A Basic Study on Educational Growth Indicators Based on Quantitative Evaluation of Strokes Quality in Drawing Works | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Basic Study on Educational Growth Indicators Based on Quantitative Evaluation of Strokes Quality in Drawing Works

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022)

Abstract

This study develops a set of indicators for the quantitative evaluation of drawing work in the study of drawing. In basic drawing classes, students are taught to simplify the strokes that they use. To simplify a stroke means to use only straight lines and simple curves. In this study, we focus on the shapes of individual strokes in drawing work. We have been conducting a remote drawing learning support system at a Japanese art school since 2012. At this school, a digital drawing instruction using a digital pen is offered for 3 months at the beginning of each school year. Through drawing with a digital pen, each stroke that the learner applies is recorded together with the relevant temporal and geometrical information. In this paper, we describe the abstract stroke information collected and classify it using a self-organizing feature map, a machine learning method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagai, T., Kayama, M., Itoh, K.: A drawing learning support system based on the drawing process mode. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 11(2), 146–164 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wen, Z., Shankar, A., Antonidoss, A.: Modern art education and teaching based on artificial intelligence. J. Interconnect. Netw. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021926592141005X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Long, Y.: Research on art innovation teaching platform based on data mining algorithm. Clust. Comput. 22, S14943–S14949 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elalfi, A.E.E., Elatawy, M.F., Mahmoud, N.M.: Using artificial intelligence techniques for evaluating practical art products for the students in art education. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 182(15), 19–26 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yuxi, J.Y., Li, P., Wang, W., et al.: GAN-based pencil drawing learning system for art education on large-scale image datasets with learning analytics. Interact. Learn. Environ. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636827

  6. Gang, L., Weishang, G.: The effectiveness of pictorial aesthetics based on multiview parallel neural networks in art-oriented teaching. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3735104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sartori, A., Yanulevskaya, V., Salah, A.A., et al.: Affective analysis of professional and amateur abstract paintings using statistical analysis and art theory. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5(2), 1–27 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sato, K.: Developmental trial in drawing instruction at art/design universities. Shizuoka Univ. Art Cult. Bull. 4, 153–162 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sekine, E.: A trial to develop the ART SYSTEM. Art Educ. 6, 89–100 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sakimoto, T., Nagai, T., Kayama, M., et al.: A consideration for the classification algorithm for hatching-like strokes in complex line set for effectiveness improvement of auto drawing assessment function in digital drawing learning support system, SIG in “Knowledge, Skill, and Technology succession” in Japanese Society of Artificial Intelligence, SIG-KST-030-02, pp. 1–6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagai, T., Sakimoto, T., Kayama, M.: DEGITal drawing: an innovative challenge for drawing skill development in art education, e-learning excellence awards. In: Academic Conference and Publishing International, UK England, pp. 133–154 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anoto Group AB: Anoto Digital pen. https://www.anoto.com/cases/anoto-digital-pen/. Accessed 3 May 2022

  13. Kohonen, T.: Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43(1), 59–69 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mizue Kayama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sugii, K., Nagai, T., Kayama, M. (2022). A Basic Study on Educational Growth Indicators Based on Quantitative Evaluation of Strokes Quality in Drawing Works. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics