Support Local Empowerment Using Various Modeling Approaches and Model Purposes: A Practical and Theoretical Point of View | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Support Local Empowerment Using Various Modeling Approaches and Model Purposes: A Practical and Theoretical Point of View

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social Simulation

Abstract

Theoretical trends in agent-based modeling (ABM) draw sharp lines that usually limit the expressiveness of models to fit their methodological box: KISS puts emphasis on parsimonious and tractable model for systematic simulation analysis, KIDS focuses on the use of data for model specification and simulation validation, while KILT highlights the involvement of stakeholders to build representative model and turn simulation into a learning tool. In this proposal, we stress the benefit to break the lines and reinstate the various agent-based model purposes, focuses and supports in the particular context of designing transformative ABM. The proposed perspective to burst methodological boxes is based on the creation of models to mix social actors and issues based on sub-models supporting a variety of theoretical approaches. To back this methodological claim, we detailed a 10 years-long modeling effort to represent and support community based management of renewable resources in the wetlands of the lower Amazon, in the Para state of Brazil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 25167
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 31459
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 31459
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489), 1390–1396 (1981). American Association for the Advancement of Science Section. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396, https://science.sciencemag.org/content/211/4489/1390

  2. Barreteau, O., Bots, P., Daniell, K., Etienne, M., Perez, P., Barnaud, C., Bazile, D., Becu, N., Castella, J.C., Daré, W., Trebuil, G.: Participatory approaches. In: Edmonds, B., Meyer, R. (eds.) Simulating Social Complexity: A Handbook. Understanding Complex Systems, pp. 197–234. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bommel, P., Bonnet, M.P., Coudel, E., Haentjens, E., Nunes, C., Melo, G., Nasuti, S.: Livelihoods of local communities in an Amazonian floodplain coping with global changes. In: iEMSs Proceedings, Toulouse, p. 8 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., D’Aquino, P., Etienne, M., Boissau, S., Aubert, S., Le Page, C., Babin, D., Castella, J.: Multi-agent systems and role games: collective learning processes for ecosystem management (2002). https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02582720

  5. van Bruggen, A., Nikolic, I., Kwakkel, J.: Modeling with stakeholders for transformative change. Sustainability 11(3), 825 (2019). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030825, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/825

  6. Castro, J., Drews, S., Exadaktylos, F., Foramitti, J., Klein, F., Konc, T., Savin, I., Bergh, J.: A review of agent–based modeling of climate–energy policy. WIREs Clim. Chang. 11(4) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.647, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcc.647

  7. Edmonds, B., Moss, S.: From KISS to KIDS - an ‘anti-simplistic’ modelling approach. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) Multi-Agent and Multi-Agent-Based Simulation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 130–144. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Étienne, M., Bousquet, F., Le Page, C., Trébuil, G.: Transferring the ComMod approach. In: Étienne, M. (ed.) Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development, pp. 291–309. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilbert, N., Ahrweiler, P., Barbrook-Johnson, P., Narasimhan, K.P., Wilkinson, H.: Computational modelling of public policy: reflections on practice. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 21(1), 14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanappi, H.: Agent-based modelling. History, essence, future (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isaac, V.J., Castello, L., Santos, P.R.B., Ruffino, M.L.: Seasonal and interannual dynamics of river-floodplain multispecies fisheries in relation to flood pulses in the lower Amazon. Fish. Res. 183, 352–359 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.017, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783616302065

  12. Isaac, V.J., De Almeida, M.C.: El consumo de pescado en la Amazonía brasileña. COPESCAL. Documento Ocasional (13), I (2011). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kagho, G.O., Balac, M., Axhausen, K.W.: Agent-based models in transport planning: current state, issues, and expectations. Procedia Comput. Sci. 170, 726–732 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.164, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S187705092030627X

  14. Katz, E., Lammel, A., Bonnet, M.P.: Climate change in a floodplain of the Brazilian Amazon: scientific observation and local knowledge. In: Welch-Devine, M.E., Sourdril, A.E., Burke, B.E. (eds.) Changing Climate, Changing Worlds: Local Knowledge and the Challenges of Social and Ecological Change. Ethnobiology, pp. 123–144. Springer (2020). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02613684

  15. Le Page, C., Perrotton, A.: KILT: a modelling approach based on participatory agent-based simulation of stylized socio-ecosystems to stimulate social learning with local stakeholders. In: Sukthankar, G., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A. (eds.) Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 31–44. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. McGrath, D.G., Cardoso, A., Almeida, O.T., Pezzuti, J.: Constructing a policy and institutional framework for an ecosystem-based approach to managing the lower Amazon floodplain. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 10(5), 677 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9154-3

  17. McGrath, D.G., Castello, L., Almeida, O.T., Estupiñán, G.M.B.: Market formalization, governance, and the integration of community fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon. Soc. Nat. Resour. 28(5), 513–529 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1014607, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08941920.2015.1014607

  18. McGrath, D.G., de Castro, F., Futemma, C., de Amaral, B.D., Calabria, J.: Fisheries and the evolution of resource management on the lower Amazon floodplain. Human Ecology 21(2), 167–195 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889358

  19. Metcalf, S.S., Wheeler, E., BenDor, T.K., Lubinski, K.S., Hannon, B.M.: Sharing the floodplain: mediated modeling for environmental management. Environ. Model. Softw. 25(11), 1282–1290 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.009, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364815208002193

  20. Pahl-Wostl, C.: The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecol. Soc. 11(1), art10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01542-110110, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art10/

  21. Squazzoni, F., Polhill, J.G., Edmonds, B., Ahrweiler, P., Antosz, P., Scholz, G., Chappin, E., Borit, M., Verhagen, H., Giardini, F., Gilbert, N.: Computational models that matter during a global pandemic outbreak: a call to action. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 23(2), 10 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stefanska, J., Magnuszewski, P., Sendzimir, J., Romaniuk, P., Taillieu, T., Dubel, A., Flachner, Z., Balogh, P.: A gaming exercise to explore problem-solving versus relational activities for river floodplain management: a game to explore problem-solving vs. relational activities. Environ. Policy Gov. 21(6), 454–471 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.586, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/eet.586

  23. Taillandier, P., Grignard, A., Marilleau, N., Philippon, D., Huynh, Q.N., Gaudou, B., Drogoul, A.: Participatory modeling and simulation with the GAMA platform. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 22(2), 3 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Theophilo Folhes, R.: A gênese da transumância no baixo Rio Amazonas: arranjos fundiários, relações de poder e mobilidade entre ecossistemas. Boletim Goiano de Geografia 38(1), 138–158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5216/bgg.v38i1.52818, https://www.revistas.ufg.br/bgg/article/view/52818

  25. Voinov, A., Bousquet, F.: Modelling with stakeholders. Environ. Model Softw. 25(11), 1268–1281 (2010). Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Chapuis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chapuis, K. et al. (2022). Support Local Empowerment Using Various Modeling Approaches and Model Purposes: A Practical and Theoretical Point of View. In: Czupryna, M., Kamiński, B. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics