Evaluation Methods Review of the Innovation Capacity of Companies Based on Knowledge Management | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluation Methods Review of the Innovation Capacity of Companies Based on Knowledge Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1655))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The knowledge economy and the improvement of efficiency in the dissemination and promotion of the achievements of innovation from the knowledge generated in the organization is relevant. The value chain of knowledge allows absorbing and making the most of new knowledge useful to improve competitiveness opportunities for business competitiveness. The relevant elements that evaluate the innovation of organizations based on knowledge management are delimiting through the bibliographic review in the Scopus and Google Scholar databases, using Boolean search formulas. About evaluation methods nearly to 40% work in organizational strategy, in approx. 25% include in region cluster and industry for the optimization. Hence the preponderance of topics related to knowledge optimization and innovation, decision making, value generation and knowledge supply chains. Finally, all models have limitations that must be considered, in relation to the cultural context where they are applied and the human-organizational phenomenon present. They should also consider the limitations in the use of quantitative techniques, leaving aside the richness of qualitative constructs in the analysis and strategic decision-making for a technological evolution of organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tang, H.: The value creation path and effect evaluation of enterprise marine informatization project in the context of big data (2020). https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI112-114.1

  2. Cong, R., et al.: Evaluation of Engineering Team’s Knowledge Base Management Capability Based on Cloud Model (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMME51517.2020.00011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shao, W., Feng, X., Zhu, M., Tao, R., Lv, Y., Shi, Y.: Fuzzy evaluation system for innovation ability of science and technology enterprises. In: Uden, L., Ting, I.-H., Wang, K. (eds.) KMO 2021. CCIS, vol. 1438, pp. 147–159. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81635-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, A.: The application of virtual teams in the improvement of enterprise management capability from the perspective of knowledge transfer. PLoS ONE 17(3), e0264367 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264367

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Han, H., Gu, X.: Evaluation of innovation efficiency of high-tech enterprise knowledge supply chain based on AHP-DEA. J. Math. 2022, 1–9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3210474

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Guan, H.: Research on performance evaluation model of papermaking enterprise innovation management based on organizational shared mental model (2018). https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059179848&origin=inward&txGid=07ffe4f76fdd2dff7ea65c7c98204c15&featureToggles=FEATURE_NEW_DOC_DETAILS_EXPORT:1#metrics

  7. Li, Y., Wang, S.-S., Wang, Y.-H.: The appraisal and empirical study on the knowledge management running performance of High-tech industrialization (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2014.6930345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chun-Yu, Z.: Research on enterprise knowledge value chain model (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2011.5968697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sonj, L., et al.: A study on performance evaluation model of individual knowledge-sharing (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2010.5471974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D Lin, W.Yu., Wu, C., Cheng, T.: Correlation between intellectual capital and business performance of construction industry–an empirical study in Taiwan (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1315528

  11. Yu, D., Yang, J.: Knowledge management research in the construction industry: a review. J. Knowl. Econ. 9(3), 782–803 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0375-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Robescu, D., Fatol, D., Baesu, V., Draghici, A.: Conceptual knowledge sharing model to support organizational performance development. Expanding Horizons: Business, Management and Technology for Better Society, ToKnowPress (2020). https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/mklp20/255-262.html

  13. Xiaoping, B., Tao, P.: Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management of Technological Innovation in Safety Evaluation Planning of Construction Projects (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, L.: Performance evaluation of knowledge sharing in an industry-university-research alliance based on PSO-BPNN. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 1–9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1283588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, X., Hu, D., Li, N., Xiao, Y.: Comprehensive evaluation on teachers’ knowledge sharing behavior based on the improved TOPSIS method. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 1–8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2563210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, H., He, Y.: Manufacturing knowledge management performance evaluation based on grey fuzzy evaluation (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ESIAT.2010.5568310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jun, Y., Kim, K.: Developing an open innovation attitude assessment framework for organizations: focusing on open innovation role perspective and locus of activity. Behav. Sci. 12(2), 46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Silverstein, A., Benson, A., Gates, C., Nguyen, D.: Global community of practice: a means for capacity and community strengthening for health professionals in low- and middle-income countries. J. Glob. Health 12, 04034 (2022). https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Zheng, S., Xiao, L., Gao, H., Lu, H.: Dynamic impact of technology and finance on green technology innovation efficiency: empirical evidence from China’s Provinces. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19(8), 4764 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Trstenjak, M., Opetuk, T., Cajner, H., Hegedić, M.: Industry 4.0 readiness calculation—transitional strategy definition by decision support systems. Sensors 22(3), 1185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031185

  21. Durand, F., Richard, L., Beaudet, N., Fortin-Pellerin, L., Hudon, A.M., Tremblay, M.-C.: Healthcare professionals’ longitudinal perceptions of group phenomena as determinants of self-assessed learning in organizational communities of practice. BMC Med. Educ. 22(1), 75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03137-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, R., Zhang, H.: Artificial-intelligence-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of innovative knowledge management in universities. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 1–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5655269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pei, S.: Research on innovation performance of regional industrial enterprises above scale based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. In: 2022 7th International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA), pp. 349–354 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDA55095.2022.9760308

  24. Szczekala, Ł., Stadnicka, D.: Knowledge management as a sustainable development supporting method in manufacturing organizations – a systematic literature review. In: Batako, A., Burduk, A., Karyono, K., Chen, X.W.R. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing Processes, Intelligent Methods and Systems in Production Engineering. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 335, pp. 431–459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90532-3_34

  25. Bao, Z., Wang, C.: A multi-agent knowledge integration process for enterprise management innovation from the perspective of neural network. Inf. Process. Manage. 59(2), 102873 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102873

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Investigación en Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos – MIST, Universidad Indoamérica, Av. Machala y Sabanilla, 170103, Quito, Ecuador

    Mireya Zapata-Rodríguez

  2. Centro de Transferencia de Tecnología e Innovación – CTTI, Universidad Indoamérica, Av. Machala y Sabanilla, 170103, Quito, Ecuador

    Jorge Álvarez-Tello

  3. Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Económicas – FACAE, Universidad Indoamérica, Av. Bolívar y Guayaquil, Ambato, Ecuador

    Jenny Martínez-Crespo

Authors
  1. Jorge Álvarez-Tello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jenny Martínez-Crespo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mireya Zapata-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Álvarez-Tello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Crete and Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Constantine Stephanidis

  2. Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Margherita Antona

  3. Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Stavroula Ntoa

  4. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

    Gavriel Salvendy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Álvarez-Tello, J., Martínez-Crespo, J., Zapata-Rodríguez, M. (2022). Evaluation Methods Review of the Innovation Capacity of Companies Based on Knowledge Management. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19681-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19682-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation