A Transformation Model for Excelling in Product Roadmapping in Dynamic and Uncertain Market Environments | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Transformation Model for Excelling in Product Roadmapping in Dynamic and Uncertain Market Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 13126))

  • 849 Accesses

Abstract

Context: Many companies are facing an increasingly dynamic and uncertain market environment, making traditional product roadmapping practices no longer sufficiently applicable. As a result, many companies need to adapt their product roadmapping practices for continuing to operate successfully in today’s dynamic market environment. However, transforming product roadmapping practices is a difficult process for organizations. Existing literature offers little help on how to accomplish such a process. Objective: The objective of this paper is to present a product roadmap transformation approach for organizations to help them identify appropriate improvement actions for their roadmapping practices using an analysis of their current practices. Method: Based on an existing assessment procedure for evaluating product roadmapping practices, the first version of a product roadmap transformation approach was developed in workshops with company experts. The approach was then given to eleven practitioners and their perceptions of the approach were gathered through interviews. Results: The result of the study is a transformation approach consisting of a process describing what steps are necessary to adapt the currently applied product roadmapping practice to a dynamic and uncertain market environment. It also includes recommendations on how to select areas for improvement and two empirically based mapping tables. The interviews with the practitioners revealed that the product roadmap transformation approach was perceived as comprehensible, useful, and applicable. Nevertheless, we identified potential for improvements, such as a clearer presentation of some processes and the need for more improvement options in the mapping tables. In addition, minor usability issues were identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 7435
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 9294
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kostoff, R.N., Schaller, R.: Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 48(2), 132–143 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kameoka, A., Kuwahara, T., Li, M.: Integrated strategy development: an integrated roadmapping approach. In: PICMET 2003: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology Management for Reshaping the World, pp. 370–379. Portland, OR, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Phaal, R., Farrukh, J.P.C., Probert, R.: Characterization of technology roadmaps: purpose and format. In: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings, vol. 1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No. 01CH37199), pp. 367–374. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lombardo, C.T., McCarthy, B., Ryan, E., Conners, M.: Product Roadmaps Relaunched - How to Set Direction While Embracing Uncertainty. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Trieflinger, S., Münch, J., Bogazköy, E., Eißöer, P., Schneider, J., Roling, B.: Product roadmap alignment – achieving the vision together: a grey literature review. In: Paasivaara, M., Kruchten, P. (eds.) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming – Workshops. XP 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 396, pp. 50–57. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58858-8_6

  6. Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Lang, D.: Why feature based roadmaps fail in rapidly changing markets: a qualitative survey. In: International Workshop on Software-intensive Business: Start-ups, Ecosystems and Platforms, pp. 202–218. CEUR-WS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Lang, D.: What’s hot in product roadmapping? Key practices and success factors. In: Franch, X., Männistö, T., Martínez-Fernández, S. (eds.) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2019. LNCS, vol. 11915, pp. 401–417. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_29

  8. Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Bogazköy, E., Roling, B., Eißler, P.: Product roadmap formats for an uncertain future: a grey literature review. In: Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA2020), pp. 284–291. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Lang, D.: DEEP: the product roadmap maturity model: a method for assessing the product roadmapping capabilities of organizations. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Software-Intensive Business: Start-ups, Platforms, and Ecosystems (SiBW2019), pp. 19–24. Conference Publishing Consulting, Passau (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Lang, D.: The product roadmap maturity model DEEP: validation of a method for assessing the product roadmap capabilities of organizations. In: Hyrynsalmi, S., Suoranta, M., Nguyen-Duc, A., Tyrväinen, P., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.) ICSOB 2019. LNBIP, vol. 370, pp. 97–113. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Lang, D.: Product roadmap -from vision to reality: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. SAFe: SAFe Implementation Roadmap. https://www.scaledagileframework.com/implementation-roadmap/. Accessed 5 Oct 2021

  13. Trieflinger, S., Münch, J., Knoop, V.: Facing the challenges with product roadmaps in uncertain markets: experience from industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. SAGE Publications Inc., London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Trieflinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A. DEEP Product Roadmap Self-assessment Tool

Appendix A. DEEP Product Roadmap Self-assessment Tool

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trieflinger, S., Münch, J., Wagner, S., Lang, D., Roling, B. (2021). A Transformation Model for Excelling in Product Roadmapping in Dynamic and Uncertain Market Environments. In: Ardito, L., Jedlitschka, A., Morisio, M., Torchiano, M. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13126. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91452-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91452-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91451-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91452-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics