Abstract
A common problem facing an organisation of autonomous agents is to track the dynamic value of a signal, by aggregating their individual (and possibly inaccurate or biased) observations (sensor readings) into a commonly agreed result. A meta-problem is to explain the observation of the value: to say what rules produced the signal value that has been observed. In this paper, we use the Regulatory Theory of Social Influence and self-organising multi-agent systems to simulate a Distributed Information Processing unit (DIP) trying to solve such a meta-problem. Specifically, we examine what configuration of initial conditions on the DIP produce what type of epistemic condition for the collective, and determine the explanatory adequacy of this condition, i.e. to what extent does the DIP’s explanation of the rules match the actual rules. The results offer some further insight into the need for epistemic diversity for self-improvement in dynamic self-organising systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afshar, M., Asadpour, M.: Opinion formation by informed agents. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 13(4), 5 (2010)
Airiau, St., Sen, S., Villatoro, D.: Emergence of conventions through social learning. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent 28(5), 779–804 (2014)
Asch, S.E.: Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 70(9), 1–70 (1956)
Chacoma, A., Zanette, D.H.: Opinion formation by social influence: from experiments to modeling. PLoS One 10(10), e0140406 (2015)
Fadda, E., He J., Tessone, Cl., Barucca, P.: Consensus formation on heterogeneous networks. CoRR abs/2111.11949 (2021)
Foucault, M.: Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings. Colin Gordon (1980)
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion formation by social influence: opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3) (2002)
Klemm, K., Eguiluz, V.M.: Growing scale-free networks with small-world behavior. Phys. Rev. E 65(5), 057102 (2002)
Liu, Y., et al.: From local to global norm emergence: dissolving self-reinforcing substructures with incremental social instruments. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR), pp. 6871–6881 (2021)
Lopez-Sanchez M., Müller A.: On simulating the propagation and countermeasures of hate speech in social networks. Appl. Sci. 11(24), 12003 (2021)
Medo, M., Mariani, M.S. and Lü, L.: The fragility of opinion formation in a complex world. Commun. Phys. 4(75), 1–10 (2021)
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Rychwalska, A., Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, M., Ziembowicz, K., Biesaga, M., Kacprzyk-Murawska, M.: Target in Control. SC, Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30622-9
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Kinnear, T. (ed.) NA - Advances in Consumer Research 11:673–675, Association for Consumer Research (1984)
Pitt, J., Nowak, A., Michalak, T., Borkowski, W., Vallacher, R.: Knowing what the bits know: social influence as the source of collective knowledge. In: Second International Workshop on Agent-Based Modelling of Human Behaviour (ABMHuB) (2020). http://abmhub.cs.ucl.ac.uk/2020/papers/Pitt.pdf
Pitt, J.: interactional justice and self-governance of open self-organising systems. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), pp. 31–40 (2017)
Pitt, J. and Ober, J.: Democracy by design: basic democracy and the self-organisation of collective governance. In: 12th IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), pp. 20–29 (2018)
Prettejohn, B., Berryman, M., Mcdonnell, M.: Methods for generating complex networks with selected structural properties for simulations: a review and tutorial for neuroscientists. Front. Comput. Neurosc. 5 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00011. ISSN 1662-5188
Rizzi, L.: The concept of explanatory adequacy. In: Roberts, I. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)
Sen, S., Airiau, St.: Emergence of norms through social learning. In: 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), vol. 1507, pp. 1507–1512 (2007)
Sîrbu, A., Pedreschi, D., Giannotti, F., Kertész, J.: Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion fragmentation and polarization: a bounded confidence model. PLoS ONE 14(3), e0213246 (2019)
Trebilcock, M., Daniels, R.: Rule of Law Reform and Development: Charting the Fragile Path of Progress. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2008)
Villatoro, D., Sabater-Mir, J., Sen, S.: Social instruments for robust convention emergence. In: 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 420–425 (2011)
Wiggins, R.E.: Distributed information processing: trends and implications. In: Aslib Proceedings, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 73–90 (1985)
Acknowledgements
We are particularly grateful to the three anonymous reviewers whose many insightful comments helped to revise and improve the presentation of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mertzani, A., Pitt, J., Nowak, A., Michalak, T. (2022). Epistemic Diversity and Explanatory Adequacy in Distributed Information Processing. In: Ajmeri, N., Morris Martin, A., Savarimuthu, B.T.R. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems XV. COINE 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13549. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20845-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20845-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20844-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20845-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)