Explanation-Based Negotiation Protocol for Nutrition Virtual Coaching | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Explanation-Based Negotiation Protocol for Nutrition Virtual Coaching

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2022)

Abstract

People’s awareness about the importance of healthy lifestyles is rising. This opens new possibilities for personalized intelligent health and coaching applications. In particular, there is a need for more than simple recommendations and mechanistic interactions. Recent studies have identified nutrition virtual coaching systems (NVC) as a technological solution, possibly bridging technologies such as recommender, informative, persuasive, and argumentation systems. Enabling NVC to explain recommendations and discuss (argument) dietary solutions and alternative items or behaviors is crucial to improve the transparency of these applications and enhance user acceptability and retain their engagement. This study primarily focuses on virtual agents personalizing the generation of food recipes recommendation according to users’ allergies, eating habits, lifestyles, nutritional values, etc. Although the agent would nudge the user to consume healthier food, users may tend to object in favor of tastier food. To resolve this divergence, we propose a user-agent negotiation interacting over the revision of the recommendation (via feedback and explanations) or convincing (via explainable arguments) the user of its benefits and importance. Finally, the paper presents our initial findings on the acceptability and usability of such a system obtained via tests with real users. Our preliminary experimental results show that the majority of the participants appreciate the ability to express their feedback as well as receive explanations of the recommendations, while there is still room for improvement in the persuasiveness of the explanations.

Supported by Chist-Era (grant CHIST-ERA-19-XAI-005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases.

  2. 2.

    https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/factsheets/nutrition.html.

  3. 3.

    https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/elisaxxygao/foodrecsysv1?resource=download &select=core-data_recipe.csv.

  4. 4.

    https://blog.paperspace.com/measuring-text-similarity-using-levenshtein-distance/.

  5. 5.

    https://cosylab.iiitd.edu.in/culinarydb/.

  6. 6.

    The details of the utility calculation are explained below.

  7. 7.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet, http://www.mydailyintake.net/daily-intake-levels/.

  8. 8.

    We would like to state that the experiment protocol adopted in this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Özyeğin university, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

References

  1. Alexandra, V.A., Badica, C.: Recommender systems: an explainable AI perspective. In: 2021 International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), pp. 1–6. IEEE (08 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anjomshoae, S., Najjar, A., Calvaresi, D., Främling, K.: Explainable agents and robots: results from a systematic literature review. In: AAMAS, Montreal, Canada, May 13–17, pp. 1078–1088 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aydoğan, R., Festen, D., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M.: Alternating offers protocols for multilateral negotiation. In: Fujita, K., et al. (eds.) Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation. SCI, vol. 674, pp. 153–167. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51563-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayub, R., Ghazanfar, M.A., Maqsood, M., Saleem, A.: A jaccard base similarity measure to improve performance of CF based recommender systems, pp. 1–6 (01 2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIN.2018.8343073

  5. Chen, M., Jia, X., Gorbonos, E., Hoang, C.T., Yu, X., Liu, Y.: Eating healthier: exploring nutrition information for healthier recipe recommendation. Inf. Process. Manage. 57(6), 102051 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chi, Y.L., Chen, T.Y., Tsai, W.T.: A chronic disease dietary consultation system using owl-based ontologies and semantic rules. J. Biomed. Inform. 53, 208–219 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corrado, S., Luzzani, G., Trevisan, M., Lamastra, L.: Contribution of different life cycle stages to the greenhouse gas emissions associated with three balanced dietary patterns. Sci. Tot. Environ. 660, 622–630 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elsweiler, D., Trattner, C., Harvey, M.: Exploiting food choice biases for healthier recipe recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 575–584. Association for Computing Machinery (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fanda, L., Cid, Y.D., Matusz, P.J., Calvaresi, D.: To pay or not to pay attention: classifying and interpreting visual selective attention frequency features. In: Calvaresi, D., Najjar, A., Winikoff, M., Främling, K. (eds.) EXTRAAMAS 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12688, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Freyne, J., Berkovsky, S.: Recommending food: reasoning on recipes and ingredients. In: De Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 381–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13470-8_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ge, M., Ricci, F., Massimo, D.: Health-aware food recommender system. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 333–334. RecSys ’15, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibney, M.J., Forde, C.G., Mullally, D., Gibney, E.R.: Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 106(3), 717–724 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gunning, D., Aha, D.: Darpa’s explainable artificial intelligence (xai) program. AI Mag. 40(2), 44–58 (2019). Jun

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammond, K.J.: Chef: a model of case-based planning. In: AAAI (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, J.A., Benedict, F.G.: A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 4(12), 370–373 (1918)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Igor, T., Jean, E., Ndamlabin, M., Amro, N., Yazan, M., Stéphane, G.: A decentralized multilevel agent based explainable model for fleet management of remote drones. Procedia Comput. Sci. 203, 181–188 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ishizaka, A., Siraj, S.: Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? an experimental comparative study of three methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(2), 462–471 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawo, D., Neifer, T., Esau, M., Stevens, G.: Buying the ‘right’ thing: designing food recommender systems with critical consumers. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2021, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lazar, J., Feng, L.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Willey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mualla, Y., et al.: The quest of parsimonious XAI: a human-agent architecture for explanation formulation. Artif. Intell. 302, 103573 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Padhiar, I., Seneviratne, O., Chari, S., Gruen, D., McGuinness, D.L.: Semantic modeling for food recommendation explanations. In: ICDEW, pp. 13–19. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Popovski, G., Seljak, B., Eftimov, T.: Foodbase corpus: a new resource of annotated food entities. Database J. Biolog. Databases Curation 11, baz121 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica: J. Econ. Soc. 50(1), 97–109 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Samih, A., Adadi, A., Berrada, M.: Towards a knowledge based explainable recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things. BDIoT2019, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soutjis, B.: The new digital face of the consumerist mediator: the case of the ‘Yuka’ mobile app. J. Cultural Econ. 13(1), 114–131 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Starke, A., Trattner, C., Bakken, H., Johannessen, M., Solberg, V.: The cholesterol factor: balancing accuracy and health in recipe recommendation through a nutrient-specific metric. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2959 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Teng, C.Y., Lin, Y.R., Adamic, L.A.: Recipe recommendation using ingredient networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 298–307. WebSci 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Toledo, R.Y., Alzahrani, A.A., Martinez, L.: A food recommender system considering nutritional information and user preferences. IEEE Access 7, 96695–96711 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trang Tran, T.N., Atas, M., Felfernig, A., Stettinger, M.: An overview of recommender systems in the healthy food domain. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 50(3), 501–526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-017-0469-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tran, T.N.T., Felfernig, A., Trattner, C., Holzinger, A.: Recommender systems in the healthcare domain: state-of-the-art and research issues. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 57(1), 171–201 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, L., et al.: A dynamic multi-attribute group emergency decision making method considering experts’ hesitation. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 11(1), 163–182 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been par ally supported by the Chist-Era grant CHIST-ERA-19-XAI-005, and by (i) the Swiss National Science Foundation (G.A. 20CH21_195530), (ii) the Italian Ministry for Universities and Research, (iii) the Luxembourg National Research Fund (G.A. INTER/CHIST/19/14589586), (iv) the Scientific and Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK, G.A. 120N680).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berk Buzcu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Buzcu, B., Varadhajaran, V., Tchappi, I., Najjar, A., Calvaresi, D., Aydoğan, R. (2023). Explanation-Based Negotiation Protocol for Nutrition Virtual Coaching. In: Aydoğan, R., Criado, N., Lang, J., Sanchez-Anguix, V., Serramia, M. (eds) PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13753. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21202-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21203-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics