Classifying Different Types of Talk During Collaboration | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13356))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Pair programmers utilizing more Exploratory (critical, constructive) talk has been shown to help students achieve a better mutual understanding of problems they are solving. In this paper, we investigate the promise of fine tuning a pretrained transformer-based machine learning model to classify utterances into Exploratory, Cumulative, and Disputational talk. The task of classifying utterances into different types of collaborative talk was approached as a multi-label text classification problem. This is the first successful automatic classification of utterances into the different types of collaborative talk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/translator/.

References

  1. Hughes, J., Walshe, A., Law, B., Murphy, B.: Remote pair programming. In: CSEDU 2020 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, vol. 2, pp. 476–483 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009582904760483

  2. Begel, A., Nagappan, N.: Pair programming: what’s in it for me? In: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 120–128, October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mercer, N.: Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. Routledge, London (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Zakaria, Z., et al.: Collaborative talk across two pair-programming configurations (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., Rojas-Drummond, S.: Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. J. Classr. Interact. 50(1), 54–72 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vygotsky, L.: Interaction between learning and development. Read. Dev. Child. 23(3), 34–41 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zakaria, Z.: Two-computer pair programming: exploring a feedback intervention to improve collaborative talk in elementary students. Comput. Sci. Educ. 32(1), 1–28 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ubani, S., Nielsen, R.: Review of Collaborative Intelligent Tutoring Systems (CITS) 2009–2021. In: 2022 11th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT), pp. 67–75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIT54416.2022.9690733

  9. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.JSTOR2529310.PMID843571

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. He, P., Liu, X., Gao, J., Chen, W.: DeBERTa: Decoding enhanced BERT with disentangled attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03654 (2020)

  11. Wei, J., Zou, K.: EDA: Easy data augmentation techniques for boosting performance on text classification tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11196 (2019)

  12. Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., Birch, A.: Improving neural machine translation models with monolingual data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06709 (2015)

  13. Conneau, A., Kruszewski, G., Lample, G., Barrault, L., Baroni, M.: What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01070 (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Zarifa Zakaria, Jessica Vandenberg, Jennifer Tsan, Danielle Cadieux Boulden, Collin F. Lynch, and Eric N. Wiebe from North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA and Kristy Elizabeth Boyer from University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA for granting us access to the dataset used in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Solomon Ubani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ubani, S., Nielsen, R. (2022). Classifying Different Types of Talk During Collaboration. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral Consortium. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13356. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11646-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11647-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics