Students’ Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction at the Interface Level of a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Tool | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Students’ Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction at the Interface Level of a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing (CollabTech 2022)

Abstract

Well-being has been considered an urgent vein of discussion in fields that intersect with Information and Communication Technologies. In this paper, we used a questionnaire adapted from the METUX (Motivation, Engagement, and Thriving in User Experience) model to explore how well a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) tool’s interface satisfy users’ needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness; and to test the instrument’s validity in a CSCL context. METUX provides scales grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) allowing researchers to foster insights into how technology designs support or undermine psychological needs, boosting user well-being. 53 bachelor students represented the tool’s users based on convenience sampling. Our findings showed that users may not perceive the autonomy construct in the tools’ interface, taking a neutral stance toward aspects of competence and relatedness as well. The results indicate the need for design interventions to improve the interface’s ease of use, and the components that facilitate interaction and feelings of being connected. Regarding the instrument, more work is needed to validate the use of METUX interface in CSCL, especially for the autonomy subscale. Also, more scales from METUX (e.g., adoption and task spheres of experience) are needed to be included in the future for a fuller validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 8579
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 10724
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Press, New York (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press. (1985). (Taylor & Francis Online)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan, R.M.: Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. J. Pers. 63, 397–427 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In: John, O.P., Robins, R.W., Pervin, L.A. (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3rd edn, pp. 654–678. Guilford, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Church, A.T., et al.: Need satisfaction and well-being: testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 44(4), 507–534 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu, H.-C., Wang, C.V., Levesque-Bristol, C.: Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24(3), 2159–2174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., De Fraine, B.: The gender gap in student engagement: the role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 85(4), 498–518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roorda, D.L., Koomen, H.M., Spilt, J.L., Oort, F.J.: The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: a meta-analytic approach. Rev. Educ. Res. 81(4), 493–529 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiu, T.K.F.: Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 54(sup1), S14–S30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 61, 101860 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

  12. Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S.: Motivational foundations of game-based learning. In: Plass, J.L., Mayer, R.E., Homer, B.D. (eds.) Handbook of Game-Based Learning, pp. 153–176. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peters, D., Calvo, R.A., Ryan, R.M.: Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front Psychol 9, 797 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V.F., Kristiansen, R.: The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Comput. Educ. 53, 1177–1187 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Law, W., King, R., Notari, M., Cheng, E., Chu, S.: Why do some students become more engaged in collaborative wiki writing? The role of sense of relatedness. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym 2014), pp. 1–6. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2641580.2641603

  16. Calvo, R., Peters, D.: Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, X., Aurisicchio, M.: Designing conversational agents: a self-determination theory approach. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2021), Yokohama, Japan, 08–13 May 2021, 16 p. ACM, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445445

  18. Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernandez, E.D., Asensio-Perez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.A., Symeon, R.: CSCL scripting patterns: hierarchical relationships and applicability. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), pp. 388–392 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652452

  19. Manathunga, K., Hernández-Leo, D.: PyramidApp: scalable method enabling collaboration in the classroom. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 422–427. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D.L., Chang, C.H., Rosen, C.C.: A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. J. Manag. 42(5), 1195–1229 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grolnick, W.S., Ryan, R.M.: Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. J. Educ. Psychol. 81, 43–54 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Ryan, R.M.: Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educ. Psychol. 26, 325–346 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Connell, J.P., Wellborn, J.G.: Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. In: Gunnar, M.R., Sroufe, L.A. (eds.) Self Processes and Development. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, vol. 23, pp. 43–77. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T.D., Suthers, D.D.: Computer supported collaborative learning: a historical perspective. In: Cambridge Hand-Book of the Learning Sciences, pp. 409– 426. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y., Villasclaras Fernández, E.D.: Generating CSCL scripts: from a conceptual model of pattern languages to the design of real scripts. In: Technology-Enhanced Learning: Design Patterns and Pattern Languages, pp. 49–64 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.: Computational representation of collaborative learning flow patterns using IMS learning design. Educ. Technol. Soc. 8(4), 75–89 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y., Villasclaras, E.D.: Generating CSCL scripts: from a conceptual model of pattern languages to the design of real scripts. In: Goodyear P.; Retalis, S. (eds.) Technology-Enhanced Learning, Design Patterns and Pattern Languages, Series Technology-Enhanced Learning, pp. 49–64. Sense Publishers (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manathunga, K., Hernández-Leo, D.: Authoring and enactment of mobile pyramid-based collaborative learning activities. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 49(2), 262–275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. IEEE: IEEE recommended practice for assessing the impact of autonomous and intelligent systems on human well-being. IEEE Std 7010-2020, pp. 1–96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9084219

  30. Hakami, E., Hernández-Leo, D., Amarasinghe, I.: Understanding the well-being impact of a computer-supported collaborative learning tool: the case of PyramidApp. In: De Laet, T., Klemke, R., Alario-Hoyos, C., Hilliger, I., Ortega-Arranz, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2021. LNCS, vol. 12884, pp. 373–378. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52(1), 141–166 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeno, L.M., Diseth, Å., Grytnes, J.A.: Testing the METUX model in higher education: interface and task need–satisfaction predict engagement, learning, and well-being. Front. Psychol. 12, 631564 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631564

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by grant PID2020-112584RBC33 funded by MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. D. Hernández-Leo (Serra Húnter) acknowledges the support by ICREA under the ICREA Academia program. P. Santos acknowledges the support by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under the Ramon y Cajal programme. E. Hakami acknowledges the grant by Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyad Hakami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hakami, E., El Aadmi-Laamech, K., Hakami, L., Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D., Amarasinghe, I. (2022). Students’ Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction at the Interface Level of a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Tool. In: Wong, LH., Hayashi, Y., Collazos, C.A., Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Baloian, N. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13632. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20217-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20218-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics