, K.L., Reder, L.M.: Identifying the ERP correlate of a recognition memory search attempt. Cogn. Brain Res. 24(3), 674–684 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dien, J.: Issues in the application of the average reference: review, critiques, and recommendations. Behav. Res. Methods 30, 34–43 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dien, J., Michelson, C., Franklin, M.: Separating the visual sentence n400 effect from the p400 sequential expectancy effect: cognitive and neuroanatomical implications. Brain Res. 1355, 126–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A., Kliegl, R.: Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. J. Exp. Psychol. Gener. 140, 552–72 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ditman, T., Holcomb, P.J., Kuperberg, G.R.: An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies. Psychophysiology 44(6), 927–935 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00593.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eugster, M.J., et al.: Natural brain-information interfaces: Recommending information by relevance inferred from human brain signals. Sci. Rep. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Franke, N., Radach, R., Jacobs, A., Hofmann, M.: No one way ticket from orthography to semantics in recognition memory: N400 and p200 effects of associations. Brain Res. 1639, 88–98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gould, S.J., Cox, A.L., Brumby, D.P.: Task lockouts induce crowdworkers to switch to other activities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2015, pp. 1785–1790. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732709

  21. Guo, C., Duan, L., Li, W., Paller, K.A.: Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval. Brain Res. 1118, 142–154 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hagoort, P.: Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15(6), 883–899 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322370807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hillyard, S., Hink, R., Schwent, V., Picton, T.: Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science (New York, N.Y.) 182, 177–80 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.182.4108.177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ingwersen, P.: Psychological aspects of information retrieval. Soc. Sci. Inf. Stud. 4(2), 83–95 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-6236(84)90068-1. Special Issue Seminar on the Psychological Aspects of Information Searching

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ingwersen, P.: Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. J. Doc. 52, 3–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ingwersen, P., Järvelin, K.: The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer, Germany (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3851-8

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Kangassalo, L., Spapé, M., Jacucci, G., Ruotsalo, T.: Why do users issue good queries?: neural correlates of term specificity. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2019, pp. 375–384. ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331243

  28. Kappenman, E., Luck, S.: Best practices for event-related potential research in clinical populations. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 1, 110–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42(5), 361–371 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Luck, S.: An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Minsky, M.: A Framework for Representing Knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo (306) (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moshfeghi, Y.: NeuraSearch: neuroscience and information retrieval. In: Alonso, O., Marchesin, S., Najork, M., Silvello, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Design of Experimental Search & Information REtrieval Systems, Padova, Italy, 15–18 September 2021. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2950, pp. 193–194. CEUR-WS.org (2021). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2950/paper-27.pdf

  33. Moshfeghi, Y., Pollick, F.: Neuropsychological model of the realization of information need. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 70, 954–967 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moshfeghi, Y., Triantafillou, P., Pollick, F.E.: Understanding information need. In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2911451.2911534

  35. Mueller, V., Brehmer, Y., von Oertzen, T., Li, S.C., Lindenberger, U.: Electrophysiological correlates of selective attention: a lifespan comparison. BMC Neurosci. 9, 18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pinkosova, Z., McGeown, W.J., Moshfeghi, Y.: The cortical activity of graded relevance. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2020, pp. 299–308. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401106

  37. Risko, E.F., Ferguson, A.M., McLean, D.: On retrieving information from external knowledge stores: feeling-of-findability, feeling-of-knowing and internet search. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65(C), 534–543 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Savolainen, R.: Information need as trigger and driver of information seeking: a conceptual analysis. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 69(1), 2–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2016-0139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Squire, L.R., Zola, S.M.: Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93(24), 13515–13522 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stróżak, P., Bird, C., Corby, K., Frishkoff, G., Curran, T.: Fn400 and LPC memory effects for concrete and abstract words. Psychophysiology 53, 669–1678 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor, R.S.: Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. Coll. Res. Libr. 29(3), 178–194 (1968). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_29_03_178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Voss, J.L., Paller, K.A.: pp. 81–98. No. September 2016, 3rd edn. Elsevier (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21070-5

  43. Wilson, T.: On user studies and information needs. J. Doc. 37(1), 3–15 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wynn, S.C., Daselaar, S.M., Kessels, R.P., Schutter, D.J.: The electrophysiology of subjectively perceived memory confidence in relation to recollection and familiarity. Brain Cogn. 130, 20–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NeuraSearch Laboratory, Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

    Dominika Michalkova & Yashar Moshfeghi

  2. School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

    Mario Parra Rodriguez

Authors
  1. Dominika Michalkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Parra Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yashar Moshfeghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yashar Moshfeghi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Giuseppe Nicosia

  2. University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Varun Ojha

  3. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Emanuele La Malfa

  4. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Gabriele La Malfa

  5. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Panos Pardalos

  6. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy

    Giuseppe Di Fatta

  7. University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Giovanni Giuffrida

  8. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA

    Renato Umeton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Michalkova, D., Rodriguez, M.P., Moshfeghi, Y. (2023). Confidence as Part of Searcher’s Cognitive Context. In: Nicosia, G., et al. Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science. LOD 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13811. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25891-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25891-6_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25890-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25891-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics