The Use of Technologies in Museums: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Web of Science Database | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

The Use of Technologies in Museums: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Web of Science Database

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability (ARTIIS 2022)

Abstract

This article starts with a short review of recent studies and reports on the adaptation of museums toward digital transformation. This first part aims at giving a contextualization of the current importance of the use of technologies, and an understanding of which are the current strategies and struggles museums face regarding their use. In correlation to this context, it becomes relevant to analyze the scientific literature and understand how it reflects the evolution of the adoption of technologies, such as the themes under investigation, inferring trends, among others. Therefore, the second part explores the scientific production related to the use of technologies in museums, in the last decade, by using a bibliometric analysis approach. This study allows us to understand the evolution of the scientific literature on the adoption of technologies in museums, and proposes an agenda for future research that offers the potential to advance research on the use of new digital technologies in museums.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 10295
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 12869
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahaman, H.: Digital heritage interpretation: a conceptual framework. Digit. Creat. 29, 1–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2018.1511602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bec, A., Moyle, B., Timms, K., Schaffer, V., Skavronskaya, L., Little, C.: Management of immersive heritage tourism experiencs: a conceptual model. Tour. Manag. 72, 117–120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ch’ng, E., Cai, S., Leow, F.-T., Zhang, E.: Adoption and use of emerging cultural technologies in China’s museums. J. Cult. Herit. 37, 170–180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.11.016

  4. Kamariotou, V., Kamariotou, M., Kitsios, F.: Strategic planning for virtual exhibitions and visitors’ experience: a multidisciplinary approach for museums in the digital age. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 21, e00183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00183

  5. Tim, Y., Ouyang, T., Zeng, D.: Back to the future: actualizing technology affordances to transform emperor Qin’s terracotta warriors museum. Inf. Manage. 57, 103271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103271

  6. Leopardi, A., et al.: X-reality technologies for museums: a comparative evaluation based on presence and visitors experience through user studies. J. Cult. Herit. 47, 188–198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, Y., Chen, J., Wang, M.: A meta-analytic review on incorporating virtual and augmented reality in museum learning. Educ. Res. Rev. 36, 100454 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100454

  8. Kotut, L., et al.: Supporting child–group interactions with hands-off museum exhibit. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 27, 100240 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100240

  9. Donohue, J.C.: A bibliometric analysis of certain information science literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 23, 313–317 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630230506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garfield, E.: How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it relevant? Part 1. Curr. Contents 44, 5–13 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Magyar, G.: Bibliometric analysis of a new research sub-field. J. Doc. 30, 32–40 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saracevic, T., Perk, L.J.: Ascertaining activities in a subject area through bibliometric analysis. application to library literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 24, 120–134 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240207

  13. Windsor, D.A.: Could bibliometric data be used to predict the clinical success of drugs? J. Doc. 32, 174–181 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leeebvre, V.M., Fetterman, N.I.: Bibliometric analysis of the journal of consumer studies and home economics, 1977–1983. J. Consum. Stud. Home Econ. 9, 11–22 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.1985.tb00437.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Culnan, M.J., Swanson, E.B.: Research in management information systems, 1980–1984: Points of work and reference. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 10, 289–301 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/249263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sousa, J.P., Cordeiro, P.A.N., Carvalho, A.: Video games and cultural heritage: a bibliometric analysis of scientific production in the scopus database. In: Proceedings 37th IBIMA Conference. Cordoba, Spain (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aria, M.: Bibliometrix R package. https://www.bibliometrix.org

  18. Bekele, M.K., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Malinverni, E.S., Gain, J.: A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 11(2), 1-36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3145534

  19. Alletto, S., et al.: An indoor location-aware system for an IoT-based smart museum. IEEE Internet Things J. 3, 244–253 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2506258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sommerauer, P., Mueller, O.: Augmented reality in informal learning environments: a field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Comput. Educ. 79, 59–68 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T., Petrelli, D.: Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead. USER Model. USER-Adapt. Interact. 22, 73–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoon, S.A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., Tucker, S.: Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 7, 519–541 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9156-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dieck, M.C.T., Jung, T.H.: Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: a stakeholder approach. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 6, 110–117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. He, Z., Wu, L., Li, X.: (Robert): when art meets tech: the role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tour. Manag. 68, 127–139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Charitonos, K., Blake, C., Scanlon, E., Jones, A.: Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (how) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43, 802–819 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01360.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pallud, J., Straub, D.W.: Effective website design for experience-influenced environments: the case of high culture museums. Inf. Manage. 51, 359–373 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kenteris, M., Gavalas, D., Economou, D.: Electronic mobile guides: a survey. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 15, 97–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0295-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sigmobile Mob Comput Commun Rev. 3, 3–11 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1145/329124.329126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Carrizosa, H.G., Sheehy, K., Rix, J., Seale, J., Hayhoe, S.: Designing technologies for museums: accessibility and participation issues. J. Enabling Technol. 14, 31–39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-08-2019-0038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Clary, K.S., Dillian, C.: Printing the past building accessibility and engagement through 3-D technologies. Publ. Hist. 43, 41–62 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2021.43.2.41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gomes, B.C.G.L., de S., Romani, E., Souza, A.C.P., Liberalino, I.R. de M.: Communicational accessibility on science museums: considerations on assistive technology. Humanidades Inovacao. 8, 261–272 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pietroni, E., Pagano, A., Biocca, L., Frassineti, G.: Accessibility, natural user interfaces and interactions in museums: the intarsi project. Heritage 4, 567–584 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4020034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duguleana, M., Briciu, V.-A., Duduman, I.-A., Machidon, O.M.: A virtual assistant for natural interactions in museums. Sustainability. 12(17), 6958 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176958

  34. Tanwar, G., Chauhan, R., Yafi, E.: Artycul: A privacy-preserving ML-driven framework to determine the popularity of a cultural exhibit on display. Sensors. 21(4), 1527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041527

  35. Raptis, G.E., Kavvetsos, G., Katsini, C.: MuMIA: Multimodal interactions to better understand art contexts. Appl. Sci.-Basel. 11(6), 2695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062695

  36. Cossu, S.: Labours of love and convenience: dealing with community-supported knowledge in museums. Publications. 7(1), 19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010019

  37. López-Martínez, A., Carrera, Á., Iglesias, C.A.: Empowering museum experiences applying gamification techniques based on linked data and smart objects. Appl. Sci. 10(16), 5419 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165419

  38. Comes, R., Grec, C., Neamtu, C., Gazdac, C., Mateescu-Suciu, L.: intangible heritage?...not anymore from photo to 3D printed cultural heritage assets replicas the two missing iron discs from the dacian hillfort of piatra rosie (Romania). J. Anc. Hist. Archaeol. 8, 134–143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14795/j.v8i1.622

  39. Cooper, C.: You can handle it: 3D printing for museums. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 7, 443–447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2019.39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UIDB/05757/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Paulo Sousa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sousa, J.P., Cordeiro, P., Cunha, C.R. (2022). The Use of Technologies in Museums: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Web of Science Database. In: Guarda, T., Portela, F., Augusto, M.F. (eds) Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability. ARTIIS 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20316-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20316-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20315-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20316-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics