Datafication, Dehumanisation and Participatory Development | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Datafication, Dehumanisation and Participatory Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Freedom and Social Inclusion in a Connected World (ICT4D 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 657))

Abstract

This paper asks whether datafication practices are dehumanising international development and if a human-centred and participatory datafication is possible. The paper uses Habermas’ theory of the different ‘knowledge interests’ that constitute different forms of social action. Three kinds of datafication projects are explored: humanitarian AI, digital-ID and community mapping. The authors argue that data-science and participatory practices are forms of social action that are shaped by different knowledge-interests. It is argued that the technical knowledge interests shaping datafication projects conflict with high-level policy commitments to participatory development. Ethical Principles of AI are assessed as a route to more human-centred practices of datafication for development. The authors argue that avoiding tokenistic forms of participation will require the incorporation of practical and emancipatory knowledge interests and the use of new monitoring and evaluation tools to trace the achieved levels of participation of different actors at each stage of the project cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Digital Development Principles were developed by funders, multi-laterals and international development agencies to guide the use of digital technologies in development. https://digitalprinciples.org/.

  2. 2.

    Mastercard Transforming Humanitarian Response https://www.mastercard.us/en-us/business/governments/find-solutions/humanitarian-aid.html.

  3. 3.

    IrisGuard funded by Goldman Sachs https://www.irisguard.com/who-we-are/about-us/.

  4. 4.

    Experian partners with Humanitarian Open StreetMap https://www.experianplc.com/media/4224/experian-sb-report-2021.pdf.

  5. 5.

    The Montreal Declaration on Responsible AI.

  6. 6.

    OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence.

  7. 7.

    The UNESCO Recommendation on AI.

  8. 8.

    https://digitalprinciples.org/endorse/endorsers/.

References

  1. Heeks, R.: Information and Communications Technology for Development. Routeledge, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feeny, T., Elson, O.: Artificial Intelligence in International Development, Results for Development (2019). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b156e3bf2e6b10bb0788609/t/5e1f0a37e723f0468c1a77c8/1579092542334/AI+and+international+Development_FNL.pdf

  3. World Bank: World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. The World Bank, Washington (2016). https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1

  4. USAID: Digital Download 2018, Center for Digital Development. United States Agency for International Development, Washington (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. OCHA: Data Responsibility Guidelines: Working Draft. The Centre for Humanitarian Data: OCHA, The Hague (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, T., Faith, B.: Digital aid: understanding the digital challenges facing humanitarian assistance. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton (2021). https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/16484

  7. Taylor, L., Broeders, D.: In the name of development: power, profit and datafication in the global south. Geoforum 64, 229–237 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernandez, K., Roberts, T.: Predictive analytics in humanitarian action: a preliminary mapping and analysis. Emerging issues, knowledge for development report 33. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton (2020). https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15455

  9. Chambers, R.: Whose Reality Counts? Putting the Last First. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornwall, P.: The Participation Reader. Zed Books, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foster, C., Graham, M., Mwolo Waema, T.: Making sense of digital disintermediation and development: the case of the mombassa tea auction. In: Graham, M. (ed.) Digital Economies at Global Margins. MIT Press, Cambridge (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eubanks, V.: Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s Press, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hernandez, K., Roberts, T.: Leaving no one behind in a digital world: an extended literature review. Institute of Development Studies (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamin, R.: Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity, Medford (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heeks, R., Shekhar, S.: Datafication, development and marginalised urban communities: an applied data justice framework. Inf. Commun. Soc. 22(7), 992–1011 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lyytinen, K.J., Klein, H.K.: The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In: Mumford, E., Hirschheim, R., Fitzgerald, G., et al. (eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems, pp. 207–225. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Walsham, G.: Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations. Wiley, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng, Y., Stahl, B.: Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to Sen’s capability approach? Ethics Inf. Technol. 13(2), 69–80 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin, C.I., Myers, M.D.: Extending ICT4D studies: the value of critical research. MIS Q. 39(3), 697–712 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poveda, S., Roberts, T.: Critical agency and development: applying Freire and Sen to ICT4D in Zambia and Brazil. Inf. Technol. Dev. 24(1), 119–137 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1328656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Habermas, J.: Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann, London (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  22. IDRC: Artificial intelligence and human development : toward a research agenda. Canadian International Development Research Centre, Ottowa (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. IDRC: Data for Development: the road ahead. Canadian International Development Research Centre, Ottowa (2019). https://idatosabiertos.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/D4D_report-dig-1.pdf

  24. Mann, S., Hilbert, M.: Int. J. Commun. 14, 4385–4405 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Flyverbom, M., Madsen, A.K., Rasche, A.: Big data as governmentality in international development: digital traces, algorithms, and altered visibilities. Inf. Soc. Routledge 33(1), 35–42 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S.: Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks (2016). ProPublica, text/html, 23 May 2016. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminalsentencing

  27. Brayne, S., Rosenblat, A., Boyd, D.: Predictive policing (2015). datacivilrights.org. http://www.datacivilrights.org/pubs/2015-1027/Predictive_Policing.pdf

  28. Fitterer, J., Nelson, T.A., Nathoo, F.: Predictive crime mapping. Police Pract. Res. 16(2), 121–135 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stroud, M.: The minority report: Chicago’s new police computer predicts crimes, but is it racist? (2014). The Verge, 19 February 2014. http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/19/5419854/theminority-report-this-computer-predicts-crime-but-is-it-racist

  30. Privacy International: Palantir and the UN’s World Food Programme, London Privacy International (2019). https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/3405/palantir-and-uns-world-food-programme-are-partnering-reported-45-million

  31. Milmo, D.: Rohingya sue Facebook for £150bn over Myanmar genocide (2021). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/dec/06/rohingya-sue-facebook-myanmar-genocide-us-uk-legal-action-social-media-violence

  32. Bowker, G.: Memory Practices in the Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gitelman, L. (ed.): “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Manovich, L.: Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data. In: Gold, M.K. (ed.) Debates in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pawleke, A., Cañares, M., Hernandez, K., Prieto Martin, P.: Data for development: what’s next? Concepts, trends and recommendations for German Development Cooperation. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) (2017). https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14154

  37. Sen, A.: Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Siwale, J., Godfroid, C.: Digitising microfinance: on the route to losing the traditional ‘human face’ of microfinance institutions. Oxf. Dev. Stud. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2021.1998409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Roberts, T., Hernandez, K., Faith, B., Prieto Martín, P.: Key issues in digitalisation and governance. SDC Governance Network, Swiss Development Cooperation, Bern (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Masiero, S., Arvidsson, V.: Degenerative outcomes of digital identity platforms for development. Inf. Syst. J. 31(6), 903–928 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Faith, B., Roberts, T.: Risks and benefits of digital social protection. BASIC Research Working Paper 3. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton (2022). https://doi.org/10.19088/BASIC.2022.003

  42. Sharma, P., Joshi, A.: Challenges of using big data for humanitarian relief: lessons from the literature. J. Humanit. Logist. Supply Chain Manag. 10(4), 423–446 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. OHCHR: Report of the special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. No. Seventy-Fourth Session: Item 72(b) of the Provisional Agenda (2019). https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25156. Accessed 27 Nov 2020

  44. McQuillan, D.: People’s councils for ethical machine learning. Soc. Media Soc. 4(2), 1–10 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. World Bank: Principles on identification for sustainable development: toward the digital age. The World Bank, Washington (2017). http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/213581486378184357/pdf/Principles-onidentification-for-sustainable-development-toward-the-digital-age.pdf

  46. Amnesty International: Amnesty International Submission to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Impact of Digital Technologies on Social Protection and Human Rights (2019). https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Poverty/DigitalTechnology/AmnestyInternational.pdf

  47. Rao, U., Nair, V.: Aadhaar: governing with biometrics. South Asia: J. South Asian Stud. 42(3), 469–481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1595343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chaudhuri, B.: Paradoxes of Intermediation in aadhaar: human making of a digital infrastructure. South Asia J. South Asian Stud. 42(3), 572–587 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1598671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pasquale, F.: The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Society. Harvard University Press, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Noble, S.: Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press, New York (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. O’Neil, C.: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Penguin Books, London (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Liberty Human Rights: Predictive policing. Liberty Human Rights (2020). https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/fundamental/predictive-policing/

  53. Privacy International: IBM (not) ending facial recognition - our quick thoughts. Privacy International (2020). http://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/3898/ibm-not-endingfacial-recognition-our-quick-thoughts

  54. Lee, D.: San Francisco is first US city to ban facial recognition (2019). BBC News, 14 May 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-48276660

  55. Floridi and Cowls: Unified Framework of AI Principles in Society, HDSR 1.1, MIT Press (2019). https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/l0jsh9d1/release/8

  56. Birhane, A.: Algorithmic injustice: a relational ethics approach. Patterns 2(2) (2021). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666389921000155

  57. Arnstein, S.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Am. Plann. Assoc. 35(4), 216–224 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Freire, P.: Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fals-Borda, O.: Investigating reality in order to transform it: the Colombian experience. Dialect. Anthropol. Amsterdam 4(1), 33–35 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Swantz, M.: Research as education for development, a Tanzanian case. In: Hall, B. (ed.) Creating Knowledge: A Monopoly? Participatory Research in Development. SPRIA, New Delhi (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Chambers, R.: Rural Development. Longman, Essex (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hickey, S., Mohan, G.: Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation. Zed Books, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mansuri, G., Rao, V.: Does participation improve development outcomes? (2012). https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821382561_CH05

  64. World Bank: The World Bank Participation Sourcebook. The World Bank, Washington (1996). https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/0-8213-3558-8

  65. Faith, B., Roberts, T., Berdou, E.: Towards a more gender-inclusive open source community. Digital Impact Alliance, Washington (2018). https://dial.global/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GenderOSS_v10_PDF.pdf

  66. Barker, L., Mancha, C., Ashcraf, C.: What is the impact of gender diversity on technology business performance? National Centre for Women and Information Technology (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ishamn, J., Naravan, D., Pritchett, L.: Does participation improve performance?: Establishing causality with subjective data. World Bank Econ. Rev. 9(2), 175–200 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wald, N.: Anarchist participatory development: a possible new framework? Dev. Change 46(4), 618–643 (2014). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/dech.12136

  69. OHCHR: Declaration on the Right to Development, New York, United Nations (1986). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-right-development

  70. UNSDSN: Indicators and Monitoring Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva, United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2015). https://indicators.report/targets/16-7/

  71. Cornwall, A., Jewkes, R.: What is participatory research? Soc. Sci. Med. 41(12), 1667–1676 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Cooke, B., Kothari, U. (eds.): Participation: The New Tyranny. Zed Books, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Holland and Blackburn: Whose Voice? Participatory Research and Policy Change. Intermediate Technology Publications, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Pain, R., Francis, P.: Reflections on participatory research. Area 35(1), 46–54 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kindon, S., Pain, R., Kesby, M.: Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. Roberts, T.: Digital affordances in participatory research methods. In: Burns, D., Howard, J., Ospina, S. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Participatory Research and Inquiry. SAGE, London (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Roberts, T., Howard, J.: The participation cube: retrospective analysis of projects in Zambia and Uganda. In: Conference Paper, Development Studies Association Conference, May 2022 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wagner, B.: Ethics as an escape from regulation. From “ethics-washing” to ethics-shopping?, pp. 84–88. Amsterdam University Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13281

  79. Bietti, E.: From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In: Proceedings of ACM FAT* Conference (FAT* 2020), New York, NY, USA, 10 p. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372860

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, UK

    Tony Roberts

  2. Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK

    Yingqin Zheng

Authors
  1. Tony Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yingqin Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Roberts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK

    Yingqin Zheng

  2. The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Pamela Abbott

  3. ESAN University, Lima, Peru

    Jose Antonio Robles-Flores

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roberts, T., Zheng, Y. (2022). Datafication, Dehumanisation and Participatory Development. In: Zheng, Y., Abbott, P., Robles-Flores, J.A. (eds) Freedom and Social Inclusion in a Connected World. ICT4D 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 657. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19428-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19429-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation