Abstract
Graduate education institutes in the United States (US) have been working on programs to increase the number of students and faculty from marginalized communities. When choosing to pursue a doctoral degree, the common question is ‘where is the best fit for me?’ Aspiring graduate students may feel the need for a reference point - someone with a similar background who has experienced or is currently experiencing the doctoral process, whether that be a student or a faculty member. Currently, there is no single location where that question can be answered for those in marginal communities, however answering that question also has an impact on the student’s post-graduation career path. In lieu of a single person, and to help provide information critical to answering the question, we built the Institute Demographic Ontology (InDO). InDO integrates US graduate institute’s doctoral recipient demographic data with data describing broad field of study, fine field of study, and the pursued career path to produce a knowledge graph for each prospective student’s query. The terminology is structured in five levels of hierarchy providing room for the most abstract top level (basic components used to describe an institute’s demographics), to the most concrete bottom levels (particular graduate program offered by the institute, along with corresponding provenance). Our resource (InDO) could be used by students within a marginalized community in the US to infer whether a given institute has the resources to support a given program, based on demographic information such as number of doctorates awarded in a given field. We design a use case where an InDO-based knowledge graph is created incorporating some of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Doctoral Recipient Survey 2019 data. Our use case demonstrates the usage of InDO in the real world while providing a way to access NSF data in a machine readable format. Evaluation of our ontology is done with a set of competency questions created from the perspective of an aspirant marginalized graduate student who would be willing to use our system to gather information for making an informed decision. InDO provides an ontological foundation towards building a social machine as an aid to higher education and graduate mobility in the US.
Resource Website:
https://tetherless-world.github.io/institute-demographic-ontology
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gay, G.: Navigating marginality enroute to the professoriate: graduate students of color learning and living in academia. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 17(2), 265–288 (2004)
Sevelius, J.M., et al.: Research with marginalized communities: challenges to continuity during the Covid-19 pandemic. AIDS Behav. 24(7), 2009–2012 (2020)
Keshan, N.: Building a social machine for graduate mobility. In: 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, pp. 156–157 (2021)
Foley, D.: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2019. NSF 21–230. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), National Science Foundation, Alexandria (2021). https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21320/
Thomas, K.N., Willis, L.A., Davis, J.: Mentoring minority graduate students: issues and strategies for institutions, faculty, and students. Equ. Oppor. Int. 26, 178–192 (2007)
McGee Jr., R.: Saran, S., Krulwich. T.A.: Diversity in the biomedical research workforce: developing talent. Mt. Sinai. J. Med. 79(3), 397–411 (2012)
Ullrich, L.E., Ogawa, J.R., Jones-London, M.D.: Factors that influence career choice among different populations of neuroscience trainees. bioRxiv (2021)
Girves, J.E., Zepeda, Y., Gwathmey, J.K.: Mentoring in a post-affirmative action world. J. Soc. Iss. 61(3), 449–479 (2005)
Bartman, C.C.: African American women in higher education: issues and support strategies (2015)
Balhoff, J.P., et al.: Tailoring the NCI thesaurus for use in the obo library. In: ICBO (2017)
Balshaw, D.M., Collman, G.W., Gray, K.A., Thompson, C.L.: The children’s health exposure analysis resource (chear): enabling research into the environmental influences on children’s health outcomes. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 29(3), 385 (2017)
Ahmed, N., Khan, S., Latif, K.: Job description ontology. In: 2016 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), pp. 217–222. IEEE (2016)
Tiwari, S., Al-Aswadi, F.N., Gaurav, D.: Recent trends in knowledge graphs: theory and practice. Soft Comput. 25(13), 8337–8355 (2021)
Paulheim, Heiko: Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Seman. Web 8(3), 489–508 (2017)
Guo, O., et al.: A survey on knowledge graph-based recommender systems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (2020)
Kendall, E.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology engineering. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web. Theory Technol. 9(1), i–102 (2019)
Acknowledgement
This work is part of the “Building a Social Machine for Graduate Mobility” project and is supported in part by the Rensselaer-IBM Artificial Intelligence Research Collaboration. We would like to thank all the participants of the RPI IRB study #1924 that provided more insights into the graduate mobility gap. We would also like to thank Dean Stanley Dunn, Dean of Graduate Education, who provided expert insights into this issue. We would also like to thank the members of the Tetherless World Constellation at RPI who provided insights into this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Keshan, N., Fontaine, K., Hendler, J.A. (2021). InDO: the Institute Demographic Ontology. In: Villazón-Terrazas, B., Ortiz-Rodríguez, F., Tiwari, S., Goyal, A., Jabbar, M. (eds) Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web. KGSWC 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1459. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91305-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91305-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91304-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91305-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)